1 Correction to: Jindal Global Law Review (2020) 11(1):157–179 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-020-00118-1

The original article was corrected.

In the original publication of the article, there were certain factual errors. The correct facts are listed below; all additions/modifications are in italics–

  1. 1.

    In the introduction on p. 158, the seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth lines should read, ‘In response, he spent the next many years in Gujarat building Nyayagraha — a widely noted collaborative experiment for legal justice in communal riots cases.’

  2. 2.

    On p. 159, the sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth lines should read, ‘In June 2020, the Delhi Police named Mander in several charge sheets of the riot cases. While at the time of writing the police had not named Mander as an accused, the charge sheets suggested that Mander’s speech during the protests incited violence.’

  3. 3.

    On p. 160, in the seventeenth line, it has been incorrectly stated that the Muzaffarnagar violence took place in 2014; the year in which the violence had broken out is 2013.

  4. 4.

    On p. 162, the eighth and ninth lines should read, ‘In the end, it is true that the guilt of Mr Narendra Modi and indeed a range of police officers and the others guilty could not be established in courts of law.’

  5. 5.

    On p. 165, the mention of Gujarat is to be omitted from the thirty-sixth line which should instead read, ‘I remember in my many conversations in Muzaffarnagar where more than 50 or 60 percent people were displaced and never able to return to their homes.’

  6. 6.

    On p. 169, in the fourth line, the name of the cantonment has been mistakenly mentioned as Mahua; the correct name is Mhow.

  7. 7.

    On p. 170, the fourteenth line should read, ‘Crowds do not naturally gather.’

  8. 8.

    On p. 175, the eighth and ninth lines should read, ‘This goes back to the point that it is not that officials do not have enough powers to control the violence.’

The editors regret these errors.