Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical framework for developing a risk–cost optimised maintenance strategy for structures during their whole service life. A time-dependent reliability method is employed to determine the probability of structural failure and a generic form of stochastic model is developed for structural responses. To facilitate practical application of the proposed framework, a general algorithm is developed and programmed in a user-friendly manner. The merit of the proposed framework is that, in predicting when, where and what maintenance is required for the structure, all structural components and multi-failure modes are considered. It is found in the paper that, to ensure the safe and serviceable operation of the structure as a whole, some components need maintenance multiple times for different failure modes, whilst other components need “do nothing”. It is also found that ignorance of correlation amongst structural components and failure modes would underestimate the risk of structural failures in longer term and that the components with higher cost of structural failures require more maintenance actions. The paper concludes that the proposed framework can equip structural engineers, operators and asset managers with a tool for developing a risk–cost optimal maintenance strategy for structures under their management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hao S (2009) I-35W bridge collapse. J Bridge Eng 15(5):608–614
Yang W, Baji H, Li CQ (2018) Time-dependent reliability method for service life prediction of reinforced concrete shield metro tunnels. Struct Infrastruct Eng 14(8):1095–1107
Piratla KR, Yerri SR, Yazdekhasti S et al (2015) Empirical analysis of water-main failure consequences. Proced Eng 118:727–734
Richards J (1998) Inspection, maintenance and repair of tunnels: international lessons and practice. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 13(4):369–375
U.S. Department of Transportation (2016) Bridge replacement unit costs 2012. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/sd2012.cfm
Whitmore DW, Ball JC (2004) Corrosion management. ACI Concr Int 26(12):82–85
Russell HA, Gilmore J (1997) Inspection policy and procedures for rail transit tunnels and underground structures. Transport Res Board 1:104
Mori Y, Ellingwood BR (1994) Maintaining reliability of concrete structures. II: optimum inspection/repair. J Struct Eng 120(3):846–862
Thoft-Christensen P, Sorensen JD (1987) Optimal strategy for inspection and repair of structural systems. Civ Eng Syst 4(2):94–100
Zhang S, Zhou W (2014) Cost-based optimal maintenance decisions for corroding natural gas pipelines based on stochastic degradation models. Eng Struct 74:74–85
Luque J, Straub D (2019) Risk-based optimal inspection strategies for structural systems using dynamic Bayesian networks. Struct Saf 76:68–80
Faber MH, Straub D, Maes MA (2006) A computational framework for risk assessment of RC structures using indicators. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 21(3):216–230
Stewart MG, Rosowsky DV, Val DV (2001) Reliability-based bridge assessment using risk-ranking decision analysis. Struct Saf 23(4):397–405
Kim S, Frangopol DM (2018) Multi-objective probabilistic optimum monitoring planning considering fatigue damage detection, maintenance, reliability, service life and cost. Struct Multidiscip Optim 57(1):39–54
Barone G, Frangopol DM (2014) Life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating structures by multi-objective optimization involving reliability, risk, availability, hazard and cost. Struct Saf 48:40–50
Sánchez-Silva M, Frangopol DM, Padgett J et al (2016) Maintenance and operation of infrastructure systems: review. J Struct Eng 142(9):F4016004
Barone G, Frangopol DM (2013) Hazard-based optimum lifetime inspection and repair planning for deteriorating structures. J Struct Eng 139(12):04013017
Sommer AM, Nowak AS, Thoft-Christensen P (1993) Probability-based bridge inspection strategy. J Struct Eng 119(12):3520–3536
Moan T (2005) Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures. Struct Infrastruct Eng 1(1):33–62
Stewart M, Estes A, Frangopol DM (2004) Bridge deck replacement for minimum expected cost under multiple reliability constraints. J Struct Eng 130(9):1414–1419
Val DV, Stewart MG (2003) Life-cycle cost analysis of reinforced concrete structures in marine environments. Struct Saf 25(4):343–362
Weyers RE (1998) Service life model for concrete structures in chloride laden environments. ACI Mater J 95(4):445–453
Akgül F, Frangopol DM (2005) Lifetime performance analysis of existing reinforced concrete bridges. II: application. J Infrastruct Syst 11(2):129–141
Barone G, Frangopol DM, Soliman M (2013) Optimization of life-cycle maintenance of deteriorating bridges with respect to expected annual system failure rate and expected cumulative cost. J Struct Eng 140(2):1–13
Estes AC, Frangopol DM (1999) Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach. J Struct Eng 125(7):766–775
Li CQ, Ian Mackie R, Lawanwisut W (2007) A risk-cost optimized maintenance strategy for corrosion-affected concrete structures. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 22(5):335–346
Melchers RE (1999) Structural reliability analysis and prediction. Wiley, New York
Thoft-Cristensen P, Baker MJ (1982) Structural reliability theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin
Jardine AK, Tsang AH (2013) Maintenance, replacement, and reliability: theory and applications. Taylor & Francis Inc, Bosa Roca
Sánchez-Silva M, Klutke GA (2016) Reliability and life-cycle analysis of deteriorating systems. Springer, Switzerland
Li CQ, Firouzi A, Yang W (2016) Closed-form solution to first passage probability for nonstationary lognormal processes. J Eng Mech 142(12):04016103
Firouzi A, Yang W, Li CQ (2018) Efficient solution for calculation of upcrossing rate of nonstationary gaussian process. J Eng Mech 144(4):04018015
Li CQ, Melchers R (1993) Outcrossings from convex polyhedrons for nonstationary Gaussian processes. J Eng Mech 119(11):2354–2361
Papoulis A, Pillai SU (2002) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York
Li CQ, Melchers RE (2005) Time-dependent risk assessment of structural deterioration caused by reinforcement corrosion. ACI Struct J 102(5):754–762
Li CQ, Yang Y, Melchers RE (2008) Prediction of reinforcement corrosion in concrete and its effects on concrete cracking and strength reduction. ACI Mat J 105(1):3–10
Li CQ, Melchers RE, Zheng JJ (2006) Analytical model for corrosion-induced crack width in reinforced concrete structures. ACI Struct J 103(4):479–487
Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New York
MATLAB (2017) Global optimization toolbox user’s guide. Mathworks, Natick
JCSS, Probabilistic model code (2019) Technical University of Denmark. http://www.jcss.ethz.ch
Bournonville M, Dahnke J, Darwin D (2004) Statistical analysis of the mechanical properties and weight of reinforcing bars. University of Kansas, Lawrence, p 194
Mirza SA, MacGregor JG (1979) Variability of mechanical properties of reinforcing bars. J Struct Div 105(5):921–937
Vu KA, Stewart MG (2005) Predicting the likelihood and extent of reinforced concrete corrosion-induced cracking. J Struct Eng 131(11):1681–1689
Vu KA (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills
Higgins C, Farrow WC, Turan OT (2012) Analysis of reinforced concrete beams with corrosion damaged stirrups for shear capacity. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(11):1080–1092
Acknowledgements
The financial support from the Australian Research Council under DP140101547, LP150100413 and DP17010224, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China with Grant no. 51820105014 are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
According to the theory of stochastic processes (Papoulis and Pillai 2002), all variables in Eq. (9) can be determined, for a given Gaussian stochastic process with mean function μS(t), and auto-covariance function \(C_{SS} (t_{i} ,t_{j} )\), as follows:
where
and the cross-covariance function is
Based on the above relationships, all the variables in Eq. (9) can be determined.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, W., Baji, H. & Li, CQ. A Theoretical Framework for Risk–Cost-Optimized Maintenance Strategy for Structures. Int J Civ Eng 18, 261–278 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00470-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00470-x