International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 457–474 | Cite as

The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: Analysis of a Local Structural Consolidation

  • Claudio Alessandri
  • Jessica Turrioni
Research paper


An innovative technique for reinforcing a wall of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem against earthquakes is proposed. The use of such a technique was required due to the peculiarity of the site, recently added to the UNESCO list of World Heritage sites, which is important to both Christian and Islamic religions. Local seismicity data and the parameters of an equivalent Italian site provided the input data for a design earthquake, and 3D modal analysis of the entire Church revealed that the structure is characterized by clear local modes of vibration. As per the most recent studies on masonry structures, local assessment based on limit analysis procedures was performed. This showed that in the event of an earthquake, a Crusade-era wall addition is at risk of collapse via simple overturning around its own base, due to the lack of firm connections with the orthogonal walls of the façade and the transept. Hence, a novel double system of horizontal steel tension structures was designed to consolidate the wall, conforming to the main restoration Charter requirements, i.e. lightness, non-invasiveness and reversibility, and being hidden from the sight of visitors. In the absence of reliable local regulations, all analyses, computations and checks on the proposed intervention were carried out with reference to the Italian technical regulations.


Tension structures Masonry Church of the Nativity Local collapse mechanisms 



Thanks are due to Piacenti S.p.A., the main contractor for the restoration works on the Church of the Nativity, and to all their staff, for providing geometric and materials data. The first Author is also grateful to the Palestinian Presidential Committee for the restoration works on the Church of the Nativity for his appointment as general consultant for the ongoing restoration works, and the opportunity to contribute to the studies on the Church.


  1. 1.
    Alessandri C (2012) Preface. J Cult Herit 13:e1–e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacci M, Bianchi G, Campana S, Fichera G (2012) Historical and archaeological analysis of the Church of the Nativity. J Cult Herit 13:e5–e26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Santopuoli N, Concina E, Sarmati S (2012) The conservation of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and the preliminary restoration project of the decorated surfaces. J Cult Herit 13:e93–e123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Faella G, Frunzio G, Guadagnuolo M, Donadio A, Ferri L (2012) The Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: non-destructive tests for the structural knowledge. J Cult Herit 13:e27–e41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Macchioni N, Brunetti M, Pizzo B, Burato P, Nocetti M, Palanti S (2012) The timber structures in the Church of the Nativity: typologies and diagnosis. J Cult Herit 13:e42–e53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernabei M, Bontadi J (2012) Dendrochronological analysis of the timber structure of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. J Cult Herit 13:e54–e60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palanti S, Pecoraro E, Scarpino F (2012) Wooden doors and windows in the Church of the Nativity: evaluation of biotic and abiotic decay and proposals of interventions. J Cult Herit 13:e82–e92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alessandri C, Mallardo V (2012) Structural assessments of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. J Cult Herit 13:e61–e69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alessandri C, Mallardo V, Pizzo B, Ruocco E (2012) The roof of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem: structural problems and intervention techniques. J Cult Herit 13:e70–e81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mele E, De Luca A, Giordano A (2012) Modelling and analysis of a basilica under earthquake loading. J Cult Herit 4:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papalou A (2016) Examining the dynamic response of classical columns. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0110-6 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthq Spectra 20(2):377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mallardo V, Malvezzi R, Milani E, Milani G (2008) Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings: a case study in Ferrara. Eng Struct (30):2223–2241Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Milani G, Del Grosso A, Alessandri C, Valente M (2015) A nonlinear finite element approach to predict the structural damage of the Narthex of the Bethlehem Nativity Church. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth international conference on Civil-Comp Press, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi HK, Bae BI, Choi CS (2016) Lateral resistance of unreinforced masonry walls strengthened with engineered cementitious composite. Int J Civ Eng 14:411. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0026-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamilton RW (1934) Excavations in the Atrium of the Church of the Nativity. Q Dep Antiq Palest (3):1–8Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harvey W (1938) Recent discoveries at the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem. Archaeologia (87):7–17Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagatti B (1952) Gli antichi edifici sacri di Betlemme, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decreto Ministeriale 14 Gennaio 2008 “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni” e relativi allegati A e B, pubblicato nel Supplemento ordinario della Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 del 4 Febbraio 2008Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici—Circolare 2 febbraio 2009, n. 617—Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici—Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale-allineamento alle nuove Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (23 luglio 2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    (2004) Straus7—finite element analysis system release 2.3.3Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brandonisio G, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A (2013) Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 34:693–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Milani G, Valente M (2015) Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: possibilities of non-linear finite elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms. Eng Fail Anal 47:129–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milani G, Valente M (2015) Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches. Eng Fail Anal 54:13–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Valente M, Milani G (2016) Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constr Build Mater 108:74–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Milano L, Mannella A, Morisi C, Martinelli A (2009) Schede illustrative dei principali meccanismi di collasso locali negli edifici esistenti in muratura e dei relativi modelli cinematici di analisi, ReLUIS, Allegato alle Linee Guida per la Riparazione e il Rafforzamento di Elementi Strutturali, Tamponature e PartizioniGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mc4 Loc Software (2014) L’analisi dei meccanismi locali (technical manual)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Munari M, Bettiol G, Da Porto F, Milano L, Modena C (2010) Esempio di calcolo su rafforzamento locale di edifici in muratura con tiranti, ReLUIS, Allegato alle Linee Guida per la Riparazione e il Rafforzamento di Elementi Strutturali, Tamponature e Partizioni (updated version)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jurina L (2012) Il consolidamento del Duomo di Cremona, Politecnico di Milano, DISGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hadianfard MA, Rabiee R, Sarshad A (2016) Assessment of vulnerability and dynamic characteristics of a historical building using microtremor measurements. Int J Civ Eng. doi: 10.1007/s40999-016-0086-2 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Structural MechanicsUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
  2. 2.Department of EngineeringUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations