Skip to main content

Prediction of Shear Capacity of Flange-to-Flange Connectors of Double-Tee Beams Under Static and Cyclic Loading Conditions

Abstract

Double-tees used as roofs and floors in commercial buildings and parking garages are generally joined by mechanical connectors to form floor systems. The in-plane behavior of a double-tee diaphragm depends on the properties of the flange-type connectors. In this study, three types of double-tee flange-to-flange connectors—C-plate–bar and bow-shaped connectors in untopped double-tees and H-plate–bar connectors in pretopped double-tees—are investigated and their behavior under shear loading is examined. These connectors are simulated using the finite element method (FEM), and the modeling results are compared to the experimental assessment findings of the selected connectors. The failure modes, hysteretic behavior, deformation capacity, ductility, and shear capacity of the double-tee connectors are elucidated in this paper. The FEM analysis results show good agreement with the experimental ones in terms of the shear capacity of the connectors, with approximately 20% error at most. The diameter of the anchor bars and the thickness of the steel plates are revealed to have particular effects on the strength of the connectors. Specifically, using large-diameter anchor bars changes the shear capacity of the connectors to a certain extent, with a maximum increase of 11%. Modified truss and modified shear friction models are developed to accurately estimate the shear capacity of the three connectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

References

  1. PCI Industry Handbook Committee (2010) PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, 7th edn. PCI, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang D, Fleischman RB (2016) Establishment of performance-based seismic design factors for precast concrete floor diaphragms. Earthq Eng Struct D 45(5):675–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dal Lago B, Bianchi S, Biondini F (2019) Diaphragm effectiveness of precast concrete structures with cladding panels under seismic action. B Earthq Eng 17(1):473–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0452-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dal Lago B, Ferrara L (2018) Efficacy of roof-to-beam mechanical connections on the diaphragm behaviour of precast decks with spaced roof elements. Eng Struct 176:681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaikh AF, Feile EP (2004) Load testing of a precast concrete double-tee flange connector. PCI J 49(3): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012004.84.94

  6. Pincheira JA, Oliva MG, Kusumo-Rahardjo FI (1998) Tests on double tee flange connectors subjected to monotonic and cyclic loading. PCI J 43(3): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011998.82.96

  7. Pincheira JA, Oliva MG, Zheng W (2005) Behavior of double-tee flange connectors subjected to in-plane monotonic and reversed cyclic loads. PCI J 50(6): 32–54. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11012005.32.54

  8. Cao L, Naito C (2009) Precast concrete double-tee connectors, part 2: Shear behavior. PCI J 54(2): 97. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012009.97.115

  9. Naito C, Ren R (2013) An evaluation method for precast concrete diaphragm connectors based on structural testing. PCI J 58(2): 106–118.https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij. 03012013.106.118

  10. Ren R, Naito CJ (2013) Precast concrete diaphragm connector performance database. J Struct Eng 139(1):15–27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anay R, Assi L, Soltangharaei V, Abdulshaheed A, Gleich H, Ziehl P (2020) Development of a double-tee flange connection using shape memory alloy rods. PCI J 65(6): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij65.6-03

  12. Hendricks R, Naito C, Osborn A (2018) Flange-to-flange double-tee connections subjected to vehicular loading, part 1: Numerical assessment approach. PCI J 63(4): 41–53. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij63.4-02

  13. Zhou W, Li H, Zhang W (2021) Behavior of flange connectors of precast prestressed double tees. ACI Struct J 118(6):7–18. https://doi.org/10.14359/51732992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Zhou W. Behavior of new types of flange connectors of precast double-tees. Struct Des Tall Spec(in press). https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1922

  15. ACI Committee 318 (2014) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. American Concrete Institute

  16. ABAQUS 2018 Documentation (2018) ABAQUS Manual, version 2018, Pawtucket, R.I

  17. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E (1989) A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct 25(3):299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J Eng Mech 124(8):892–900. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Genikomsou AS, Polak MA (2015) Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS. Eng Struct 98:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Minh HL, Khatir S, Wahab MA et al (2021) A concrete damage plasticity model for predicting the effects of compressive high-strength concrete under static and dynamic loads. J Build Eng 44:103239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the People’s Republic of China (2010) Code for design of concrete structures (GB50010-2010). China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  22. Légeron F, Paultre P, Mazars J (2005) Damage mechanics modeling of nonlinear seismic behavior of concrete structures. J Struct Eng 131(6):946–955. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:6(946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Santos PMD, Júlio ENBS (2012) A state-of-the-art review on shear-friction. Eng Struct 45:435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study presented in this paper is supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 52178126). The authors would like to thank our research workgroup for their efforts for the site experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Zhou.

Appendix

Appendix

\(C - PB - 50\) is C-plate bar connector in untopped double-tees

\(H - PB - 130\) is H-plate bar connector in pretopped double-tees

\(BS\) is bow-shaped connector in untopped double-tees

\(\sigma\) is the strength of concrete

\(d\) is the damage parameter

\(d_{c}\) is the compression damage parameter

\(d_{t}\) is the tension damage parameter

\(s_{c}\) is the compressive stiffness recovery

\(s_{t}\) is the tensile stiffness recovery

\(\varepsilon_{c}\) is the plastic compressive strain

\(\varepsilon_{t}\) is the plastic tensile strain

\(E_{s}\) is modulus of elasticity

\(\upsilon\) is the Poisson’s ratio

\(\psi\) is the dilation angle of concrete

\(K_{c}\) is the shape factor of concrete

\(\sigma_{b0}\) is biaxial compressive strength of concrete

\(\sigma_{c0}\) is uniaxial compressive strength of concrete

\(\varepsilon\) is the eccentricity of concrete

\(V_{m}\) is peak shear force

\(V_{FEA}\) is shear capacity obtained by FE method

\(V_{DESIGN}\) is shear capacity calculated by truss model or shear friction model

\(V_{MEASURED}\) is shear capacity obtained in the test

\(\Delta_{u}\) is deformation of connectors at failure

\(\Delta_{y}\) is deformation of connectors at yield

\(K\) is in-plane stiffness of connectors

\(\mu_{\Delta }\) is ductility coefficient

\(A_{s}\) is cross-sectional area of one anchorage bar of the connector

\(f_{y}\) is the yield strength of the anchorage bar

\(\mu\) is shear friction factor

\(\alpha_{1}\) is strength reduction factors of anchors

\(\alpha_{2}\) is strength reduction factors of concrete

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Zhou, W. Prediction of Shear Capacity of Flange-to-Flange Connectors of Double-Tee Beams Under Static and Cyclic Loading Conditions. Int J Civ Eng (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00763-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00763-8

Keywords

  • Double-tee
  • Connectors
  • Shear capacity
  • Finite element analysis
  • Parameter analysis