The Indian Journal of Labour Economics

, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 217–232

Demographic deposit, dividend and debt

Article

Abstract

In spite of the rising academic attention being paid to path-dependency in social history, when it comes to the history of economic thinking, we seem to be stuck in a Markovian nirvana where debates of the past are forgotten under the onslaught of new ideas. Nowhere is this more evident than in the discourse on demographic dividend that ignores decades of debates surrounding the relationship between population growth and economic development. This paper seeks to fill this niche by: (1) placing the discourse on demographic dividend in the context of past debates on population and development; (2) differentiating between demographic deposit and demographic dividend, that is, the mechanical aspects of population composition and potentially transformative power of these changes, as well as the conditions under which these may affect the Indian economy; and (3) focusing on the upcoming demographic debt as the population ages.

Keywords

Demographic dividend Age structure India Economic demography Aging Labour force 

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1997), “‘Bargaining’ and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiyar, S. and A. Modi (2013), “The Demographic Dividend: Evidence from the Indian States”, India Policy Forum, 2012-13, Vol. 9, pp. 106–138.Google Scholar
  3. Barik, D., T. Agrawal and S. Desai (2015), “After the Dividend: Caring for a Greying India”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 50, No. 24, pp. 104–112.Google Scholar
  4. Basu, A.M. (1993), “Cultural Influences on the Timing of First Births in India: Large Differences that Add up to Little Difference”, Population Studies, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu, A.M. and S. Desai (2016), “Hopes, Dreams and Anxieties: India’s One-Child Families”, Asian Population Studies, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G.S. (1993), A Treatise on the Family, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, D., D. Canning, and J. Sevilla (2003), The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  8. Boserup, E. (1976), “Environment, Population, and Technology in Primitive Societies”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caldwell, J. (1998), “Malthus and the Less Developed World: The Pivotal Role of India”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 675–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassen, R. (1994), “Population and Development: Old Debates, New Conclusions”, Overseas Development Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Coale, A.J. and E.M. Hoover (1958), Population Growth and Economic Development in Low Income Countries, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  12. Derne, S. (1994), “Hindu Men Talk about Controlling Women: Cultural Ideas as a Tool of the Powerful”, Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Desai, S. (2011), “After the Demographic Dividend: The Three Things India Must Do Now to Prepare for an Ageing Population”, Business Standard, 29 December, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  14. Desai, S. (2013), “Women in Workforce: Burden of Success, Decline in Participation”, Yojana, Vol. 57, pp. 56–59.Google Scholar
  15. Desai, S. (2013), “Commentary,” India Policy Forum, 2012-13, Vol. 9, pp. 138–142.Google Scholar
  16. Desai, S., A. Dubey, B.L. Joshi, M. Sen, A. Shariff and R. Vanneman (2010), Human Development in India: Challenges for a Society in Transition, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  17. Desai, S., A. Dubey, R. Vanneman and R. Banerji (2009), “Private Schooling in India: A New Educational Landscape”, in S. Bery, B. Bossworth, and A. Panagariya (eds.), India Policy Forum Vol. 5, Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
  18. Desai, S. and D. Jain (1994), “Maternal Employment and Changes in Family Dynamics: The Social Context of Women’s Work in Rural South India”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. England, P. (2005), “Emerging Theories of Care Work”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 31, pp. 381–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldin, C. (1995), “The U-Shaped Female Labour Force Function in Economic Development and Economic History”, in T.P. Schultz (ed.), Investment in Women’s Human Capital and Economic Development, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 61–90.Google Scholar
  21. Government of India (2014), “Economic Survey 2014–15”, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  22. Guilmoto, C.Z. and I. Rajan (2013), “Fertility at District Level in India: Lessons from the 2011 Census”, in Working Paper du CEPED, n°30, UMR 196, IRD, Paris, CEPED, Université Paris Descartes, INED, Paris, Available at: http://www.ceped.org/wp. Accessed on 10 November 2014.
  23. Heady, D. and A. Hodge (2009), “The Effect of Population Growth on Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Macroeconomic Literature”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 221–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hirway, I. and S. Jose (2011), “Understanding Women’s Work Using Time-Use Statistics: The Case of India”, Feminist Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jain, D. and N. Banerjee (1985), “Tyranny of the Household: Investigative Essays on Women’s Work”, Shakti, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  26. Jeffrey, R. and P. Jeffrey (1997), Population, Gender and Politics: Demographic Change in Rural North India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson, D.G. and R.D. Lee (1986), Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy Questions, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Desai, S, P. Vashishtha and O. Joshi (2015), Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act: A Catalyst for Rural Transformation, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  29. Klasen, S. and J. Pieters (2012), “Push or Pull? Drivers of Female Labour Force Participation during India’s Economic Boom”, IZA Discussion Paper 6395, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  30. Kuznets, S. (1960), “Population Change and Aggregate Output”, in U.-N.B.o.E. Research (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Colombia University Press, New York, pp. 324–51.Google Scholar
  31. Ladusingh, L. and M.R. Narayana (2011), “The Role of Familial Transfers in Supporting the Lifecycle Deficit in India”, in R. Lee and A. Mason (eds.), Population Aging and Generational Economy: A Global Perspective, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp. 459–74.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, R. (2003), “The Demographic Transition: Three Centuries of Fundamental Change”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, R. and A. Mason (2006), “What is the Demographic Dividend?”, Finance and Development, Vol. 43, No. 3. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2006/09/basics.htm, Accessed on 10 November 2014.
  34. Lee, R. and A. Mason (2011), Population Aging and the Generational Economy: A Global Perspective, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehrer, E. and M. Nerlove (1986), “Female Labour Force Behaviour and Fertility in the United States”, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 12, pp. 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lloyd, C. (1991), “The Contribution of the World Fertility Surveys to an Understanding of the Relationship between Women’s Work and Fertility”, Studies in Family Planning, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 144–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meadows, D., D. Meadows, J. Randers and W.H. Breherns (1972). Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Meyers, M. and J. Gornick (2005) Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment: Drawing Lessons from Europe. Challenge, Vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
  39. National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2006), “Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 2004–05 (Part I)”, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  40. National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) (2013), “Key Indicators of Employment and Unemployment in India, NSS 68th Round, 2011–12”, Government of India, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  41. Pritchett, L. and A. Beatty (2012) The Negative Consequences of Over-ambitious Curricula in Developing Countries. Harvard Center for Global Development Working Paper 293, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  42. Sinha, A. and R. Kanbur (2012), “Introduction: Informality Concepts, Facts and Models”, Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sobotka, T. (2008), “Overview Chapter 6: The Diverse Faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe”, Demographic Research, Vol. S7, No. 8, pp. 171–224.Google Scholar
  44. Solow, R.M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Solow, R.M. (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Srinivas, M.N. (1977) The changing position of Indian women. Man, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. United Nations (2013) World Population Prospects, 2012 Revision. United Nations Population Division, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Labour Economics 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations