The Indian Journal of Labour Economics

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 203–216 | Cite as

Cyclical asymmetries and short-run relation between employment and output: the case of organised manufacturing in India

  • Jitender Singh
  • Arup Mitra


Using time series data from 1990–91 to 2011–12 and panel-data at 4-digit groups of NIC for the period 2008–09 to 2011–12 from the Annual Survey of Industries, this paper examines the argument that fall in employment is deeper in recession than the rise during boom, while fall and rise in output are of same intensity during recession and boom respectively. The result shows that the fall in both output and employment in Organized Manufacturing in India was sharper in downturns than their rise in upturns. Moreover, the decline in output decreases employment more than the employment created by a similar rise in output. For contract workers, the decline in jobs is even sharper in downturns than in upturns. During upturns, existing workers and skilled employees are used more intensively, and more jobs are created for skilled employees.


Employment Manufacturing Cycles Contract 

Supplementary material


  1. Blanchard, O. and P. Diamond (1990), “The Cyclical Behavior of the Gross Flows of U.S. Workers”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1990, No. 2, pp 85–155, Also available at Scholar
  2. Bound, J. and H. Holzer (2000), “Demand Shifts, population adjustments, and labour market outcomes during the 1980s”, Journal of Labour Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 20–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryan, M. and S. Longhi (2013), “Couples’ labour supply responses to job loss: boom and recession compared”, Working Paper No. 20, Institute for Social and Economic Research, Essex, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, Steven J. and John Haltiwanger (1990), “Gross Job Creation and Destruction: Microeconomic Evidence and Macroeconomic Implications”, in Olivier Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990, National Bureau of Economic Research, Vol. 5, pp. 123–186Google Scholar
  5. Fay, J.A. and J.L. Medoff (1985), “Labor and output over the business cycle: Some direct evidence”, American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 638–655.Google Scholar
  6. Ferraro, D. (2016), “The Asymmetric Cyclical Behavior of the U.S. Labor Market”, Available at SSRN: Scholar
  7. Hall, R. (1980), “Employment fluctuation and wage rigidity”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1980, No. 1, Also Available at Scholar
  8. Hamermesh, D.S. and G.A. Pfann (1996), “Adjustment Constant in Factor Demand”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 1264–1292.Google Scholar
  9. Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Long, De J. Bradford and Lawrence H. Summers (1986), “Is Increased Price Flexibility Stabilizing?”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, December, pp. 1138–54.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, W.C. (1913), Business Cycles, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  12. Mitchell, W.C. (1927), Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Morley, James and Jeremy Piger (2012), “The Asymmetric Business Cycle”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 208–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neftci, S.N. (1984), “Are Economic Time Series Asymmetric over the Business Cycle?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Notowidigdo, M.J. (2011), “The Incidence of Local Labor Demand Shocks”, NBER Working Paper No. 17167, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Sichel, D.E. (1989), “Are Business Cycles Asymmetric? A Correction”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 1255–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Labour Economics 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Policy and PromotionMinistry of Commerce and Industry, Government of IndiaNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Economic Growth (IEG)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations