Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis and development of the Composite Sustainable Condition Index for elevated service reservoir (ESR) by DER method

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated service reservoirs (ESR) in rural India are in poor condition since they are always ignored after construction. In the repair and maintenance of the ESR, the interests of regional stakeholders, the budget and financial health of the local government and the political will of local leadership all play a part. There is no index that identifies the ESR's status, making it impossible to prioritise the repairs and maintenance required to keep it in usable shape. Various non-destructive tests were used to rate the elevated service reservoir in the current study (NDTs). The Condition Index (CI) of the ESR was determined using the DER (degree (D), extent (E), and relevance (R) rating technique. After determining the current structure's condition ranking, the Principal Component approach (PCA) was used to conduct a statistical analysis. The PCA shows a variation of 70.56% between the experiment's variables. The DER is given by PCA, and it’s ranking according to its CI is also significantly connected. In comparison to D and E, R has a stronger association with recognised zones or levels. PCA verified the findings by providing a good fit to the data in the experiment. The composite sustainable index technique is quite useful for predicting the strength and operational capacities of an existing ESR. CI also clarifies the future of the ESR, whether it is for maintenance, retrofitting, or demolition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ibrahim M, Ahmad A, Barry MS et al (2020) Durability of structural lightweight concrete containing expanded perlite aggregate. Int J Concrete Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00425-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nayak CB, Thakare SB (2019) Seismic performance of existing water tank after condition ranking using non-destructive testing. Int J Adv Struct Eng 11:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-019-00241-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinha R, Shiradhonkar SR (2012) Seismic Damage Index for classification of structural damage—closing the loop. 15 Wcee 98(2941):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kankanamge R, Kalum W, De Silva S et al (2020) Condition assessment of existing water retaining structures. In: 11th international conference on sustainable built environment (ICSBE) 2020

  5. Cavazos JS, González G, Kharissova OV et al (2017) Effect of nanoparticles on mechanical properties of cement-sand mortar applications. Adv Chem Eng Sci 7:270–276. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2017.73020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borucka-Lipska J (2016) Acid resistance, water permeability and chloride penetrability of concrete containing crushed basalt as aggregates. Neural Comput Appl 31:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra A, Singh M, Srivastava A (2017) RC Jacketing on RCC frame of overhead water tank using results of non destructive testing—a case study. In: 6th international conference on structural engineering and construction management

  8. Bozorgmehrnia S, Ranjbar MM, Madandoust R (2013) Seismic behavior assessment of concrete elevated water tanks. J Rehabil Civ Eng 1:69–79. https://doi.org/10.22075/jrce.2013.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaikwad M, Mangulkar M (2013) Comparison between static and dynamic analysis of elevated water tank. Int J Sci Eng Res 4:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taufiq RS (2000) State of the art of tank structural evaluation review: a case study of an elevated concrete water tank concerning crack initiation. J Transp Eng 126:491–502

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sahoo KK, Sarkar P, Davis R (2019) Mechanical properties of silica fume concrete designed as per construction practice. Proc Inst Civ Eng Constr Mater 172:20–28. https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.16.00085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herki BMA (2020) Lightweight concrete using local natural lightweight aggregate. J Crit Rev 7:490–497. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.04.93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellum RR, Al Khazaleh M, Pilla RK et al (2022) Effect of slag on strength, durability and microstructural characteristics of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. J Build Pathol Rehabil 7:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00163-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Z, Li K, Li Z (2019) Prediction of concrete compressive strength based on principal component analysis and radial basis function neural network. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/677/2/022045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kajian JR, Javaid S, Duggal EAK (2020) Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the maintenance of city roads—a review. Int Res J Eng Technol 7:1875–1878

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roux MP, Taute A (2016) Calculation of condition indices for road structures using a deduct points method. In: Proceedings of the 35th southern African transport conference (SATC 2016), pp 268–278

  17. Gajanan V, Awadhutkar PSL (2021) Health assessment of ESR employing condition ranking technique to check need of repair and retrofitting. Int Res J Eng Technol 8:966–978

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moosavi R, Grunwald M, Redmer B (2020) Crack detection in reinforced concrete. NDT E Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hasannejad M, Berenjian J, Pouraminian M, Sadeghi Larijani A (2021) Studying of microstructure, interface transition zone and ultrasonic wave velocity of high strength concrete by different aggregates. J Build Pathol Rehabil 7:9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00146-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wons M, Camara L, Esteves I et al (2021) Evaluation of concrete self-healing with different fly ash contents and cracking ages by means of ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength tests. J Build Pathol Rehabil 6:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-021-00104-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaikuthali SA, Mannan MA, Dawood ET et al (2019) Workability and compressive strength properties of normal weight concrete using high dosage of fly ash as cement replacement. J Build Pathol Rehabil 4:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-019-0065-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Indian Standard (1992) IS:13311 (part 2)—non destructive testing of concrete-methods of test—part 2 “Rebound Hammer”. In: Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS)

  23. Indian Standard (1996) IS: 13311 (part I)—1992, non-destructive testing of concrete methods of test (ultrasonic pulse velocity). In: Bureau of Indian Standard (BIS)

  24. Wankhade RL, Landage AB (2013) Non-destructive testing of concrete structures in karad region. Procedia Eng 51:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Darban S, Ghasemzadeh Tehrani H, Karballaeezadeh N (2020) Presentation a new method for determining of bridge condition index by using analytical hierarchy process. Preprints 2020030420. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0420.v1

  26. Bonnet J, Coll-Martínez E, Renou-Maissant P (2021) Evaluating sustainable development by composite index: evidence from French departments. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gómez-Limón JA, Arriaza M, Guerrero-Baena MD (2020) Building a composite indicator to measure environmental sustainability using alternative weighting methods. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patil H, Dwivedi A (2021) Prediction of properties of the cement incorporated with nanoparticles by principal component analysis (PCA) and response surface regression (RSR). Mater Today Proc 43:1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hameed MM, AlOmar MK, Baniya WJ, AlSaadi MA (2021) Incorporation of artificial neural network with principal component analysis and cross-validation technique to predict high-performance concrete compressive strength. Asian J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00362-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu K, Jin Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Review for order reduction based on proper orthogonal decomposition and outlooks of applications in mechanical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 123:264–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Artigue H, Smith G, Artigue H, Smith G (2019) Cogent mathematics & statistics the principal problem with principal components regression the principal problem with principal components regression. Cogent Math Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742558.2019.1622190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Patil H, Dwivedi A (2021) Impact of nano ZnO particles on the characteristics of the cement mortar. Innov Infrastruct Solut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00588-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding is available.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sandip University, Nashik, MS, 422213, India

    Shrikant Baviskar & Arunkumar Dwivedi

  2. Sandip Institute of Engineering and Management Nasik, Nashik, MS, 422213, India

    Hiteshkumar Patil

Authors
  1. Shrikant Baviskar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arunkumar Dwivedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiteshkumar Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shrikant Baviskar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author declares that they have no financial or personal conflicts of interest that might have impacted the research reported in this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baviskar, S., Dwivedi, A. & Patil, H. Analysis and development of the Composite Sustainable Condition Index for elevated service reservoir (ESR) by DER method. J Build Rehabil 7, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00177-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-022-00177-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation