Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Study of Braced Retaining Piles with Asymmetrical Excavation

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, asymmetrical and symmetrical pile length model tests were performed to investigate the interaction between retaining piles with asymmetrical excavation. The deformation, earth pressure, and bending moment of the retaining pile on both sides were measured during asymmetrical excavation. The numerical analysis using PLAXIS 2D was validated by comparing the results with experimental data. Through numerical studies, the horizontal displacement, bending moment, and earth pressure of the piles were studied with asymmetrical excavation in terms of three design factors: asymmetrical pile length, pile stiffness, and bracing stiffness. Results show that asymmetrical excavation induces a “push-back effect”, and the pile-top displacement on the shallower side decreases from 0.54 mm to 0.49 mm and from 0.47 mm to 0.42 mm for asymmetrical and symmetrical pile lengths, respectively. The deformation, earth pressure, and bending moment of the retaining pile develop asymmetrically during asymmetrical excavation. The lateral earth pressure distribution was closely related to pile deformation, while the pile bending moment was related to the lateral earth pressure and the axial force of the bracing. With a decrease in the retaining pile stiffness and an increase in the bracing stiffness, the deformation mode of the retaining pile transitioned from a cantilever type to a bulging type, which further influences the distribution of earth pressure on the retaining pile and the distribution of the pile bending moment. For asymmetrical excavation, a deformation-based asymmetrical design for the retaining pile length is recommended to make good use of the push-back effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Liu B, Zhang D, Xi P (2019) Influence of vehicle load mode on the response of an asymmetrically-loaded deep excavation. KSCE J Civ Eng 23:3315–3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-0511-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo P, Gong X, Wang Y (2019) Displacement and force analyses of braced structure of deep excavation considering unsymmetrical surcharge effect. Comput Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu S, Yang J, Fu J, Zheng X (2019) Performance of a deep excavation irregular supporting structure subjected to asymmetric loading. Int J Geomech 19(7):05019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ou X, Zhang X, Fu J, Zhang C, Zhou X, Feng H (2020) Cause investigation of large deformation of a deep excavation support system subjected to unsymmetrical surface loading. Eng Fail Anal 107:104202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang W, Wu N, Jia P, Zhou X, Li H, Wang G (2021) Study of the mechanical performance of excavation under asymmetrical pressure and reinforcement measures. Arab J Geosci 14:1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07846-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trojnar K (2023) Experimental and numerical investigation of lateral loaded flexible hybrid piles in sand. Int J Civil Eng 21:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00736-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury SS, Deb K, Sengupta A (2016) Effect of fines on behavior of braced excavation in sand: experimental and numerical study. Int J Phys Model Geotech 16(1):04015018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng X, Zheng G, Diao Y, Huang T, Deng C, Nie D, Lei Y (2017) Experimental study of the progressive collapse mechanism of excavations retained by cantilever piles. Can Geotech J 54:574–587. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu C, Ding H, Luo W, Chen Q, Deng J (2020) Experimental and numerical study on performance of long-short combined retaining piles. Geomech Eng 20(3):255–265

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan B, Li Z, Chen W, Luo Q, Yang G, Wang Y (2022) Experimental study on lateral cyclic loading model of pile-soil system based on PIV technique and fractal theory. Chin J Rock Mechanics Eng 42(02):466–482

    Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM D2487–17E01 (2017) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM Internat West Conshohocken. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01.www.astm.org

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chevalier B, Combe G, Villard P (2012) Experimental and discrete element modelling studies of the trapdoor problem: influence of the macro-mechanical frictional parameters. Acta Geotech 7:15–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-011-0152-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu C, Liang L, Chen Q, Luo W, Chen YF (2019) Experimental study of soil arching effect under seepage condition. Acta Geotech 14:2031–2044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00769-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin H, Lei G, Xu L, Lei G (2012) Similarity analysis of deflection behavior of laterally loaded piles in 1g model tests. J Cent South Uni (Sci Technol) 43(9):3639–3645

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sedran G, Stolle DF, Horvath RG (2001) An investigation of scaling and dimensional analysis of axially loaded piles. Can Geotech J 38:530–541. https://doi.org/10.1139/t00-122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garnier J, Gaudin C, Springman SM, Culligan PJ, Goodings D, Konig D, Kutter B, Phillips R, Randolph MF, Thorel L (2007) Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling. Int J Phys Model Geotech 7:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1680/ijpmg.2007.070301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nunez IL. Driving and tension loading of piles in sand on a centrifuge (1988) In Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 88, Paris. Edited by J.F. Corté. Balkema, Rotterdam pp. 353–362

  18. Remaud D (1999) Pieux sous charges latérales: Etude expérimentale de l’effet de groupe. Thése de Doctorat de l’Université de Nantes

  19. Fioravante V (2002) On the shaft friction modelling of non-displacement piles in sand. Soils Found 42(2):23–33. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.42.2_23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng G, Lei Y, Cheng X, Li X, Wang R (2021) Experimental study on progressive collapse mechanism in braced and tied-back retaining systems of deep excavations. Can Geotech J 58:540–564. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chavda JT, Solanki CH, Desai AK (2019) Lateral response of contiguous pile wall subjected to staged excavation: physical and numerical investigations. Indian Geotech J 49:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0267-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaky J (1948) Pressure in soils. Proc 2nd Int Conf Soil Mech Found Eng, Rotterdam, Netherlands 103–107

  23. Bang S (1985) Active earth pressure behind retaining walls. J Geotech Eng 111(3):407–412. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(407)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jardine RJ, Potts DM, Fourie AB, Burland JB (1986) Studies of the influence of nonlinear stress-strain characteristics in soil structure interaction. Géotechnique 36(3):377–396. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang T, Deng T, Deng Y, Yu X, Zou P, Deng Z (2023) Numerical simulation of deep excavation considering strain-dependent behavior of soil: a case study of Tangluo Street Station of Nanjing Metro. Int J Civ Eng 21:541–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00755-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clayton CRI, Khatrush SA (1986) A new device for measuring local axial strains on triaxial specimens. Géotechnique 36(4):593–597. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.4.593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clayton CRI (2011) Stiffness at small strain: research and practice. Géotechnique 61(1):5–37. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2011.61.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cudny M, Truty A (2020) Refinement of the Hardening Soil model within the small strain range. Acta Geotech 15(8):2031–2051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00945-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S, Finno RJ (2019) Inverse analysis of a supported excavation in Chicago. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 145(9):04019050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ardakani A, Bayat M, Javanmard M (2014) Numerical modeling of soil nail walls considering Mohr Coulomb, hardening soil and hardening soil with small-strain stiffness effect models. Geomech Eng 6(4):391–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mu LL, Huang MS (2016) Small strain based method for predicting three-dimensional soil displacements induced by braced excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 52:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ng CWW, Zheng G, Ni JJ, Zhou C (2020) Use of unsaturated small-strain soil stiffness to the design of wall deflection and ground movement adjacent to deep excavation. Comput Geotech 119:103375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Benz T, Schwab R, Vermeer P (2007) Incorporating small-strain stiffness into geotechnical analysis. Bautechnik 84(11):749–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/bate.200710063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hardin BO, Drnevich VP (1972) Shear modulus and damping in soils: Design equations and curves. J Soil Mech Found Div 98(SM7):667–692. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Li L, Liu J, Li K, Huang H, Ji X (2019) Study of parameters selection and applicability of HSS model in typical stratum of Jinan. Rock Soil Mech 40(10):4021–4029

    Google Scholar 

  36. Liang F, Jia Y, Ding Y, Huang M (2017) Experimental study on parameters of HSS model for soft soils in Shanghai. Chin J Geotech Eng 39(02):269–278

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gu X, Wu R, Liang F, Gao G (2021) On HSS model parameters for Shanghai soils with engineering verification. Rock Soil Mech 42(03):833–845

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fan X, Xu C, Liang L, Chen QZ, Deng J (2021) Analytical solution for displacement-dependent passive earth pressure on rigid walls with various wall movements in cohesionless soil. Comput Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ou CY, Liao J, Cheng W (2000) Building response and ground movements induced by a deep excavation. Géotechnique 50:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50.3.209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang D, Phoon KK, Huang H, Hu Q (2015) Characterization of model uncertainty for cantilever deflections in undrained clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141:04014088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFC3009400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52308379 and 51878276), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQ23E080002 and No. LQ22E080009), and the National Science Fund of Jiangxi Province (20223BBG71018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changjie Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, X., Xu, C., Liang, L. et al. Experimental and Numerical Study of Braced Retaining Piles with Asymmetrical Excavation. Int J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00959-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00959-0

Keywords

Navigation