Skip to main content

Discrete Element Modeling of Drained Triaxial Test: Flexible and Rigid Lateral Boundaries

Abstract

In the present paper, drained triaxial test on granular materials is simulated by discrete element method. Two types of boundary conditions including rigid and flexible boundaries are modeled in the tests. To simulate flexible boundary condition, a new algorithm based on linking the MATLAB and PFC3D codes is proposed. In this algorithm, triaxial test samples are simulated in PFCD3D and the spatial coordinates of particles are transferred to MATLAB code. Then, boundary particles are identified by irradiation from centerline of specimen and their identities are transferred back to PFC3D to impose boundary forces. The presented algorithm is relatively simple and there is no need of tessellation at the boundary surface. Besides, employment of MATLAB code improves the efficiency of computations. Imposition of confining pressure via normal forces to the outer surface of boundary and precise identification of boundary particles in large deformation are other advantages of the proposed algorithm. After validation of the proposed algorithm by some experimental tests, a comprehensive survey has been performed on micro- and macro-behavior of samples simulated by rigid and flexible boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  1. 1.

    Cundall PA (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive, large-scale movements in blocky rock systems. Proc Symp Int Soc Rock Mech Nancy 2:8

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    O’Donovan J, O’Sullivan C, Marketos G, Wood DM (2015) Analysis of bender element test interpretation using the discrete element method. Granul Matter 17:197–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li B, Zhang F, Gutierrez M (2015) A numerical examination of the hollow cylindrical torsional shear test using DEM. Acta Geotech 10:449–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kozicki J, Niedostatkiewicz M, Tejchman J, Muhlhaus H-B (2013) Discrete modelling results of a direct shear test for granular materials versus FE results. Granul Matter 15:607–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Laufer I (2015) Grain crushing and high-pressure oedometer tests simulated with the discrete element method. Granul Matter 17:389–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Borhani A, Fakharian K (2016) Effect of particle shape on dilative behavior and stress path characteristics of Chamkhaleh sand in undrained triaxial tests. Int J Civ Eng 14:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xiao J, Yang H, Zhang J, Tang X (2017) Properties of drained shear strength of expansive soil considering low stresses and its influencing factors. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0268-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bayat M, Ghalandarzadeh A (2017) Stiffness degradation and damping ratio of sand-gravel mixtures under saturated state. Int J Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0274-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gu X, Huang M, Qian J (2013) DEM investigation on the evolution of microstructure in granular soils under shearing. Granul Matter 16:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gong G, Thornton C, Chan AHC (2012) DEM simulations of undrained triaxial behavior of granular material. J Eng Mech 138:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Belheine N, Plassiard J-P, Donzé F-V, Darve F, Seridi A (2009) Numerical simulation of drained triaxial test using 3D discrete element modeling. Comput Geotech 36:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kozicki J, Tejcham J, Muhlhau HB (2014) Discrete simulations of a triaxial compression test for sand by DEM. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1923–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Itasca Consulting Group (2005) Particle flow code in three dimension (PFC3D). Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang Y, Tonon F (2009) Modeling triaxial test on intact rock using discrete element method with membrane boundary. J Eng Mech 135:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Cheung G, O’Sullivan C (2008) Effective simulation of flexible lateral boundaries in two- and three-dimensional DEM simulations. Particuology 6:483–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thornton C (2000) Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Geotechnique 50:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kuhn MR (1995) A flexible boundary for three-dimensional dem particle assemblies. Eng Comput 12:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang R, Sture S (1996) Flexible boundary for discrete element simulation of granular assemblies. In: 11th ASCE engineering mechanics conference. ASCE, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, pp 723–726

  19. 19.

    O’Sullivan C, Cui L (2009) Micromechanics of granular material response during load reversals: combined DEM and experimental study. Powder Technol 193:289–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    de Bono J, McDowell G, Wanatowski D (2012) Discrete element modeling of a flexible membrane for triaxial testing of granular material at high pressures. Geotech Lett 2:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cil MB, Alshibli KA (2014) 3D analysis of kinematic behavior of granular materials in triaxial testing using DEM with flexible membrane boundary. Acta Geotech 9:287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Proubet J, Bardet JP (1991) A numerical investigation of the structure of persistent shear bands in granular media. Géotechnique 41:599–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bardet JP, Proubet J (1992) Shear-band analysis in idealized granular material. J Eng Mech 118:397–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thomas PA, Bray JD (1999) Capturing nonspherical shape of granular media with disk clusters. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang Y-H, Leung S-C (2008) A particulate-scale investigation of cemented sand behavior. Can Geotech J 45:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Verdugo R, Ishihara K (1996) The steady state of sandy soils. Soils Found 36:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kolymbas D, Wu W (1990) Recent results of triaxial tests with granular materials. Powder Technol 60:99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mohammad Binesh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binesh, S.M., Eslami-Feizabad, E. & Rahmani, R. Discrete Element Modeling of Drained Triaxial Test: Flexible and Rigid Lateral Boundaries. Int J Civ Eng 16, 1463–1474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0293-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Rigid boundary
  • Flexible boundary
  • Discrete element
  • Triaxial test