Skip to main content
Log in

An Engineering Predictive Approach of Multiaxial Fatigue Life of Defective Material Based on Affected Depth

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An engineering predictive approach to determine the fatigue limit of defective material under multiaxial loading will be presented. The proposed approach is based on the affected depth model recently proposed. The affected depth model is founded on a critical depth parameter deduced from the analysis of the stress distribution in the vicinity of the defect. It is shown that the crack propagation plan is perpendicular to the direction of the maximum principal stress. Subsequently, the variation of the principal stresses during a loading cycle is studied. The finite element method is used to analyze the stress state at the instant on which the maximum principal stress reaches its maximum value. This study allows us to (i) extend the affected depth approach to multiaxial loadings and (ii) to obtain a resistance condition that leads to assess the fatigue life of a defective material submitted to combined loading. The extended approach is applied for defective medium Carbon steel under in-phase and out-of-phase combined loading. The predicted multiaxial fatigue limits are in good agreement with experimental investigations and confirm that the affected depth parameter can characterize the fatigue behavior under combined loadings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\({a}_{w}\) :

Affected depth at the fatigue limit [μm]

\(\sqrt {area}\) :

Equivalent defect size of defect perpendicular to the direction of the maximum principal stress [µm]

HCF:

High Cycle Fatigue

HLP:

Highest Loaded Plan

\(\sqrt{{J}_{2,a}}\) :

Square root of the second invariant of the stress deviator [MPa]

P max :

The hydrostatic stress [MPa]

\({R}_{\sigma }\) :

Load ratio:\({R}_{\sigma }=\frac{{\sigma }_{min}}{{\sigma }_{max}}\)

\(\underline{\underline{S}}({t}_{i})\) and \(\underline{\underline{S}}({t}_{j})\) :

The periodic deviator stress tensor in two diverse instants (\({t}_{i}\) and \({t}_{j}\)).

\({\alpha }_{C}\) :

Coefficient in Crossland criterion

\({\beta }_{C}\) :

Material parameter in Crossland criterion [MPa]

\({\sigma }_{a}\) :

Amplitude of the tension loading [MPa]

\({\sigma }_{D-1}\) :

Fatigue limit under fully reversed tension of the defect-free material [MPa]

\({\sigma }_{eq}^{Cr}\) :

Crossland equivalent stress [MPa]

\({\tau }_{a}\) :

Amplitude of the torsion loading [MPa]

\({\tau }_{D-1}\) :

Fatigue limit under fully reversed torsion of the defect-free material [MPa]

\(\Delta {K}_{th}\) :

Threshold value of the stress intensity factor

\({\Delta \sigma }_{0}\) :

Plain-specimen fatigue limit

L :

Threshold of a non-propagating crack length

CDM:

Critical distances model

References

  • Atzori B, Lazzarin P, Meneghetti G (2005) A unified treatment of the mode I fatigue limit of components containing notches or defects. Int J Fract 133:61

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Billaudeau Y, Nadot GB (2004) Multiaxial fatigue limit for defective materials: mechanism and experiments. Acta Mater 52:3911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossland B (1956) In: Proceeding of international conference on fatigue of metals, (institution of mechanical engineers, London,) pp 138–149

  • Endo (1999) M In Proceeding of third Engineering Foundation International Conference; Small fatigue Cracks: Mechanics, Mechanisms and Applications, edited by K.S. Ravichandran, R. O. Ritchie, Y. Murakami, (Elsevier, Hawaii, 1999) pp. 375–387

  • Endo M, Ishimoto I (2006) The fatigue strength of steels containing small holes under out-of-phase combined loading. Int J Fatigue 28:592–597

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El Haddad MH, Topper TH, Smith KN (1979) Fatigue crack propagation of short cracks. J Engng Mater Tech (ASME Trans) 101:42–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannis V (2001) Papadopoulos long life fatigue under multiaxial loading. Int J Fatigue 23:839–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdiarmid DL (1973) A general criterion of Fatigue Failure under Multiaxial Stress. In: Proceedings of second international conference on pressure vessel technology, american society for testing and materials, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A,

  • Murakami Y (2002) Metal fatigue: effects of small defects and non metallic inclusion. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami Y, Endo M (1992) The area parameter model for small defects and non metallic inclusion in fatigue strength: experimental evidences and application. In: Blom AF, Beevers CJ (eds) Theoretical concepts and numerical analysis of fatigue. EMAS, Birmingham, UK, pp 51–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadot Y, Mendez J, Ranganathan N, Beranger AS (1998) Fatigue life assessment of nodular cast iron containing casting defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 22:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadot Y, Billaudeau T (2005) Multiaxial fatigue limit criterion for defective materials. Eng Fracture Mech. 73(1):112–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr A, Hassine W, Bouraoui CH (2017) Fatigue limit assessment for defective materials based on affected depth. Metall Res Technol 114(5):505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr A, Hassine W, Saggar M, Bouraoui Ch (2018) High cycle fatigue approach based on affected depth and considering the secondary dendrite arming spacing (SDAS) effect for a defective A356–T6 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(9):2579–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susmel L, Taylor D (2003) Fatigue design in the presence of stress concentrations. Int J Strain Anal Eng Components vol 750 38(5), pp 443

  • Taylor D (1999) Geometrical effects in fatigue: a unifying theoretical model. Int J Fatigue 21:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor D (2001) Fatigue Fract. Eng Mater Struc 24(215):749

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent M, Nadot-Martin C, Nadot Y, Dragon A (2014) Fatigue from defect under multiaxial loading: defect stress gradient (DSG) approach using ellipsoidal equivalent inclusion method. Int J Fatigue 9:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anouar Nasr.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassine, W., Nasr, A. & Bouraoui, C. An Engineering Predictive Approach of Multiaxial Fatigue Life of Defective Material Based on Affected Depth. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 47, 1265–1273 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00579-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-022-00579-w

Keywords

Navigation