Skip to main content
Log in

Experiment and Finite-Element Analysis on Seismic Response of Y-Shaped Porcelain Column Circuit Breaker Equipped with SMA Cables

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taking LW10B-383W/YT4000 sulfur hexafluoride circuit breaker produced by Henan Pinggao Electric Co. LTD as the prototype, a 1/5 scale test model was designed and manufactured based on the similarity theory. Considering the seismic response characteristics and structural form of this electrical equipment, this paper discussed the method of damping control of circuit breaker model using SMA cables. First, the shaking table tests were carried out for the Y-shaped circuit breaker model with and without control under three scaled seismic records, and the ABAQUS finite-element analysis model was established by automatic surface meshing method. Then, the seismic response analysis was finished along X and Y directions, and the comparison between the finite element and the test results was adopted to examine the availability of the proposed analysis model. Finally, the dynamic response of the model and the damping effect of SMA cables under z direction earthquake excitation were discussed using finite-element method. The results show the finite-element analysis results of Y-shaped circuit breaker model are in good agreement with the test results, and the SMA cables can effectively suppress seismic response of circuit breaker. When the peak ground acceleration (PGA) is 800 gal, the maximum acceleration suppression ratio of the end of arcing porcelain bushing is about 35% and the maximum displacement suppression ratio is about 32.5%. Meanwhile, the root stress of porcelain casing is also efficiently decreased, the inhibition rate of peak root stress of supports porcelain casing is about 40% for horizontal seismic action, and that of arcing porcelain bushing is about 30% for vertical seismic action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xie Q, Wen J, Liu W (2021) Coupling effects of power substation equipment with multiple configurations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 150:106908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paolacci F, Giannini R (2009) Seismic reliability assessment of a high-voltage disconnect switch using an effective fragility analysis. J Earthq Eng 13(2):217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802347448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie Q, Yang Z, He C, Xue S (2019) Seismic performance improvement of a slender composite ultra-high voltage bypass switch using assembled base isolation. Eng Struct 194:320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xie Q, Zheng Y, He C, Yang Z (2020) Experimental and analytical study on seismic performance of +800 kV UHVDC composite post insulator interconnected by rigid bus. High Voltage Eng 46(2):626–633 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zareei SA, Hosseini M, Ghafory-Ashtiany M (2017) Evaluation of power substation equipment seismic vulnerability by multivariate fragility analysis: A case study on a 420 kV circuit breaker. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 92:79–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xue Y, Cheng Y, Zhu Z, Li S, Liu Z, Guo H, Zhang S, Paolacci F (2021) Study on seismic performance of porcelain pillar electrical equipment based on nonlinear dynamic theory. Adv Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8816322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai W, Dai J, Zhou H, Yang Y, Ning X (2017) Experimental and analytical studies on multiple tuned mass dampers for seismic protection of porcelain electrical equipment. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16:803–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-017-0416-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng Y, Li S, Lu Z, Liu Z, Zhu Z (2018) Seismic risk mitigation of cylindrical electrical equipment with a novel isolation device. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 111:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li S, Tsang HH, Cheng Y, Lu Z (2018) Seismic testing and modeling of cylindrical electrical equipment with GFRP composite insulators. Compos Struct 194:454–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alessandri S, Giannini R, Paolacci F, Malena M (2015) Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 1: preliminary tests and analyses. Eng Struct 98:251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alessandri S, Giannini R, Paolacci F, Amoretti M, Freddo A (2015) Seismic retrofitting of an HV circuit breaker using base isolation with wire ropes. Part 2: Shaking-table test validation. Eng Struct 98:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah AM, Bhalja BR (2014) A laboratory prototype and simulation of ground constant measurement of circuit breaker. J Inst Eng (India) 96(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40031-014-0086-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma H, Cho C (2008) Feasibility study on a superelastic SMA damper with re-centring capability. Mater Sci Eng A 473(1–2):290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Zhu S (2007) A shape memory alloy-based reusable hysteretic damper for seismic hazard mitigation. Smart Mater Struct 16(5):1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/16/5/014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Indirli M, Castellano MG (2008) Shape memory alloy devices for the structural improvement of masonry heritage structures. Int J Archit Herit 2(2):93–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050701636258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiwari ND, Gogoi A, Hazra B, Wang Q (2020) A shape memory alloy-tuned mass damper inerter system for passive control of linked-SDOF structural systems under seismic excitation. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abraik E (2021) Numerical study for the impact of torsional amplification on the seismic response of self-centring braces equipped with different shape memory alloy materials. Structures 32:505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen HD, Choi E, Nguyen SN, Pham TK (2021) Performance of self-centering devices containing superelastic SMA bars and their application via finite element analysis. Eng Struct 237:112113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sheikhi J, Fathi M, Rahnavard R, Napolitano R (2021) Numerical analysis of natural rubber bearing equipped with steel and shape memory alloys dampers. Structures 32:1839–1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhuang P, Wang W, Li Y, Han M (2021) Cyclic behavior of an adaptive seismic isolation system combining a double friction pendulum bearing and shape memory alloy cables. Smart Mater Struct 30(7):075003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abfb80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirzahosseini M, Gerami M (2018) The effect of temperature on seismic response of Cu–Al–Mn SMA braced frame. Int J Civil Eng 16:1687–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0321-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhan M, Liu J, Wang D, Chen X, Zhang L, Wang S (2021) Optimized neural network prediction model of shape memory alloy and its application for structural vibration control. Materials 14(21):6593. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14216593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhan M, Zhang L, Chen X, Wang S (2022) Dynamic response control of engineering structure equipped with smart compound damper. Proc Inst Civil Eng 175(2):129–140. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guo M, Zou Y, Sun H (2021) Analysis of similarity theory of shaking table model test. J Shenyang Jianzhu Univ (Natl Sci) 37(4):594–601 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kagawa T, Sato M, Minowa C, Abe A, Tazoh T (2004) Centrifuge simulations of large-scale shaking table tests: case studies. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(7):663–672. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:7(663)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. IEEE Standard 693 (2005) Recommended practice for seismic design of substations. Institute of electrical and electronic engineers, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  27. GB50260–13 (2013) Code for seismic design of electric power facilities. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, China.

  28. Lim JS, Jeong YD, Yi ST (2018) Natural frequency and damping ratio of steel plate–concrete walls with inclined studs under forced oscillation. Mag Concr Res 70(14):703–713. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.17.00207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun WP, Sun YH, Yu YP, Wu BS (2018) A comparison of the improved and classic half-power bandwidth methods in estimating damping for multi-DOF systems. J Vib Eng Technol 6:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-018-0034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao B, Chen Y, Liu C, Wu H, Wang T, Wei X (2019) An axial semi-rigid connection model for cross-type transverse branch plate-to-CHS joints. Eng Struct 181:413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao B, Liu C, Wu H, Ge Y, Yang J, Yi Q (2019) Study on out-of-plane flexural stiffness of unstiffened multi-planar CHS X-joints. Eng Struct 188:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao B, Ke LC, Hong L (2020) Computational model for the flexural capacity and stiffness of eccentric RHS X-connections under brace out-of-plane bending moment. J Struct Eng 146(3):04019227. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu C, Luo X, Fang D, Shi C, Sarvar S, Zhao B (2019) Study on flexural stiffness of diagrid non-stiffened node based on four-spring assemblage model. Eng Struct 198:109500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu C, Zhao B, Yang J, Yi Q, Yao Z, Wu J (2020) Effects of brace-to-chord angle on capacity of multi-planar CHS X-joints under out-of-plane bending moments. Eng Struct 211:110434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678480), Science and Technology Project of ministry of Housing and Urban-rural Development (2020- K-127), Henan province key projects of science and technology (222102320311, 222102320199), Ningxia natural science foundation (2021AAC03189), Zhumadian major projects of science and technology (19005), Cultivating Project of National Natural Science Fund (XKPY-202009), Youth Backbone Teacher Training Program of Henan Province.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant no [51678480].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Zhan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhan, M., Zhang, L., Chen, X. et al. Experiment and Finite-Element Analysis on Seismic Response of Y-Shaped Porcelain Column Circuit Breaker Equipped with SMA Cables. Int J Civ Eng 20, 1211–1227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00725-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-022-00725-0

Keywords

Navigation