Improving the Characteristics of a Lean Clay by Electrokinetic Treatment

Abstract

An experimental study was carried out to investigate the effect of electrokinetic treatment on the axial load capacity of a deep foundation model, embedded in a soft clay. Three series of tests were carried out using five identical electrokinetic treatment cells under applied voltages of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 V. Intermittent and continuous electric currents were implemented in the first two series with the similar energy consumptions to investigate the effect of the type of current in the improvement. In third series of tests, current intermittence was used in four tests with different applied voltages of 5, 10, 15 and 20 while the energy consumption was kept the same in the tests. The electric current and energy consumption were periodically recorded during the tests. At the end of the electrokinetic treatment, the axial load capacity of the foundation model was determined. Vane shear tests along with liquid and plastic limits tests were also conducted on the soil after the treatment. The results showed that electrokinetics had significantly increased both the shear strength of the soil and axial load capacity of the foundation model and the increases were proportional to the energy consumption. In the third series, the increases in the load capacity were found to be similar in the four tests. The maximum axial load capacity after the treatment was 336 N compared to 19 N in the control test. It was found that using the intermittent current reduces the corrosion of electrode.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Liu S-Y, Cai G-H, Cao J-J, Wang F (2017) Influence of soil type on strength and microstructure of carbonated reactive magnesia-treated soil. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 24(2):248–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cristovao A, Figueres M, Pinto A, Rosa P (2016) Case study: preliminary field testing as a basis of design for ground improvement using vibrocompaction at Lome container Terminal-Togo. Proc Eng 143:1451–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Duan W, Cai G, Liu S, Yuan J, Puppala AJ (2019) Assessment of ground improvement by vibro-compaction method for liquefiable deposits from in-situ testing data. Int J Civ Eng 17:723–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jamshidi CR, Karimpour FM, Jamshidi CM, Shamsi SJ (2019) Physical and numerical modeling of stone column behavior in loose sand. Int J Civ Eng 17:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Abdi MR, Mirzaeifar H (2016) Effects of discrete short polypropylene fibers on behavior of artificially cemented kaolinite. Int J Civ Eng 14:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Anupam AK, Kumar P, Ransinchung GD (2016) Effect of fly ash and rice husk ash on permanent deformation behaviour of subgrade soil under cyclic triaxial loading. Transp Res Proc 2016(17):596–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Correia AG, Winter MG, Puppala AJ (2016) A review of sustainable approaches in transport infrastructure geotechnics. J Transp Geotech 2016(7):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Luo H-L, Hsiao D-H, Lin D-F, Lin C-K (2012) Cohesive soil stabilized using sewage sludge ash/cement and nano aluminum oxide. Int J Transp Sci Technol 1(1):83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Karkush MO, Ali SD (2019) Remediation of clayey soil contaminated with copper sulfate using washing-enhanced electrokinetics technique. Russ J Electrochem 55(12):1381–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Karkush MO, Ali SD (2019) Remediation of clay soil contaminated with lead nitrate using washing-enhanced electrokinetic technique. J Electrochem Sci Eng 9(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Alshawabkeh AN (2009) Electrokinetic soil remediation: challenges and opportunities. Sep Sci Technol 44(10):2171–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27(13):2638–2647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yeung AT, Gu YY (2011) A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 195:11–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hassan I, Mohamedelhassan E, Yanful E (2015) Solar powered electrokinetic remediation of Cu polluted soil using a novel anode configuration. Electrochim Acta 181:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Shenbaga R, Kaniraj HL, Huong J, Yee HS (2011) Electro-osmotic consolidation studies on peat and clayey silt using electric vertical drain. Geotech Geol Eng 29:277–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mohamedelhassan E, Shang JQ (2001) Effects of electrode materials and current intermittence in electro-osmosis. Ground Improvement 5(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yuan SH, Zheng ZH, Chen J, Lu XH (2009) Use of solar cell in electrokinetic remediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater 162:1583–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ryu BG, Yang JS, Kim DH, Baek K (2010) Pulsed electrokinetic removal of Cd and Zn from fine-grained soil. J Appl Electrochem 40

  19. 19.

    Jo SU, Kim DH, Yang JS, Baek K (2012) Pulse-enhanced electrokinetic restoration of sulfate-containing saline greenhouse soil. Electrochim Acta 86:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kim DH, Jo SU, Yoo JC, Baek K (2013) Ex situ pilot scale electrokinetic restoration of saline soil using pulsed current. Separation Purif Technol 120:282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Burland JB (1990) Compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Géotechnique 40(3):329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    ASTM D3080/D3080M-11, Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions (withdrawn 2020). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011, www.astm.org

  23. 23.

    ASTM D4767-11 (2020) Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020. www.astm.org

  24. 24.

    Cerato A, Lutenegger AJ (2007) Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(10):1192–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mohamedelhassan E (2009) Electrokinetic strengthening of soft clay. Ground Improvement 162(4):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Narasimhan B, Ranjan RS (2000) Electrokinetic barrier to prevent subsurface contaminant migration: theoretical model development and validation. J Contam Hydrol 42:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mohamedelhassan E, Shang JQ (2003) Electrokinetics-generated pore fluid and ionic transport in an offshore calcareous soil. Can Geotech J 40(6):1185–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Micic S, Shang JQ, Lo KY, Lee YN, Lee SW (2001) Electrokinetic strengthening of a marine sediment using intermittent current. Can Geotech J 38(2):287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lamont-Black J, Hall J, Glendinning S, White PC, Jones C (2012) Stabilization of a railway embankment using electrokinetic geosynthetics. Earthw Europe 26:125–139

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rittirong A, Shang JQ, Mohamedelhassan E, Ismail MA, Randolph MF (2008) Effects of electrode configuration on electrokinetic stabilization for caisson anchors in calcareous sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134(3):352–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Safuan A, Rashid A, Ridzuan A, Said K (2017) The deep mixing method: Bearing capacity studies. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1271–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kawasaki S, Akiyama M (2013) Enhancement of unconfined compressive strength of sand test pieces cemented with calcium phosphate compound by addition of various powders. Soils Found 53(6):966–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kishida K, Cui Y, Nonomura M, Iura T, Kimura M (2016) Discussion on the mechanism of ground improvement method at the excavation of shallow overburden tunnel in difficult ground. Underg Sp 1(2):94–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sukpunya A, Jotisankasan A (2016) Large simple shear testing of soft Bangkok clay stabilized with soil–cement-columns and its application. Soils Found 56(4):640–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) awarded to the second author.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ikrema Hassan or Eltayeb Mohamedelhassan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, I., Mohamedelhassan, E. Improving the Characteristics of a Lean Clay by Electrokinetic Treatment. Int J Civ Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-021-00604-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Electrokinetic treatment
  • Deep foundation
  • Ground improvement
  • Axial load capacity
  • Soft clay