Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abstract

Dynamic energy management in smart grids courses to increase the system efficiency, not only does it decrease the economic costs, it also courses to reduce the environmental issues. One possible way to improve these benefits is to solve multiple smart grids problems simultaneously, which is called multi-area dynamic energy management. Demand-side management (DSM) is another way which has resulted in improving the current smart grid performance, and as a result, it can provide a wide range of benefits to the system. This paper is proposed a novel strategy to model the electric/thermal DSM with multi-area energy management in order to reduce economic costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, this paper has attempted to model the electric vehicles and PV renewable resources with uncertainty forms in smart grids. Moreover, the optimal utilization of the battery is formulated in the proposed model. The simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed mixed integer programming model in the DSM and energy management issues under inter-area power exchange limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(C_{i}^{\text{fix}} ,C_{i}^{\text{var}}\) :

The fixed and variable costs of the ith CHP, respectively

\(\partial_{i}^{{{\text{NO}}x}} ,\varsigma_{i}^{{{\text{SO}}x}} ,\psi_{i}^{{{\text{CO}}_{2} }}\) :

The NOx, SOx and CO2 emission costs of the ith CHP, respectively

\(C_{i}^{\text{up}} ,C_{i}^{\text{dw}}\) :

The cost of start-up and shutdown of the ith CHP, respectively

\(P_{i}^{\hbox{min} } ,P_{i}^{\hbox{max} }\) :

The minimum and maximum real power of the ith CHP, respectively

\(\eta_{i}\) :

The ith storage efficiency

\(\varOmega_{i}^{c,\hbox{min} } ,\varOmega_{i}^{c,\hbox{max} }\) :

The minimum and maximum charging power of the ith storage, respectively

\(\varOmega_{i}^{d,\hbox{min} } ,\varOmega_{i}^{d,\hbox{max} }\) :

The minimum and maximum discharging power of the ith storage, respectively

\(\varPi_{i}^{\hbox{max} }\) :

The maximum energy storage capacity of the ith storage

\(r_{i}^{\text{dw}} ,r_{i}^{\text{up}}\) :

The allowed downward and upward ramp rate of power changes of the ith CHP, respectively

\(\phi_{i}\) :

The number of times the ith storage is allowed to get charged

\(\lambda_{t} ,\omega_{t}\) :

The amount of electric and thermal flexible load at the time t, respectively

\(D_{t} ,D_{t}^{{\prime }}\) :

The electric and thermal load power of the grid at the time t, respectively

\({\rm T}_{\hbox{min} }^{k,h,f} ,{\rm T}_{\hbox{max} }^{k,h,f}\) :

The lowest and highest exchangeable power for the k, h, and f areas

\(\partial ,\varTheta\) :

The percentage of electric and thermal flexible load, respectively

\(\hbar_{i}\) :

The proportionality constant, called heat-to-power ratio of the ith CHP

\(\eta_{{i{\text{th}}}} ,\eta_{\text{ex}}\) :

Thermal efficiency of the ith CHP and efficiency of heat exchanger, respectively

\(\vartheta_{i}\) :

Heat rate of the ith CHP

\(P_{i,t} ,\varGamma_{i,t}\) :

The real and thermal power in CHP i at the time of t, respectively

\(\varOmega_{i,t}^{c} ,\varOmega_{i,t}^{d}\) :

The charging and discharging power of storage i at the time t, respectively

\(\varPi_{i,t}\) :

Energy status of storage i at the time t

\(D_{t}^{\text{DSM}} ,D_{t}^{{{\prime }{\text{DSM}}}}\) :

The new load changed at the time t in the demand-side management program

\(g_{i,t}^{\text{PV}}\) :

The power of the ith PV source at the time t

\(\varPsi_{t}\) :

The power of electric vehicle charging at the time t

\(\varUpsilon_{t}^{k}\) :

Total power exchanged in the system k at the time t

\(T_{t}^{k,h}\) :

The power exchange between system k and h at the time t

\(\Delta_{i,t} ,\nabla_{i,t}\) :

The Binary start-up/shutdown decision variables of CHP units in each hour at the time t, respectively

\(u_{i,t}\) :

Binary decision variable on/off status of CHP units in each hour at the time t

\(z_{i,t}\) :

The binary variable related to the storage i at the time t (indicates the off and on state of the storage i at the time t)

References

  • Abdi H, Dehnavi E, Mohammadi F (2016) Dynamic economic dispatch problem integrated with demand response (DEDDR) considering non-linear responsive load models”. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7(6):2586–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alham M, Elshahed M, Ibrahim DK, El Zahab EEDA (2016) A dynamic economic emission dispatch considering wind power uncertainty incorporating energy storage system and demand side management”. Renew Energy. 96:800–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alipour M, Mohammadi-ivatloo B (2015) Stochastic Scheduling of Renewable and CHP based Microgrids. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 10(8):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold M, Knöpfli S, Andersson G (2017) Improvement of OPF decomposition methods applied to multi-area power systems. http://www.eeh.ee.ethz.ch/uploads/tx_ethpublications/Arnold_. Accessed May 2017

  • Azizipanah-Abarghooee R, Dehghanian P, Terzija V (2016) Practical multi-area bi-objective environmental economic dispatch equipped with a hybrid gradient search method and improved Jaya algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(14):3580–3596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu M (2016) Quasi-oppositional group search optimization for multi-area dynamic economic dispatch. Int J Electr Power Energy Sys 78:356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu M (2019) Multi-region dynamic economic dispatch of solar–wind–hydro–thermal power system incorporating pumped hydro energy storage. Eng Appl Artif Intell 86:182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldeeb HH, Faddel S, Mohammed OA (2018) Multi-objective optimization technique for the operation of grid tied PV powered EV charging station. Electr Power Syst Res 164:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Aghaei J, Akbari E, Ghavidel S, Li L (2016) A differential evolution particle swarm optimizer for various types of multi-area economic dispatch problems. Energy 107:182–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo Y, Tong L, Wu W, Zhang B, Sun H (2017) Coordinated multi-area economic dispatch via critical region projection. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(5):3736–3746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou H, Xue M, Yan X, Xiao Z, Deng X, Tao X, Liu P, Cui R (2020) Multi-objective economic dispatch of a microgrid considering electric vehicle and transferable load. Appl Energy 262:114489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Wu W, Zhang B, Wang B (2016) Decentralized multi-area dynamic economic dispatch using modified generalized Benders decomposition. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(1):526–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Wang Z-J (2019) Multi-area economic dispatch using an improved stochastic fractal search algorithm. Energy 166:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Wen F, Ledwich G (2011) Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generators in distribution systems considering uncertainties. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 26(4):2541–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokeshgupta B, Sivasubramani S (2018) Multi-objective dynamic economic and emission dispatch with demand side management. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 97:334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukarakis E, Dent CJ, Bialek JW (2016) Decentralized multi-period economic dispatch for real-time flexible demand management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(1):672–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoharan PS, Kannan PS, Baskar S, WilljuiceIruthayarajan M (2009) Evolutionary algorithm solution and KKT based optimality verification to multi-area economic dispatch”. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 31(7):365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narimani H, Razavi S-E, Azizivahed A, Naderi E, Fathi M, Ataei MH, RasoulNarimani M (2018) A multi-objective framework for multi-area economic emission dispatch. Energy 154:126–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikmehr N, Najafi-Ravadanegh S (2016) Optimal operation of distributed generations in micro-grids under uncertainties in load and renewable power generation using heuristic algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 9(8):982–990

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit M, Jain K, Dubey HM, Singh R (2017) Large scale multi-area static/dynamic economic dispatch using nature inspired optimization. J Inst Eng (India) Ser B 98:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan A, Malakar T (2016) Optimum economic and emission dispatch using exchange market algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 82:545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaabani YA, Seifi AR, Kouhanjani MJ (2017) Stochastic multi-objective optimization of combined heat and power economic/emission dispatch. Energy 141:1892–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Use of national surveys for estimating ‘full’ PHEV potential for oil use reduction. http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/HV/525.pdf

  • Wu L (2019) A transformation-based multi-area dynamic economic dispatch approach for preserving information privacy of individual areas. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(1):722–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakariazadeh A, Jadid S, Siano P (2014) Multi-objective scheduling of electric vehicles in smart distribution system. Energy Convers Manag 79:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaman F, Elsayed SM, Ray T, Sarker RA (2016) Configuring two-algorithm-based evolutionaryapproach for solving dynamic economic dispatch problems”. Eng Appl ArtifIntell 53:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Cheng H, Zhang L, Bazargan M, Yao L (2013) Probabilistic evaluation of available load supply capability for distribution system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28(3):3215–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao W, Liu M, Zhu J, Li L (2016) Fully decentralised multi-area dynamic economic dispatch for large-scale power systems via cutting plane consensus. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(10):2486–2495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng W, Wu W (2019) Distributed multi-area load flow for multi-microgrid systems. IET Gener Trans Distrib 13(3):327–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou DX, Li S, Wang GG, Li ZY (2016) Ouyang HB”, An improved differential evolution algorithm for the economic load dispatch problems with or without valve-point effects”. Appl Energy 181:375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Bahmani Firouzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hormozi, M.A., Bahmani Firouzi, B. & Niknam, T. A Novel Strategy for Multi-area Dynamic Energy Management. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 45, 115–129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-020-00340-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-020-00340-6

Keywords

Navigation