Skip to main content
Log in

A Field Investigation on the Effects of Using USPs in Transition Zone From Ballasted Track to Bridges

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transition zone is one of the vulnerable sections in railway tracks. This study was conducted to assess the effects of using under sleeper pads (USPs) in the transition zone from ordinary ballasted track to railway bridges. For this purpose, a railway bridge with two spans (with the length of 7 m) and an overall length of 15.5 m was selected, followed by designing and conducting field tests in three states: (1) without USP, (2) with USP only on bridge section, and (3) with USP on bridge section and transition zone. The vibrational behavior of the bridge and track components was monitored during train passage by the installation of accelerometers on the bridge, rail, sleeper, and installation of linear variable displacement transducer beneath the bridge deck. The results showed that the maximum effects of using USPs in the transition zone were in the first span so that the average value of accelerations in all speeds decreased in the first span. The acceleration of the rails in the third experiment was 4% lower than the second one and 35% lower than the first one. This reduction for sleepers was 9% and 24%, respectively, and for the bridge deck, it was 48% and 66%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Varandas JN, Hölscher P, Silva MAG (2016) Three-dimensional track-ballast interaction model for the study of a culvert transition. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 89:116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Real J, Zamorano C, Real T, Morales S (2016) New transition wedge design composed by prefabricated reinforced concrete slabs. Lat Am J Solids Struct 13:1431–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paixão A, Fortunato E, Calçada R (2014) Transition zones to railway bridges: track measurements and numerical modelling. Eng Struct 80:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zakeri JA, Esmaeili M, Heydari-Noghabi H (2016) A field investigation into the effect of under sleeper pads on the reduction of railway-induced ground-borne vibrations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 230(3):999–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lakušik S, Ahac M, Haladin I (2010) Experimental investigation of railway track with under sleeper pad. In: Slovenian congress on road and traffic, Portorož, pp 386–393

  6. Witt S (2008) The influence of under sleeper pads on railway track dynamics. Dissertation, Linkopnig University, Sweden

  7. Kaewunruen S, Aikawa A, Remennikov AM (2017) Vibration attenuation at rail joints through under sleeper pads. Procedia Eng 189:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider P, Bolmsvik R, Nielsen JCO (2011) In situ performance of a ballasted railway track with under sleeper pads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 225(3):299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mottahed J, Zakeri JA, Mohammadzadeh S (2018) Field and numerical investigation into the effect of under sleeper pads on dynamic behavior of railway bridges. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 232(8):2126–2137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andrade AR, Teixeira PF (2018) Assessing temporary speed restrictions and associated unavailability costs in railway infrastructure. Int J Civ Eng 16(2):219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Insa R, Salvador P, Inarejos J, Roda A (2011) Analysis of the influence of under sleeper pads on the railway vehicle/track dynamic interaction in transition zones. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 226(4):409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan Y, Albers B, Savidis SA (2013) Influence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track–subgrade systems. Comput Geotech 48(1):21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giannakos K, Tsoukantas S (2012) Transition zone between ballastless and ballasted track: influence of changing stiffness on acting force. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:3548–3557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heydari-Noghabi H, Varandas JN, Esmaeili M, Zakeri J (2017) Investigating the influence of auxiliary rails on dynamic behavior of railway transition zone by a 3D train-track interaction mode. Lat Am J Solids Struct 14(11):2000–2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heydari-Noghabi H, Zakeri J, Esmaeili M, Varandas JN (2018) Field study using additional rails and an approach slab as a transition zone from slab track to the ballasted track. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 232(4):970–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jabbar Ali Zakeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mottahed, J., Zakeri, J.A. & Mohammadzadeh, S. A Field Investigation on the Effects of Using USPs in Transition Zone From Ballasted Track to Bridges. Int J Civ Eng 17, 1421–1431 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00440-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00440-3

Keywords

Navigation