Field Investigation of Maximum Dynamic Shear Modulus of Clay Deposit Using Seismic Piezocone
- 31 Downloads
The maximum dynamic shear modulus (Gmax) of soils is a fundamental parameter used in the evaluation of soil dynamic behavior and seismic design in geotechnical engineering. In this study, seismic piezocone (SCPTU) and resonant column (RCT) test methods were adopted for measuring soil shear wave velocity (Vs) in Jiangsu Province of China. Then, the relationship between the Gmax and SCPTU test parameters was established based on the test data of shear wave velocity. The results show that using the correlation between the cone resistance (qt) and void ratio (e) or pore pressure parameter (Bq) to evaluate Gmax was better than using the single-cone tip resistance parameters. The Gmax of the soft soil can be determined more accurately using the cone tip resistance and pore pressure parameters measured by the SCPTU test method, and corrected based on the laboratory test data. The evaluation of Gmax based on the RCT test results was not satisfactory due to the soil disturbance induced during sampling and testing processes.
KeywordsSeismic piezocone Resonant column Soft clay Maximum dynamic shear modulus
This research was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20161311), Joint Technology Transfer Center of Yancheng Vocational Institute of Industry Technology, Yancheng Polytechnic College (Grant No. YGKF-201705), Six Major Talent Peak in Jiangsu Province in China (Grant No. 2015-JZ-011), and Innovation of Science and Technology of Institution of Higher Education in Jiangsu Province (Grant No. 2017-51). The authors are also grateful to Dr. Xinbao Yu and Dr. Cheng Lu for their constructive comments on this paper.
- 1.Chen GX, Zhu DH, He QZ (2003) Development and property test of GZZ-1 free vibration column test system. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 23(1):111–114. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1301.2003.01.018 Google Scholar
- 2.Tavenas F, Leroueil S (1987) State-of-the-art on laboratory and in-situ stress-strain-time behavior of soft clays. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils. Mexico City, pp 13–14Google Scholar
- 3.Mayne P (2000) Enhanced geotechnical site characterization by seismic piezocone penetration tests. In: Fourth International Geotechnical Conference, Cairo University, pp 95–120Google Scholar
- 9.Hosseini SMM, Hajimohammadi AA, Hajimohammadi AR (2010) The validity assesment of laboratory shear modolus using in-situ seismic piezocone test results. Int J Civil Eng 8(2):134–142Google Scholar
- 10.Abu-Farsakh MY (2007) Possible evaluation of overconsolidation ratio of clayey soils from piezocone penetration tests. Geo-Denver, GSP 162 Problematic Soils and Rocks and In Situ Characterization, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- 12.Demers D (2001) Contribution au développement de l’usage du piézocône dans les sols argileux. Dissertation, Université LavalGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mayne PW, Robertson PK, Lunne T (1998) Clay stress history evaluated from seismic piezocone. Geotech Site Charact 2:1113–1118Google Scholar
- 15.Schmertmann JH (1978) Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test, United States Department of Transportation. Report FHWA TS-78-209Google Scholar
- 19.Hegazy YA, Mayne PW (1995) Statistical correlation between vs and cone penetration data for different soil types. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT'95, Linkoping, Sweden, pp 173–178Google Scholar
- 22.Simonini P, Cola S (2000) Use of piezocone to predict maximum stiffness of Venetian soils. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 126(4):378–382. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:4(378) CrossRefGoogle Scholar