Fire Structural Response of the Plasco Building: A Preliminary Investigation Report

  • Behrouz BehnamEmail author
Research paper


The fire-induced collapse of the 16-story Plasco building in Tehran city in January 2017 caused many deaths and serious injuries. This paper investigates the structural response of the building during that fire to understand how the building became unstable. As documented, the fire initiated on the tenth floor, and then involved stories 11–14 through a vertically traveling fire. As the occupancy type of the building had changed over time, the analysis was performed based on an estimated fire load density of 1900 MJ/m2 on the day of the catastrophe. The results showed that the structure was able to resist the applied loads when the fire remained within stories 10 and 11. When the fire involved stories 10–14, however, the structure began to fail, starting with the failure of the ceiling trusses. The results also indicated that as the columns were protected by a layer of masonry, they were able to tolerate their applied loads. The analysis was also re-performed based on a fire load density of 511 MJ/m2, which is the fire load recommended by most fire codes for a similar occupancy type. The results showed that no structural failure would have occurred under that fire load. This study indicates that changing the occupancy type of a building without adopting proper mitigation strategies can be catastrophic.


Plasco building Structural fire Thermal analysis Fire load Structural collapse 



The investigation performed here was supported by the Tehran Fire Safety Department (TFSD). The author also gratefully acknowledges Mr. Mahmoud Ghadiri, Mr. Hadi Valehi, Ms. Saber Fatourechian, Ms. Fahimeh Shojaei and Mr. Shahram Shafaghati for their help in collecting the required data for the building analysis. Without their help, it would not have been possible to complete the work here.


  1. 1.
    Newman G (1991) Structural fire engineering investigation of Broadgate phase 8 fire. Steel Construction Industry Forum, AscotGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Simon M (2017) Why broadgate phase 8 composite floor did not fail under fire: numerical investigation using ANSYS® FEA code. J Struct Fire Eng 8:238–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bažant ZP, Zhou Y (2002) Why did the world trade center collapse?—simple analysis. J Eng Mech 128:2–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quintiere JG, di Marzo M, Becker R (2002) A suggested cause of the fire-induced collapse of the World Trade Towers. Fire Saf J 37:707–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Usmani AS, Chung YC, Torero JL (2003) How did the WTC towers collapse: a new theory. Fire Saf J 38:501–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cowlard A, Bittern A, Abecassis-Empis C, Torero J (2013) Fire safety design for tall buildings. Proc Eng 62:169–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sabelli R, Mahin S, Chang C (2003) Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces. Eng Struct 25:655–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taranath BS (2016) Structural analysis and design of tall buildings: steel and composite construction: CRC press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Plasco building (1977) Tehran municipality, TehranGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eurocode 1, Part 1–2, BS EN 1991-1-2 (1991) General actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. CEN, Brussels (European Standard EN 1991-1-2)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGrattan K, Klein B, Hostikka S, Floyd J (2010) Fire dynamics simulator (version 5), user’s guide. NIST Spec Publ 1019:1–186Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shakib H, Pirizadeh M, Dardaei S, Zakersalehi M (2018) Technical and administrative assessment of Plasco building incident. Int J Civil Eng CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Behnam B (2016) On the effect of traveling fire on the stability of seismic-damaged large reinforced concrete structures. Int J Civil Eng 14:535–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drysdale D (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franssen J-M (2005) SAFIR: a thermal/structural program for modeling structures under fire. Eng J 42:143–50Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    EN1994 BS (2005) 1–2. Eurocode 4. Design of composite steel and concrete structures. Part 1. 2. General rules. Structural fire design. European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Denoël JF (2007) Fire safety and concrete structures. Federation of Belgian Cement Industry, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chung KF (2006) Fire resistance design of composite slabs in building structures: from research to practice. Struct Eng 84:30–36Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodrigues JC, Neves IC, Valente J (2000) Experimental research on the critical temperature of compressed steel elements with restrained thermal elongation. Fire Saf J 35:77–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gernay T, Franssen JM (2012) A formulation of the Eurocode 2 concrete model at elevated temperature that includes an explicit term for transient creep. Fire Saf J 51:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neves IC, Rodrigues JPC, Loureiro AdP (1996) Mechanical properties of reinforcing and prestressing steels after heating. J Mater Civ Eng 8:189–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gernay T, Dimia M (2011) Structural behavior of concrete columns under natural fires including cooling down phase. Proceedings of The International Conference on Recent Advances in Nonlinear Models-Structural Concrete Applications: RAGRAF. 637–56Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li Y-H, Franssen J-M (2011) Test results and model for the residual compressive strength of concrete after a fire. J Struct Fire Eng 2:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beyler C, Beitel J, Iwankiw N, Lattimer B (2007) Fire resistance testing for performance-based fire design of buildings. Final report. The Fire Protection Research Foundation Quincy, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Behnam B, Ronagh HR (2014) Behavior of moment-resisting tall steel structures exposed to a vertically traveling post-earthquake fire. Struct Des Tall Spec Build 23:1083–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roben C (2009) Effect of cooling and non-uniform fires on structural behaviour. The University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kotsovinos P (2013) Analysis of the structural response of tall buildings under multifloor and traveling fires. University of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Usmani A (2005) Stability of the world trade center twin towers structural frame in multiple floor fires. J Eng Mech 131:654–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations