Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Helical Surface Area on the Performance of a Multi-Helix Anchor

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anchoring temporary shelters is a repetitive and time-consuming task mostly accomplished by hand or handheld tools. Therefore, such anchors should be lightweight and easy to install. Experimental investigations on the effect of anchor geometry on ease of installation and uplift capacity of a double-helix anchor are presented. The double-helix anchor with 1.78 kN uplift capacity was tested on various soil types and conditions. Similar tests were carried out using the same anchors except that the helices were perforated for the first test and notched for the second test. The experimental setup was arranged to allow measurement of installation torque, installation time, and pullout load. It was observed that the uplift capacity and weight of the anchor dropped with the reduction in the surface area of the helices. The drop in the uplift capacities of the anchor with perforated helices and that with perforated and notched helices were 1.05 kN and 1.2 kN, respectively. Weight loss of 0.45 kg due to perforation and 0.88 kg due to notching were recorded. The minimum uplift capacity of the anchor with both perforated and notched helix was 1.84 kN. The ease of installation of the anchors was assessed based on the anchor driving torque and installation time. A general trend of reduction in the magnitude of anchor driving torque and installation time with the reduction in helix surface area was observed. Thus, perforating and notching helix surfaces could reduce the anchor weight and improve drivability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cerato AB, Victor R (2009) Effects of long-term dynamic loading and fluctuating water table on helical anchor performance for small wind tower foundations. J Perform Constr Facil 23(4):251–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyt RM, Clemence SP (1989) Uplift capacity of helical anchors in soil. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2:1019–1022

  3. Engineering Design Manual (2014) Helical Anchors Inc., EDM Rev 02, 1–55 http://www.helicalanchorsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Helical-Anchor-Inc-Engineering-Manual-Rev-02.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2019

  4. Tang C, Phoon KK (2016) Model uncertainty of cylindrical shear method for calculating the uplift capacity of helical anchors in clay. Eng Geol 207:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vesic AS (1971) Breakout Resistance of Objects Embedded in Ocean Bottom. ASCE J Soil Mech Found Div 97(9):1183–1205

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyerhof GG (1973) Uplift resistance of inclined anchors and piles. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands 2 (1):167–172.

  7. Das BM (1978) Model tests for uplift capacity of foundations in clay. Soils Found 18(2):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das BM (1980) A procedure for estimation of ultimate uplift capacity of foundations in clay. Soils Found 20(1):77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang D, Merifield RS, Gaudin C (2013) Uplift behaviour of helical anchors in clay. Can Geotech J 50(6):575–584. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutenegger AJ (2009) Cylindrical shear or plate bearing? Uplift behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in clay. ASCE 185:456–463 Geotechnical Special Publications

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsch MP, Clemence SP (1985) Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Sand. ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mooney JS, Adamczak SJ, Clemence SP (1985) Uplift capacity of helix anchors in clay and silt. In: Proceedings of Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil, ASCE 48–72.

  13. Rao SN, Prasad YVSN, Shetty MD (1991) The behavior of model screw piles in cohesive soils. Soils Found 31(2):35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghaly A, Hanna A, Hanna M (1991) Uplift behavior of screw anchors in sand. I: dry sand. J Geotech Eng 117(5):733–793

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schiavon JA, Tsuha CHC, Thorel L (2017) Cyclic and post-cyclic monotonic response of a single-helix anchor in sand. Geotech Lett 7(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Newgard JT, Schneider J, Thompson DJ (2015) Cyclic response of shallow helical anchors in a medium dense sand. In: Meyer (ed) Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 913–918. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18442-131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lutenegger AJ, Smith BL, Kabir MG (1988) Use of in situ tests to predict performance of multihelix anchors. In: ASCE Proceedings Special Topics in Foundations, Nashville

  18. Narasimha Rao S, Prasad YVSN, Veeresh C (1993) Behavior of embedded model screw anchors in soft clays. Geotechnique 43(4):605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Merifield RS (2011) Ultimate uplift capacity of multiplate helical type anchors in clay. J Geotech Geoenvironm Eng 137(7):704–716. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Gt.1943-5606.0000478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Demir A, Ok B (2015) Uplift response of multi-plate helical anchors in cohesive soil. Geomechan Eng 8(4):615–630. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.4.615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murray EJ, Geddes JD (1987) Uplift of anchor plates in sand. J Geotech Eng ASCE 113(3):202–215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)0733-9410(1987)113:3(202)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ilamparuthi K, Muthukrishnaiah K (1999) Anchors in sand bed: delineation of rupture surface. Ocean Eng 26(12):1249–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(98)00034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Healy KA (1971) Pullout resistance of anchors buried in sands. J Soil Mechan Found Div ASCE 97(11):1615–1622

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ranjan G, Kaushal YP (1977) Load-deformation characteristics of model anchors under horizontal pull in sand. Goetechn Eng Bangk Thail 8:65–78

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hanna AM, Ranjan G (1992) Pullout-displacement of shallow vertical anchor plates. Indian Geotech J 22(1):55–62

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hanna A, Ayadat T, Sabry M (2007) Pullout resistance of single vertical shallow helical and plate anchors in sand. Geotechn Geol Eng 25(5):559–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-007-9129-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghosh P, Samal S (2017) Interaction effect of group of helical anchors in cohesive soil using finite element analysis. Geotechn Geol Eng 35(4):1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0188-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buhler RT, Cerato AB (2010) Design of dynamically wind-loaded helical piers for small wind turbines. J Perform Constr Facil 4:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao SN, Prasad YVSN (1993) Estimation of uplift capacity of helical anchors in clays. J Geotech Eng ASCE 119(2):352–357. https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)0733-9410(1993)119:2(352)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aouadi F, Ghebrab TT, Soroushian P (2018) Reliable and convenient multi-helix soil anchor for deployable structures. Geotechn Geol Eng 36:2611–2623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures (2010) ASCE 7-10, Americal Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Ch26

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the U.S. Army for support of this project under Contract No. DAAD-16–03-C-0027 and DAAD-16–02-C-0027. The authors are also thankful to Ghalam Sarwar for his contribution to the experimental work performed in the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NTH Consultants, Northville, MI, USA

    Fadhel Aouadi

  2. Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, USA

    Tewodros Ghebrab

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA

    Parviz Soroushian

  4. Department of Civil Engineering, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE

    Roz-Ud-Din Nassar

Authors
  1. Fadhel Aouadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tewodros Ghebrab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Parviz Soroushian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roz-Ud-Din Nassar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tewodros Ghebrab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aouadi, F., Ghebrab, T., Soroushian, P. et al. Effect of Helical Surface Area on the Performance of a Multi-Helix Anchor. Int J Civ Eng 18, 439–448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00490-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00490-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation