Skip to main content

Progressive Damage Analyses of Masonry Buildings by Dynamic Analyses

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of prescribed damage on the walls of masonry buildings by experimental and numerical methods. Ambient vibration survey method was applied to an existing, two-story, unreinforced masonry building to determine its dynamic characteristics, such as mode shapes and natural frequencies. Then, the walls on two exterior sides of the building were demolished, and dynamic testing was repeated for the damaged building. As the next step, the amount of damage on the building was increased by more impacts, and the dynamic characteristics of the heavily damaged building were identified. The results obtained from the undamaged, damaged and heavily damaged building were compared, and the damage effect on the natural frequencies of the building was noted. Besides, finite element analyses of the undamaged, damaged and heavily damaged buildings were performed. It was found that, the numerical models, constructed with code-based material properties, do not sufficiently represent the dynamic behavior of masonry buildings. Secondly, as the result of the sustained damage, while the experimental and the numerical modal analyses revealed the decrease in the dominant frequencies of the building, the difference between them increases with the severity of the damage. With the framework presented in this study, the behavior of masonry buildings can better be determined and used for analysis purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. 1.

    Karantoni FV, Fardis MN (1992) Computed versus observed seismic response and damage of masonry buildings. J Struct Eng 118(7):1804–1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bayraktar A, Coşkun N, Yalcın A (2007) Damages of masonry buildings during the July 2, 2004 Doğubayazıt (Ağrı) earthquake in Turkey. Eng Fail Anal 14(1):147–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sayın E, Yön B, Calayır Y, Karaton M (2013) Failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the June 23, 2011 Maden-(Elazığ) earthquake in Turkey. Eng Fail Anal 34:779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gautam D, Chaulagain H (2016) Structural performance and associated lessons to be learned from world earthquakes in Nepal after 25 April 2015 (MW 7.8) Gorkha earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 68:222–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Aras F, Düzci E (2018) Seismic performance of traditional stone masonry dwellings under Çanakkale seismic sequences. J Perform Constr Fac 32(4):04018029-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sherafati MA, Sohrabi MR (2016) Performance of masonry walls during Kaki, Iran, earthquake of April 9, 2013. J Perform Constr Facil 30(3):04015040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tomazevic M (1999) Earthquake resistant design of masonry buildings. Series on Innovations in Structures and Construction, vol 1. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Erberik MA, Citiloglu C, Erkoseoglu G (2019) Seismic performance assessment of confined masonry construction at component and structure levels. Bull Earthq Eng 17:867–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bovo M, Barbaresi A, Torreggiani D, Tassinari P (2019) Collapse and damage to vernacular buildings induced by 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00737-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Portioli F, Mammana O, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM, Krstevska L, Tashkov L, Gramatikov K (2011) Seismic retrofitting of Mustafa Pasha Mosque in Skopje: finite element analysis. J Earthq Eng 15(4):620–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Soulis VJ, Manos GC (2019) Numerical simulation and failure analysis of St. Konstantinos Church, after the Kozani earthquake. Int J Civ Eng 17:949–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sandoval C, Valledor R, Lopez-Garcia D (2017) Numerical assessment of accumulated seismic damage in a historic masonry building. A case study. Int J Archit Herit 11(8):1177–1194

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Aras F, Altay G (2015) Seismic evaluation and structural control of the historical Beylerbeyi Palace. Struct Control Health Monit 22:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li Z, Chen L, Fang Q, Hao H, Zhang Y, Chen W, Xiang H, Bao Q (2017) Study of autoclaved aerated concrete masonry walls under vented gas explosions. Eng Struct 141:444–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li Z, Chen L, Fang Q, Hao H, Zhang Y, Xiang H, Chen W, Yang S, Bao Q (2017) Experimental and numerical study of unreinforced clay brick masonry walls subjected to vented gas explosions. Int J Impact Eng 104:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li Z, Chen L, Fang Q, Chen W, Hao H, Zhang Y (2017) Experimental and numerical study of basalt fiber reinforced polymer strip strengthened autoclaved aerated concrete masonry walls under vented gas explosions. Eng Struct 152:901–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shi Y, Xiong W, Li ZX, Xu Q (2016) Experimental studies on the local damage and fragments of unreinforced masonry walls under close-in explosions. Int J Impact Eng 90:122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bayraktar A, Altunışık AC, Türker T (2016) Structural condition assessment of Birecik Highway Bridge using operational modal analysis. Int J Civ Eng 14:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Aras F (2018) Laboratory tests and vibration surveys for the mechanical properties of infill walls. J Perform Constr Facil 32(1):04017117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Erkal A (2017) Transmission of traffic-induced vibrations on and around the Minaret of Little Hagia Sophia. Int J Archit Herit 11(3):349–362

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hadianfard MA, Rabiee R, Sarshad A (2017) Assessment of vulnerability and dynamic characteristics of a historical building using microtremor measurements. Int J Civ Eng 15:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hashim H, Ibrahim Z, Aabdul Razak H (2017) Dynamic characteristics and model updating of damaged slab from ambient vibration measurements. Measurement 46:1371–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vidal F, Navarro M, Aranda C, Enomoto T (2014) Changes in dynamic characteristics of Lorca RC buildings from pre- and post-earthquake ambient vibration data. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2095–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bassoli E, Forghieri M, Vincenzi L, Bovo M, Mazzotti C (2017) Structural health monitoring of a historical masonry bell tower using operational modal analysis. Key Eng Mater 747:440–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bassoli E, Vincenzi L, Bovo M, Mazzotti C. (2015) Dynamic identification of an ancient masonry bell tower using a MEMS-based acquisition system. In: IEEE workshop on environmental, energy, and structural monitoring systems, proceedings, art. n. 7175882, pp 226–231

  26. 26.

    Ramos LF, Lourenço BB, De Roeck G, Campos-Costa A (2008) Damage identification in masonry structures with vibration measurements. In: D’Ayala D, Fodde E (eds) Structural analysis of historic construction. Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN 978-0-415-46872-5

  27. 27.

    Michel C, Karbassib A, Lestuzzi P (2018) Evaluation of the seismic retrofitting of an unreinforced masonry building using numerical modeling and ambient vibration measurements. Eng Struct 158:124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Turkish Earthquake Code (2007) Specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ministry of PublicWorks and Housing, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Brincker R, Ventura C, Andersen P (2003) Why output-only modal testing is a desirable tool for a wide range of practical applications. In: 21st international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Kissimmee

  30. 30.

    Min ZH, Sun LM (2013) Wavelet-based structural modal parameter identification. Struct Control Health Monit 20:121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Peeters B, De Roeck G (2001) Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: a review. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 123:659–667. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    MATLAB [Computer software] (2012). MathWorks, Inc., Natick

  33. 33.

    Anthoine A (1995) Derivation of the in-plane elastic characteristics of masonry through homogenization theory. J Solid Struct 32(2):137–163

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pietruszcak S, Niu X (1992) A mathematical description of macroscopic behaviour of brick masonry. J Solid Struct 29:531–546

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lopez J, Oller S, Onate E, Lubliner J (1999) A homogeneous constitutive model for masonry. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:1651–1671

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    SAP2000 [Computer software] (2016) Computers and Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek

  37. 37.

    Cobanoglu AB (2016) Investigation of material properties for the Turkish Masonry Buildings. M.Sc. Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12617799/index.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2019

  38. 38.

    Aldemir A, Binici B, Canbay E, Yakut A (2017) Lateral load testing of an existing two story masonry building up to near collapse. Bull Earthq Eng 15:3365–3383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Aldemir A, Binici B, Canbay E, Yakut A (2018) In situ lateral load testing of a two-story solid clay brick masonry building. J Perform Constr Facil 32(5):04018058

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Research Grant No. 116M254.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuat Aras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aras, F., Akbaş, T., Ekşi, H. et al. Progressive Damage Analyses of Masonry Buildings by Dynamic Analyses. Int J Civ Eng 18, 903–917 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00508-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Vibration survey
  • Masonry
  • Full-scale test
  • Numerical model
  • Identification