Advertisement

International Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 175–183 | Cite as

Assessment of Vulnerability and Dynamic Characteristics of a Historical Building Using Microtremor Measurements

  • Mohammad Ali HadianfardEmail author
  • Ramin Rabiee
  • Azad Sarshad
Research Paper

Abstract

Microtremor measurement is a precise and applicable technique for evaluating structural dynamic characteristics and vulnerability index of historical buildings. In this research, a historical citadel in Iran has been considered. Karim Khan Citadel (Arg-e Karim Khan) is a huge masonry structure, which has been built in the seventeenth century in Shiraz, Iran. The plan of this building has a rectangular shape and has a circular tower in each corner. The height of each three-story circular tower is 14 m, and the height of walls between each of the two towers is 12 m. One of these towers has been swerved, and for preventing its collapse, concrete was injected to the foundation of this tower. To study seismic behavior and vulnerability of the swerved tower and compare it with other straight tower, microtremor measurements were performed. Measurements were done on the center of each tower and its basement simultaneously. For determining natural frequency and damping ratio of each tower, floor spectral ratio and random decrement method were used, respectively. Results show that the natural frequency and damping ratio of the swerved tower are 1.9 Hz and 1.55 %, while dynamic parameters of the straight tower are 2.12 Hz and 3.86 %, respectively. In addition, the towers frequencies are very different to the site frequency (4.18 Hz); therefore, the resonance phenomenon is not probable. In addition, the vulnerability indexes of the swerved and straight towers were calculated 131.31 and 76.9, respectively, which shows that the swerved tower is more vulnerable.

Keywords

Karim Khan Citadel Microtremor measurements Floor spectral ratio Random decrement method Dynamic characteristics Vulnerability index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Fars Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization for their cooperation in letting us do the experiments in the middle of the night.

References

  1. 1.
    Mottale MJ, Shiraz Municipality. Shirazcity.org. Retrieved (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mottale MJ, Shiraz Municipality. Shirazcity.org. Retrieved (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander JE (1827) Travels from India to England: comprehending a visit to the Burman Empire. Parbury, Allen, p 125Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gosar A (2010) Site effects and soil–structure resonance study in the Kobarid basin (NW Slovenia) using microtremors. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:761–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cole MA (1973) Online failure detection and damping measurements of aerospace structures by random decrement signature. NASSA CR 2205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herak M (2009) Recent applications of ambient vibration measurements in Croatia. In: Mucciarelli M, Herak M, Cassidy J (eds) Increasing seismic safety by combining engineering technologies and seismological data. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herak M (2011) Overview of recent ambient noise measurements in Croatia in free-field and in buildings. Geofizika 28:21–40Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farsi MN, Chatelain JL, Guillier B, Bouchelouh A (2010) Evaluation of the quality of repairing and strengthening of buildings. In: Proceedings of the 14th ECEEGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakamura Y, Gurler ED, Saita J, Rovelli A, Donati S (2000) Vulnerability investigation of roman colosseum using microtremor. In: Presented at 12th WCEE 2000 in Auckland, NZ 2660/6/AGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sato T, Nakamura Y, Saita J, (2008) The change of dynamic characteristics using microtremor. In: Proceedings of the 14th WCEEGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakamura Y, Saita J, Sato T (2009) Applications to work heritage site. In: Mucciarelli M, Herak M, Cassidy J (eds) Increasing seismic safety by combining engineering technologies and seismological data. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–292Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shingu Ak, Irie T (2004) A study on damping characteristics of shell and spacial structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper No. 1162Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakamura Y, Sato T, Saita J (2002) Development of vulnerability assessment models using microtremor. In: Prepared for 5th EQTAP workshop in Bangkok, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gosar A, Rošer J (2010) Microtremor study of site effects and soil–structure resonance in the city of Ljubljana. Bull Earthq Eng 8(3):571–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeary AP (1986) Damping in tall buildings—a mechanism and a predictor. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 14:733–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davenport AG, Hill-Carroll P (1986) Damping in tall buildings: its variability and treatment in design. In: Proceedings of ASCE spring convention, building motion in wind, pp 42–57Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lagomarsino S (1993) Forecast models for damping and vibration periods of building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 48:211–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tamura Y, Shimada K, Hibi K (1993) Wind response of a tower (typhoon observation at the Nagasaki Huis Ten Bosch Domtoren). J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 50:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kareem A, Gurley K (1996) Damping in structures: its evaluation and treatment of uncertainty. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 59:131–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arakawa T, Yamamoto K (2002) The evaluation of the first mode damping ratios using the system identifications based on microtremors of a high-rise building. In: Proceedings of 2nd structural engineers world congressGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arakawa T, Yamamoto K (2004) Frequencies and damping ratios of a high rise building based on microtremor measurements.In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Satake N, Suda K, Arakawa T, Sasaki A, Tamura Y (2003) Damping evaluation using full-scale data of buildings in Japan. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(4):470–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iiba M, Watakabe M, Fujii A, Koyama Sh, Sakai Sh, Morita K (2004) A study on dynamic soil-structure interaction effect based on microtremor measurement of building and surrounding ground surface. In: Proceedings of the third UJNR workshop on soil–structure interaction, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sungkono D, Warnana D, Triwulan Utama W (2011) Evaluation of buildings strength from microtremor analyses. Int J Civ Environ Eng 11(5):108–114Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Palmisano F, Elia A (2014) Assessment of masonry buildings subjected to landslide by using the load path method. Int J Civ Eng 12(2):312–330Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tootoonchy F, Asgarian B, Danesh F (2015) Experimental in-plane behavior and retrofitting method of mud-brick walls. Int J Civ Eng 13(2):191–201Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tasnimi AA, Rezazadeh MA (2012) Experimental and numerical study of strengthened single storey brick building under torsional moment. Int J Civ Eng 10(3):232–244Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Irie Y, Nakamura K (2000) Dynamic characteristics of a r/c building of five stories based on microtremor measurements and earthquake observations. In: Proceeding of 12th world conference in earthquake engineering, Wellington, pp 500–508Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hosseini KA, Hosseini M, Jafari MK, Hosseinioon S (2009) Recognition of vulnerable urban fabrics in earthquake zones: a case study of the Tehran metropolitan area. J Seismol Earthq Eng (JSEE) 10(4):175–187Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dunand F, Bard PY, Chatelain JL, Gueguen PH, Vassail T, Farsi MN (2002) Damping and frequency from randomdec method applied to insitu measurement of ambient noise vibrations: evidence for effective soil–structure interaction. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, LondresGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sortis AD, Antonacci E, Vestroni F (2005) Dynamic identification of a masonry building using forced vibration tests. Eng Struct 27:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ivorra S, Pallares FJ (2006) Dynamic investigations on a masonry bell tower. Eng Struct 28:660–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Iran University of Science and Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Ali Hadianfard
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ramin Rabiee
    • 1
  • Azad Sarshad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringShiraz University of TechnologyShirazIran

Personalised recommendations