Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of the Drag Coefficient on Communication Towers

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the recent wind loading procedures for the design of lattice towers. In particular, the paper focuses the attention on the drag coefficient of communication towers with square and triangular cross-section and with flat-sided and circular elements. It provides some background behind the normative methodology of the current specialized codes and its relationship with results of experimental tests. For this purposes, different load patterns were adopted from the application of the normative methodology of the following countries: Mexico, United States, India, Japan and Australian–New Zealand Code. Additionally, the paper provides examples based on actual communication towers to illustrate the lack of consensus and to identify uncertainties in the procedures. The paper concludes that the complexity of most current wind design procedures is not justified and it pretends to help to make rational decision by designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mara T, Hong H (2013) Effect of wind direction on the response and capacity surface of a transmission tower. Eng Struct 57:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peyrot AH (2009) Wind loading: uncertainties and honesty suggest simplification. In: Proceedings, electrical transmission and substation structures conference, american society of civil engineering, Ohio, US, pp 184–208

  3. Savory E, Parke GAR, Zeinoddini M, Toy N, Disney P (2001) Modeling of tornado and microburst-induced wind loading and failure of a lattice transmission tower. Eng Struct 23:365–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murià D (2015) El huracán Odile y sus efectos en la infraestructura del sur de la península de Baja California. Research report, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, October (in Spanish)

  5. Tapia-Hernández E, Ibarra-Santiago S, De-León-Escobedo D (2016) Collapse mechanisms of power towers under wind loading. Struct Infrastruct Eng. doi:10.1080/15732479.2016.1190765

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mara (2013) Capacity assessment of a transmission tower under wind loading. Thesis and Dissertation Repository, University of Western Ontario, Paper 1527

  7. IS 875–95 (1992) Use of structural steel in over head transmission line towers- code of practice (Materials, loads and permissible stress), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India

  8. AIJ-06 (2006), Recommendations for loads on building. Chapter 6: Wind loads, Architectural Institute of Japan AIJ, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASCE 7–10 (2010), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7–05, American Society of Civil Engineers. ISBN 07844-0809-2

  10. AS/NZS-11 (2011) ASNZS 1170.2. Structural design actions. Part 2: Wind actions. Australian, New Zealand standard

  11. IEC-03 (2003), International Electro-technical Commission (IEC). Design criteria of overhead transmission lines, IEC Standard 60826: 2003, 3rd. Edition

  12. CFE-08 (2008), Manual de Diseño de Obras Civiles, Capitulo de Diseño por Viento, Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas, Comisión Federal de Electricidad, Mexico (in Spanish)

  13. NTCV-04 (2004), Guidelines for Wind Design of the Mexico’s Federal District Code, Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal, Tomo II (in Spanish)

  14. Davenport AG (1961) The application of statistical concepts to the wind loading on structures. Proc Inst Civil Eng 19(4):449–472

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bayar DC (1986) Drag Coefficients of latticed towers. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(2):417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes JD (2007) Wind loading of structures, Second edition. Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Oliveria e SA, Medeiros JC, Loredo-Souza AM, Rocha MM, Rippel I, Carpeggiani EA, Nuñez GJZ (2006) Wind loads on metallic latticed transmission line towers, International Council on Large Electric Systems, Cigre, Paper B2-202. Paris, France

  18. AIJC-06 (2006) Commentary. Recommendations for loads on building. Architectural Institute of Japan AIJ, Tokyo, Japan

  19. Flachsbart O, Winter H (1955) Model research on the wind loading of lattice structures. Translated from German by Tucker BL. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, pp 1–122

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pagon WW (1958) Wind forces on structures: plate girders and trusses. J Struct Eng Div 84:ST4

  21. Carril CF, Isyumov N, Reyolando MLRF (2003) Experimental study of the wind forces on rectangular latticed communication towers with antennas. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 91:1007–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cowdrey CE (1965) Aerodynamic forces and moments on models of two sections of a forth crossing tower. NPL/Aero Special Report 027, June

  23. Travanca R, Varum H, Vila P (2012) The past 20 years of telecommunication structures in Portugal. Eng Struct 48:472–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Savory E, Parke GAR, Disney P, Toy N (2008) Wind-induced transmission tower foundation loads: A field study-design code comparison. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 96:1103–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang F, Yang J, Niu H, Zhang H (2015) Design wind loads for tubular-angle steel cross-arms of transmission towers under skewed wind loading. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 140:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cervantes-Castillo JA (2017) Effect of wind direction on the response of telecommunication towers. Master Thesis, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, Mexico (in Spanish)

  27. CSI (2010) SAP 2000 V14 integrated finite element analysis and design of structures. Computers and Structures, CSI, Berkeley, California, EEUU

  28. MFDC-04 (2004) Mexico’s Federal District Code, Gaceta Oficial del Departamento del Distrito Federal, Tomo II (in Spanish)

  29. Yin T, Lam HF, Chow HM, Zhu HP (2009) Dynamic reduction-based structural damage detection of transmission tower utilizing ambient vibration data. Eng Struct 31:200–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holmes JD (1995) Along-wind response of lattice towers-II. Aerodynamic damping and deflections. Eng Struct 18(7):483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee PS, McClure G (2007) Elastoplastic large deformation analysis of a lattice steel tower structure and comparison with full-scale tests. J Constr Steel Res 63:709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Da Silva JGS, Vellasco PCG, Da S, De Andrade SAL, De Oliveira MIR (2005) Structural assessment of current steel design models for transmission and telecommunication towers. J Constr Steel Res 61:1108–1134

  33. Tapia-Hernández E (2016) Tubular steel poles under lateral load patterns. Adv Steel Constr 12(4):428–445

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng X, Dong J, Han X, Fei Q (2016) Structural health monitoring-finite-element model for a large transmission tower. Int J Civ Eng. doi:10.1007/s40999-016-0069-3

    Google Scholar 

  35. Prasad RN, Knight GMS, Mohan SJ, Lakshmanan N (2012) Studies on failure of transmission line towers in testing. Eng Struct 35:55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The master fellowship granted to the second author by the National Science and Technology Council of Mexico (Conacyt) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Azcapotzalco, México, D.F., Mexico

    Edgar Tapia-Hernández & José A. Cervantes-Castillo

Authors
  1. Edgar Tapia-Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. José A. Cervantes-Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar Tapia-Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tapia-Hernández, E., Cervantes-Castillo, J.A. Influence of the Drag Coefficient on Communication Towers. Int J Civ Eng 16, 499–511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0157-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0157-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation