Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated assessment of embodied carbon and financial costs in simply supported beams

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With escalating concerns over environmental sustainability, the construction industry is facing increasing pressure to minimize its carbon footprint. This study investigated the embodied carbon assessment and cost implications of simply supported beams constructed from concrete and steel materials. The objective was to provide guidance for structural engineers in material selection, particularly for beam structures. The methodology involved a comprehensive analysis of embodied carbon at different stages of the construction process, including product procurement, transportation, and on-site construction activities. Additionally, a cost analysis was conducted to evaluate the financial implications of the material choices. The findings reveal significant differences in the embodied carbon between concrete and steel beams, with steel beams exhibiting lower carbon emissions for shorter spans, whereas concrete beams are more environmentally friendly for longer spans. Moreover, cost analysis underscores the influence of material selection on the overall project cost, with steel beams generally being more expensive than concrete beams. These results highlight the importance of balancing the structural, environmental, and financial considerations in material selection, ultimately contributing to the advancement of sustainable construction practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acree GA, Arpad H (2005) Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings. J Infrastruct Syst 11(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmadian FF, A. et al (2017) BIM-enabled sustainability assessment of material supply decisions. Eng Constr Archit Manag 24(4):668–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-12-2015-0193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali KA, Ahmad MI, Yusup Y (2020) ‘Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12187427.

  4. Azam A et al (2021) Analyzing the effect of natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy on GDP and carbon emissions: A multi-variate panel data analysis. Energy 219:119592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azam A et al (2022) Towards Achieving Environmental Sustainability: The Role of Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and ICT in the Top-Five Carbon Emitting Countries. Frontiers Energy Res 9(March):1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.804706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baek C et al (2016) Life Cycle CO2 assessment by block type changes of apartment housing. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(8):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080752

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Basbagill J et al (2013) Application of life-cycle assessment to early stage building design for reduced embodied environmental impacts. Build Environ 60:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BS 15978: 2011 (2011) ‘Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method’.

  9. BSN (2019) ‘SNI 2847–2019 Persyaratan Beton Struktural Untuk Bangunan Gedung Dan Penjelasan’, Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia

  10. BSN (2020) ‘SNI 1729–2020: Spesifikasi untuk bangunan gedung baja struktural’, Badan Standardisasi Nasional Indonesia

  11. Cabeza LF et al (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29:394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho SH, Chae CU (2016) A study on life cycle CO2 emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(6):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibbon, O.P. et al. (2022) How to calculate embodied carbon. The Institution of Structural Engineers. Available at: https://www.istructe.org/resources/guidance/how-to-calculate-embodied-carbon/.

  14. González MJ, García Navarro J (2006) Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Build Environ 41(7):902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Häkkinen T et al (2015) Reducing embodied carbon during the design process of buildings. J Build Eng 4:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaveh A (2017) Cost and CO2 Emission Optimization of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using Enhanced Colliding Bodies Optimization Algorithm. In: Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48012-1_17

  17. Lee J, Tae S, Kim R (2018) A Study on the analysis of CO2 emissions of apartment housing in the construction process. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee S, Park W, Lee H (2013) Life cycle CO2 assessment method for concrete using CO2 balance and suggestion to decrease LCCO2 of concrete in South-Korean apartment. Energy and Buildings 58:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pacheco-Torres R et al (2014) Analysis of CO2 emissions in the construction phase of single-family detached houses. Sustain Cities Soc 12:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2014.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park J, Tae S, Kim T (2012) Life cycle CO2 assessment of concrete by compressive strength on construction site in Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(5):2940–2946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shafique M, Luo X (2022) Environmental life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles from the current and future energy mix perspective. J Environ Manage 303:114050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tae S et al (2011) The development of apartment house life cycle CO2 simple assessment system using standard apartment houses of South Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(3):1454–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tae S, Baek C, Shin S (2011) Life cycle CO2 evaluation on reinforced concrete structures with high-strength concrete. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31(3):253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. UNEP (2022) 2022 Global Status Report For Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang N et al (2017) Ten questions concerning future buildings beyond zero energy and carbon neutrality. Build Environ 119:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X et al (2015) Estimation of carbon dioxide emission in highway construction: a case study in southwest region of China. J Clean Prod 103:705–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang X et al (2023) Characteristics of embodied carbon emissions for high-rise building construction: A statistical study on 403 residential buildings in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 198:107200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107200

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Directorate General of Higher Education, Research and Technology, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology as part of Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi Tahun 2024 entitle “Konstruksi Hijau Untuk Masa Depan: Upaya Mengurangi Embodied Carbon pada Proyek Gedung Bertingkat”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia

    Riza Suwondo,  Juliastuti & Militia Keintjem

Authors
  1. Riza Suwondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliastuti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Militia Keintjem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RS and JJ wrote and review the paper draft; MK conducted the analysis and design

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riza Suwondo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suwondo, R., Juliastuti & Keintjem, M. Integrated assessment of embodied carbon and financial costs in simply supported beams. J Build Rehabil 9, 86 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00439-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-024-00439-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation