Skip to main content
Log in

Finite Element and Experimental Investigation on the Flexural Response of Pre-tensioned T-Girders

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of analytical and numerical approaches exist for modeling concrete structural members. Finite-element analysis (FEA) is a numerical method that is widely applied to concrete structures based on the use of the nonlinear behavior of materials. The challenge of modeling prestressed concrete structures lies in the treatment of the interface between concrete and prestressing tendons. The FEA-modeling technique discussed in this study is based on general-purpose finite-element packages. This study describes FEA of full-scale high-strength self-compacting concrete, HSSCC pre-tensioned T-girders and its comparison with experimental results. Three 9 m length fully pre-tensioned bridge girders, PHSSCC were designed and cast using HSSCC. The girders were instrumented to monitor deflection, pre-tensioned losses, tendon, steel bar, and concrete strains. The girders were then load tested (until failure), predominantly under flexure, and their service and ultimate results including cracking, flexural stiffness, flexural strength, and different ductility indexes were investigated and compared with FEA results. The software package ABAQUS was used to simulate girders and their bonding conditions to verify the accuracy of FEA. A very good agreement was achieved for numerical and experimental crack patterns. The comparison of finite-element modeling (FEM) and experimental results of load-upward and downward deflections indicated satisfactory agreement throughout the load history of the beams until failure. Comparing FEM and experimental results, reasonable agreement was observed for the two methods of ductility indexes. Finite-element modeling tends to overestimate stress in prestressed tendons at the ultimate state of specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ACI Committee 237, “Self-Consolidating Concrete”, ACI 237R-07, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, 2007

  2. Khayat KH, Feys D, “Design, Production and Placement of Self-Consolidating Concrete”, RILEM Bookseries 1, Montreal, 2010

  3. Padmarajaiah SK, Ramaswamy A (2002) A finite element assessment of flexural strength of prestressed concrete beams with fiber reinforcement. Cement Concr Compos 24:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayoub A, Filippou FC (2010) A finite-element model for pre-tensioned prestressed concrete girders. Struct Eng 136(4):401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wehbe N, Stripling C (2013) Experimental assessment of flexural strength and serviceability of prestressed SCC bridge I girders with composite decks. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(3):540–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maghsoudi M, Maghsoudi AA, Heshmati AA (2016) The monitored and theoretical ultimate moment and ductility of pre-tensioned HSSCC bridge girders. Struct Concrete 17(5):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trejo D, Beth HM, Hoon KY (2008) Self-consolidating concrete for precast structural applications, a research project performed in cooperation with the Texas department of transportation and the federal highway administration. Texas Transportation Institute, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. AASHTO (2006) LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 6th edn, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

  9. Khayat KH, Mitchell D (2009) Self-consolidating concrete for precast, prestressed concrete bridge elements”, NCHRP 628 report

  10. Craeye B, Van Itterbeeck P, Desnerck P, Boel V, De Schutter G (2014) Modulus of elasticity and tensile strength of self-compacting concrete: survey of experimental data and structural design codes, 54, pp 53–61

  11. Huang Y, Kang T, Ramseyer C (2010) Background to multi-scale modelling of unbonded post-tensioned concrete structures. Int J Theor Appl Multiscale Mech 1(3):219–235

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Abaqs User’s Manual (2014) Volumes I to III, Hibbitt, Karlson & Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lou T, Kang T, Lopez SMR, Lopez AV (2015) A comparative study of continuous beams prestressed with bonded FRP and steel tendons. Compos Struct 124:100–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercan B, Schultz AE, Stolarski HK (2010) finite element modeling of prestressed concrete spandrel beams. Eng Struct 32:2804–2813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim AM, Mubarak HM (2009) Finite element modeling of continuous reinforced concrete beam external prestressed. Eur J Sci Res 30(1):177–188

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lou TJ, Xiang YQ (2006) Finite element modeling of concrete beams prestressed with external tendons. Eng Struct 28:1919–1926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yapar O, Basu PK, Nordendale N (2015) Accurate finite element modeling of pre-tensioned prestressed concrete beams. Eng Struct 101:163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ACI Committee 318 (2011) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, ACI 318-11, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills

  19. PCI Self-consolidating concrete FAST team (2003) Interim guidelines for the use of self-consolidating concrete in PCI member plants, PCI Committee Summary Report

  20. Lee J, Fenves GL (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Eng Mech 124(8):892–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. CEB-FIP model code (1990) Comite-Euro International du Beton/Federation Internationale de la Precomtrainte, CEB-FIP-90, London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grassl P (2004) Modelling of Dilation of Concrete and Its Effect in Triaxial Compression”. Journal of Finite Element Analysis Design 40:1021–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang Y (2012) Finite Element Method for Post-tensioned Prestressed Concrete Structures”, A dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Oklahoma in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of philosophy in Civil Engineering, Norman, Oklahoma University, USA

  24. Stavroulaki ME, Leftheris BP, Stavroulakis GE (1997) Optimal prestress in modal analysis via induced temperature modeling. Struct Optim 3(2–3):95–103

  25. Chapra SC, Canale RP (1988) ‘‘Numerical Methods for Engineers”, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Naaman AE, Harajli MH, Wight JK (1986) Analysis of ductility in partially prestressed concrete flexural members. PCI J 31(3):64–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Naaman AE, Jeong S (1995) Structural ductility of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons. In: Taerwe L, Spon EFN. Proceeding of The Second International RILEM Symposium, Ghent, Belgium, 379–386

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kerman Province State Highway and Transportation officials for their financial support and Arash Ali Heshmati for assisting in the construction of the specimens. Thanks are also due to the faculty of Civil Engineering at the Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman for providing the laboratory test facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Akbar Maghsoudi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maghsoudi, M., Maghsoudi, A.A. Finite Element and Experimental Investigation on the Flexural Response of Pre-tensioned T-Girders. Int J Civ Eng 17, 541–553 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0290-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0290-3

Keywords

Navigation