Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Shared Autonomous Vehicles into Existing Transportation Services: Evidence from a Paratransit Service in Arlington, Texas

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the potential benefits of integrating shared autonomous vehicles and an existing transportation system by exploring a recently initiated project that integrates autonomous vehicles (AVs) with an existing on-demand ridesharing service, Via, in Arlington, Texas. We first identified the spatial patterns of the ridership on a localized scale, using geographically weighted regression (GWR) for the existing paratransit service, Handitran. Assuming that the existing ridership will be combined in the future with shared autonomous vehicles, we looked at integration options, based on the spatial patterns of supply and demand and payment options for the riders. The results suggest that the paratransit service, Handitran, is currently used by a small proportion of the eligible population, whose travel patterns differ based on their age. For instance, younger users usually ride Handitran for traveling to work, recreational activities, and routine chores, while senior riders often use the service for medical and recreational trips. The results of the GWR model indicate that the major determinants of Handitran usage are the population’s percentage of older adults, racial distribution, and household vehicle ownership; the coefficients of these factors vary across the city. Hot-spot analyses’ results reveal that integrating the services will improve the efficiency of the existing transportation system by responding to the excess rider demand, particularly in the downtown area. Finally, we describe the implications of implementing policies for AV integration for cities, service providers, and other stakeholders and suggest future research topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An app based, on-demand ride service providing shared rides at subsidized rates in the City of Arlington, TX.

  2. Via’s service area was expanded to the entire city of Arlington in January 2021.

References

  1. Murphy C, Feigon S (2016) Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.17226/23578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diana M, Quadrifoglio L, Pronello C (2009) A methodology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equivalent fixed-route and demand responsive transit services. Transp Plan Technol 32:377–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060903119618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Quadrifoglio L (2009) Optimal zone design for feeder transit services. Transp Res Rec 2111:100–108. https://doi.org/10.3141/2111-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li X, Quadrifoglio L (2010) Feeder transit services: choosing between fixed and demand responsive policy. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 18:770–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.05.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qiu F, Li W, Haghani A (2015) A methodology for choosing between fixed-route and flex-route policies for transit services. J Adv Transp 49:496–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Curtis T, Merritt M, Chen C, Perlmutter D, Berez D, Ellis B (2019) Partnerships Between Transit Agencies and Transportation Network Companies (TNCs). TCRP Res Rep (Project J-11/Task 26)

  7. Afandizadeh Zargari S, Shakoori S, Mirzahossein H, Karimi M (2021) Optimizing algorithm for allocating passengers in shared taxis. Int J Transp Eng 9:503–520. https://doi.org/10.22119/ijte.2021.279482.1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham S, Charlton M (1998) Geographically Weighted Regression-Modelling Spatial Non-Stationarity. J R Stat Soc Ser Stat 47:431–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levin MW, Odell M, Samarasena S, Schwartz A (2019) A linear program for optimal integration of shared autonomous vehicles with public transit. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 109:267–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen Y, Zhang H, Zhao J (2018) Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: a supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 113:125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen J, Chen YX, Nassir N, Zhao J (2018) Transit-oriented autonomous vehicle operation with integrated demand-supply interaction. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 97:216–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 40:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stocker A, Shaheen S (2017) Shared automated vehicles: review of business models. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenblatt J, Saxena S (2015) Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nat Clim Change 5:860–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bansal P, Kockelman K, Singh A (2016) Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an Austin perspective. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 67:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilgarter K, Granig P (2020) Public perception of autonomous vehicles: a qualitative study based on interviews after riding an autonomous shuttle. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 72:226–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard D, Dai D (2014) Public perceptions of self-driving cars: The case of Berkeley, California. In: Transportation research board 93rd annual meeting Vol. 14, No. 4502, pp 1–16

  18. Lu Z, Du R, Dunham-Jones E, Park H, Crittenden J (2017) Data-enabled public preferences inform integration of autonomous vehicles with transit-oriented development in Atlanta. Cities 63:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nazari F, Noruzoliaee M, Mohammadian A (2018) Shared versus private mobility: modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 97:456–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang SK, Schonfeld PM (1991) Integration of fixed-and flexible-route bus systems. Transportation Research Record (1308)

  21. Kloostra B, Roorda MJ (2019) Fully autonomous vehicles: analyzing transportation network performance and operating scenarios in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada. Transp Plan Technol 42:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2019.1565159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aldaihani MM, Quadrifoglio L, Dessouky MM, Hall R (2004) Network design for a grid hybrid transit service. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 38:511–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson NHM, Hendrickson C (1980) Performance models of flexibly routed transportation services. Transp Res Part B Methodol 14:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(80)90033-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marczuk KA, Hong HSS, Azevedo CML, Adnan M, Pendleton SD, Frazzoli E (2015) Autonomous mobility on demand in simmobility: Case study of the central business district in Singapore. In 2015 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation, and Mechatronics (RAM) IEEE, pp 167-172

  25. Spieser K, Treleaven K, Zhang R, Frazzoli E, Morton D, Pavone M (2014) Toward a systematic approach to the design and evaluation of automated mobility-on-demand systems: a case study in Singapore. In: Meyer G, Beiker S (eds) Road vehicle automation. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 229–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Berrada J, Poulhès A (2021) Economic and socioeconomic assessment of replacing conventional public transit with demand responsive transit services in low-to-medium density areas. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 150:317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Iacobucci R, McLellan B, Tezuka T (2018) Modeling shared autonomous electric vehicles: potential for transport and power grid integration. Energy 158:148–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang X, de Almeida Correia GH, van Arem B (2016) Optimizing the service area and trip selection of an electric automated taxi system used for the last mile of train trips. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 93:115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vakayil A, Gruel W, Samaranayake S (2017) Integrating shared-vehicle mobility-on-demand systems with public transit (No. 17-05439)

  30. Lewis J, Grecu I, Grecu G (2020) Integrating the autonomous vehicle infrastructure into urban spaces: the social dynamics of data-driven mobilities. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice 12:72–78. https://doi.org/10.22381/CRLSJ121202010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yap MD, Correia G, van Arem B (2016) Preferences of travellers for using automated vehicles as last mile public transport of multimodal train trips. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 94:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang Y, Khani A (2021) Integrating transit systems with ride-sourcing services: a study on the system users’ stochastic equilibrium problem. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 150:95–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Ketankumar Patel R, Kermanshachi S, Michael Rosenberger J, Weinreich D, Foss A (2021) Integration of shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) into existing transportation services: a focus group study. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect 12:100481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Martinez LM, Viegas JM (2017) Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: an agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon, Portugal. Int J Transp Sci Technol 6:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu S, Kornhauser A (2017) The interplay between fleet size, level-of-service, and empty vehicle repositioning strategies in large-scale, shared-ride autonomous taxi mobility-on-demand scenarios (No. 17-05960)

  36. Arcury TA, Gesler WM, Preisser JS, Sherman J, Spencer J, Perin J (2005) The effects of geography and spatial behavior on health care utilization among the residents of a rural region. Health Serv Res 40:135–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00346.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Böcker L, van Amen P, Helbich M (2017) Elderly travel frequencies and transport mode choices in Greater Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Transportation 44:831–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9680-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cui J, Loo BPY, Lin D (2017) Travel behaviour and mobility needs of older adults in an ageing and car-dependent society. Int J Urban Sci 21:109–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2016.1262785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rahman MM, Strawderman L, Adams-Price C, Turner JJ (2016) Transportation alternative preferences of the aging population. Travel Behav Soc 4:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2015.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Szeto WY, Yang L, Wong RCP, Li YC, Wong SC (2017) Spatio-temporal travel characteristics of the elderly in an ageing society. Travel Behav Soc 9:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Harrington J (2018) Travelers take note: these large cities in America offer no public transportation. In: USA TODAY. https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/america/fifty-states/2018/12/04/americas-largest-cities-with-no-public-transportation/38628503/. Accessed 18 Nov 2020

  42. Arif Khan M, Shahmoradi A, Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Kermanshachi S, Michael Rosenberger J (2021) Travel Behaviors of the Transportation-Disabled Population and Impacts of Alternate Transit Choices: A Trip Data Analysis of the Handitran Paratransit Service in Arlington, TX pp 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483534.043

  43. Arif Khan M, Shahmoradi A, Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Kermanshachi S, Michael Rosenberger JA (2021) Geographically Weighted Regression Approach to Modeling the Determinants of On-Demand Ride Services for Elderly and Disabled. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development, pp 385–396

  44. Dziauddin MF, Powe N, Alvanides S (2015) Estimating the effects of light rail transit (LRT) system on residential property values using geographically weighted regression (GWR). Appl Spat Anal Policy 8:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-014-9117-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Matthews SA, Yang T-C (2012) Mapping the results of local statistics: using geographically weighted regression. Demogr Res 26:151–166. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu C, Zhang X, Zhou M, He S, Gan M, Yang L, Wang K (2020) Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China. Ecol Indic 117:106654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Levene M (2018) Jensen-Shannon Divergence as a Goodness-of-Fit Measure for Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Curve Fitting. arXiv:1809.11052

  48. Raposo F, Barceló D (2021) Assessment of goodness-of-fit for the main analytical calibration models: guidelines and case studies. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 143:116373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Braga AA, Zimmerman G, Barao L, Farrell C, Brunson RK, Papachristos AV (2019) Street gangs, gun violence, and focused deterrence: comparing place-based and group-based evaluation methods to estimate direct and spillover deterrent effects. J Res Crime Delinq 56:524–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427818821716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jones RR, VoPham T, Sevilla B, Airola M, Flory A, Deziel NC, Nuckols JR, Pronk A, Laden F, Ward MH (2019) Verifying locations of sources of historical environmental releases of dioxin-like compounds in the U.S.: implications for exposure assessment and epidemiologic inference. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 29:842–851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0079-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sealy-Jefferson S, Butler B, Chettri S, Elmi H, Stevens A, Bosah C, Dailey R, Misra DP (2021) Neighborhood evictions, marital/cohabiting status, and preterm birth among African American women. Ethn Dis 31:197–204. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.31.2.197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Trudeau D, Kaplan J (2016) Is there diversity in the New Urbanism? Analyzing the demographic characteristics of New Urbanist neighborhoods in the United States. Urban Geogr 37:458–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1069029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gupta D, Chen H-W, Miller LA, Surya F (2010) Improving the efficiency of demand-responsive paratransit services. Transp Res Part Policy Pract 44:201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Boschmann EE, Brady SA (2013) Travel behaviors, sustainable mobility, and transit-oriented developments: a travel counts analysis of older adults in the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. J Transp Geogr 33:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rosenbloom S (2001) No title found. Transportation 28:375–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011802707259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gurumurthy KM, Kockelman KM (2020) Modeling Americans’ autonomous vehicle preferences: a focus on dynamic ride-sharing, privacy & long-distance mode choices. Technol Forecast Soc Change 150:119792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Krueger R, Rashidi TH, Rose JM (2016) Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 69:343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Ketankumar Patel R, Kermanshachi S, Michael Rosenberger J, Weinreich D (2021) Exploring Concerns and Preferences towards Using Autonomous Vehicles as a Public Transportation Option: Perspectives from a Public Focus Group Study. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development pp 344–354

  59. Patel RK, Etminani-Ghasrodashti R, Kermanshachi S, Rosenberger JM, Weinreich D (2021) Exploring Preferences towards Integrating the Autonomous Vehicles with the Current Microtransit Services: A Disability Focus Group Study. In: International Conference on Transportation and Development pp 355–366

  60. Liljamo T, Liimatainen H, Pöllänen M (2018) Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 59:24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Haboucha CJ, Ishaq R, Shiftan Y (2017) User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 78:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented herein is a part of the Arlington RAPID (Rideshare, Automation, and Payment Integration Demonstration) project, which is supported by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Integrated Mobility Innovation (IMI) Program funded by the United States Department of Transportation and City of Arlington. The RAPID project is a collaboration among different partners including the City of Arlington, Via, May Mobility, and UTA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions and Dollars (CTEDD), University of Texas at Arlington, Woolf Hall Suite 324, 500 West First Street, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    Muhammad Arif Khan

  2. Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions and Dollars (CTEDD), University of Texas at Arlington, Woolf Hall Suite 325, 500 West First Street, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    Roya Etminani-Ghasrodashti

  3. Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Texas, Arlington, TX, 76010, USA

    Amir Shahmoradi

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington (UTA), Box 19308, Arlington, TX, 76019-0308, USA

    Sharareh Kermanshachi

  5. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington (UTA), Woolf Hall Room 420 D, 500 West First Street, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA

    Jay Michael Rosenberger

  6. Office of Strategic Initiatives, City of Arlington, 101 W Abram St, Arlington, TX, 76010, USA

    Ann Foss

Authors
  1. Muhammad Arif Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roya Etminani-Ghasrodashti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Shahmoradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sharareh Kermanshachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jay Michael Rosenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ann Foss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharareh Kermanshachi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, M.A., Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R., Shahmoradi, A. et al. Integrating Shared Autonomous Vehicles into Existing Transportation Services: Evidence from a Paratransit Service in Arlington, Texas. Int J Civ Eng 20, 601–618 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00698-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00698-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation