Effect of Silt Content on Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine Saturated River Bed Sands


The effect of silt intrusion on the liquefaction susceptibility of fine saturated sand has been studied here using a series of strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests on isotropically consolidated soil specimens. The fine sands used in this study were collected from the Ganga and Sone river bed. The samples were prepared with 100% non-plastic silt, 100% sand and different percentage (5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) of non-plastic silt mixed with fine sand to study the effect of intruded silt on liquefaction susceptibility of sand. It has been found that at the same relative density range (10–25%) and the same percentage of intruded non-plastic silt, the Ganga sand is having higher liquefaction susceptibility than the Sone sand. The outcome of the study also showed that the rate of generation of excess pore water pressure (EPWP) for all three soil specimens was more or less same at higher strain levels (0.66–1.31%). However, the liquefaction potential continues to increase with the increase in silt content at a lower strain rate of 0.13%. A graphical relationship has been proposed for the EPWP development model parameter as a function of non-plastic silt content. This modification in the EPWP model parameter is one of the novel aspects presented here, which can be used for site-specific nonlinear ground response analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13


C c :

Coefficient of curvature

C u :

Coefficient of uniformity

D 10 :

Effective size of particles corresponding to 10% finer in the particle size distribution curve

D 30 :

Diameter of particles corresponding to 30% finer in the particle size distribution curve

D 50 :

Mean grain diameter

D 60 :

Diameter of particles corresponding to 60% finer in the particle size distribution curve

p, F and s :

EPWP Model parameter

\(\varepsilon\) :

Cyclic axial strain

\(\gamma_{{\text{c}}}\) :

Cyclic shear strain

\(\sigma_{{\text{h}}}^{\prime }\) :

Effective stress acting on the horizontal direction

\(\sigma_{m}^{\prime }\) :

Mean principal effective stress

\(\sigma_{{\text{v}}}^{\prime }\) :

Effective stress acting on soil on the vertical direction


  1. 1.

    Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2004) Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic failure of silts and clays. Neurosci Lett 339:123–126

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Boulanger RW, Idriss IM (2007) Evaluation of cyclic softening in silts and clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133:641–652. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(641)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bray JD, Sancio RB, Riemer MF, Durgunoglu T (2004) Liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference soil dynamics earthquake engineering, 3rd international conference earthquake geotechnical engineering, vol 1. Stallion Press, Singapore, pp 655–62. http://xn--zeta-85a.com.tr/docs/paperno61.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  4. 4.

    Taiebat M, Shahir H, Pak A (2007) Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kishida H (1970) Characteristics of liquefaction of level sandy ground during the Tokachioki earthquake. Soils Found 10:103–111. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1960.10.2_103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Duan W, Cai G, Liu S, Yuan J, Puppala AJ (2019) Assessment of ground improvement by vibro-compaction method for liquefiable deposits from in-situ testing data. Int J Civ Eng 17:723–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0348-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Andrews DCA, Martin GR (2000) Criteria for liquefaction of silty soils. In: Proceedings of 12th world conference earthquake engineerings, NZ Soc. for EQ Engrg. Upper Hutt, New Zealand. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/0312.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  8. 8.

    Thevanayagam S, Fiorillo M, Liang J (2000) Effect of non-plastic fines on undrained cyclic strength of silty sands. Soil Dyn Liq. https://doi.org/10.1061/40520(295)6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00210-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sadrekarimi A (2013) Influence of fines content on liquefied strength of silty sands. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 55:108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Karim ME, Alam MJ (2014) Effect of non-plastic silt content on the liquefaction behavior of sand–silt mixture. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 65:142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hsiao DH, Phan TAV (2014) Effects of silt contents on the static and dynamic properties of sand-silt mixtures. Geomech Eng 7:297–316. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2014.7.3.297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Muley P, Maheshwari BK, Paul DK (2012) Effect of fines on liquefaction resistance of Solani sand. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference earthquake engineering (Lisbon, Port. Pap. No. 1484, 2012). https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/WCEE2012_1484.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  14. 14.

    Karim ME, Alam MJ (2017) Effect of nonplastic silt content on undrained shear strength of sand–silt mixtures. Int J Geoeng 8:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0051-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nilay N, Chakrabortty P (2021) Evolution in liquefaction strength of Ganga river sand due to intrusion of non-plastic silt. In: Latha Gali M, Raghuveer Rao P (eds) Geohazards. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 86. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6233-4_19

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang NY, Yeh ST, Kaufman LP (1982) Liquefaction potential of clean and silty sands. In: Proceedings of third international earthquake microzonation conference, Seattle, USA, vol 2, pp 1017–1032

  17. 17.

    Singh S (1996) Liquefaction characteristics of silts. Geotech Geol Eng 14:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00431231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Amini F, Qi GZ (2000) Liquefaction testing of stratified silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:208–217. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:3(208)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Polito CP, Martin JR II (2001) Effects of nonplastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenvironm Eng 127:408–415. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:5(408)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hazirbaba K (2005) Pore pressure generation characteristics of sands and silty sands: a strain approach. The University of Texas, Austin. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/1791. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  21. 21.

    Dash HK, Sitharam TG (2009) Undrained cyclic pore pressure response of sand–silt mixtures: effect of nonplastic fines and other parameters. Geotech Geol Eng 27:501–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9252-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Belkhatir M, Arab A, Della N, Missoum H, Schanz T (2010) Influence of inter-granular void ratio on monotonic and cyclic undrained shear response of sandy soils. Comptes Rendus Mec 338:290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2010.04.002

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Monkul MM, Yamamuro JA (2011) Influence of silt size and content on liquefaction behavior of sands. Can Geotech J 48:931–942. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dobry R, Pierce WG, Dyvik R, Thomas GE, Ladd RS (1985) Pore pressure model for cyclic straining of sand. Rensselaer Polytech Institute, Troy

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mei X, Olson SM, Hashash YMA (2018) Empirical porewater pressure generation model parameters in 1-D seismic site response analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chakrabortty P, Roshan AR, Das A (2020) Evaluation of dynamic properties of partially saturated sands using cyclic triaxial tests. Indian Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-020-00433-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nilay N (2018) Seismic response of fine saturated sand due to silt intrusion. Indian Institute of Technology Patna

  28. 28.

    IS 2720 (Part 4) (1983) Grain size analysis, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India. https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2720.4.1985. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  29. 29.

    IS 2720 (Part 3) (1980) Determination of specific gravity of soil, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India, (Reaffirmed 2002). https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2720.3.2.1980/page/n4. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  30. 30.

    Lade PV, Liggio CD, Yamamuro JA (1998) Effects of non-plastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand. Geotech Test J 21:336–347. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11373J

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    IS 2720 (Part 8) (1983) Methods of test for soils: Determination of water content-dry density relation using heavy compaction, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India, (Reaffirmed 2002). https://archive.org/details/gov.in.is.2720.8.1983. Accessed 12th Sept 2020

  32. 32.

    ASTM D4254-16 (2016) Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4254-16

  33. 33.

    IS 2720 (Part 5) (1985) Determination of liquid and plastic limit, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhawan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi, India, (Reaffirmed 2002). https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.2720.5.1985.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  34. 34.

    ASTM D5311-13 (2013) Standard test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5311_D5311M-13

  35. 35.

    Kuerbis R, Vaid YP (1988) Sand sample preparation-the slurry deposition method. Soils Found 28:107–118. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.4_107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ishihara K (1993) Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Geotechnique 43:351–451. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Aziz M, Towhata I, Irfan M (2016) Strength and deformation characteristics of degradable granular soils. Geotech Test J 39:452–461. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sitharam TG, GovindaRaju L, Srinivasa Murthy BR (2004) Evaluation of liquefaction potential and dynamic properties of silty sand using cyclic triaxial testing. Geotech Test J 27:423–429. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Vucetic M, Dobry R (1988) Cyclic triaxial strain-controlled testing of liquefiable sands. Adv. triaxial Test. soil rock, ASTM International. https://doi.org/978-0-8031-5048-5

  40. 40.

    Dobry R, Ladd RS, Yokel FY, Chung RM, Powell D (1982) Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method, vol 138. National Bureau of Standards Gaithersburg. https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/article/PB83-111617/XAB. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  41. 41.

    Dyvik R, Dobry R, Thomas GE, Pierce WG (1984) Influence of consolidation shear stresses and relative density on threshold strain and pore pressure during cyclic straining of saturated sand. Rensselaer Polytech Institute, Troy, New York. https://erdc-library.erdc.dren.mil/jspui/handle/11681/10255. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  42. 42.

    Vucetic M (1986) Pore pressure buildup and liquefaction at level sandy sites during earthquakes. Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

  43. 43.

    Jiaer WU, Kammerer AM, Riemer MF, Seed RB, Pestana JM (2004) Laboratory study of liquefaction triggering criteria. In: 13th World conference earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_2580.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2020

  44. 44.

    Das A, Chakrabortty P (2020) Influence of motion energy and soil characteristics on seismic ground response of layered soil. Int J Civ Eng 18:763–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00496-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Thevanayagam S (1998) Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124:479–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:6(479)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hazirbaba K, Rathje EM (2009) Pore pressure generation of silty sands due to induced cyclic shear strains. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Erten D, Maher MH (1995) Cyclic undrained behavior of silty sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(2):115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-7261(94)00035-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The author(s) greatly acknowledge to IIT Patna and Department of Higher Education (Govt. of India) for providing the funding for present research work to carry out the doctoral research study of third author for which no specific Grant number has been allotted.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradipta Chakrabortty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakrabortty, P., Nilay, N. & Das, A. Effect of Silt Content on Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine Saturated River Bed Sands. Int J Civ Eng (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00574-9

Download citation


  • Liquefaction
  • Fine sand
  • Non-plastic silt
  • Strain-controlled test
  • Cyclic triaxial