Abstract
In this study, numerical calculations were conducted over 3D wing surface with varying winglet configuration and their modifications to understand effect of wingtip device on induced drag formation. NACA0012 airfoil was used for all configurations due to availability of experimental lift and drag data. Lift, drag and pressure coefficient were calculated with SST turbulence model at the Reynolds numbers of 6 × 106 and were compared with experimental data to validate the simulation accuracy of numerical approaches. The winglet with different relative angle with wing surface was designed, and numerical calculation was performed with commercial software COMSOL. The winglets attached to the wingtip were divided into 3 different categories such as single winglet up or down sloping, split winglet up and down sloping. To see normal wingtip vortex, conventional wingtip was simulated together with winglet in all cases. Pressure coefficient for the midline section of the wing is in a good agreement with the experimental data, but pressure coefficient at the tip section is very different. Maximum size of vortices was observed for the case of winglet 45° up sloping with the surface, but with the increasing winglet angle with the surface, size of vortex decreases. Results indicate that wingtip vortex formation was reduced considerably at the angle of attack relative to wing surface starting from 90° and considering only lift and pressure coefficients, up-sloping winglet can be considered to be more efficient than down sloped one and maximum efficiency increased between 4 and 6%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \( c_{P} \) :
-
Pressure coefficient
- \( c_{L} \) :
-
Lift coefficient
- \( f_{w1} \) :
-
Damping function
- \( P \) :
-
Static pressure
- \( P_{\infty } \) :
-
Free stream pressure
- \( U_{r} \) :
-
Relative velocity
- \( U_{\infty } \) :
-
Free stream velocity (wind velocity)
- \( v \) :
-
Kinematic viscosity
- \( c \) :
-
Airfoil chord
- \( t \) :
-
Percentage of the maximum thickness
- \( k \) :
-
Turbulence kinetic energy
- \( \kappa \) :
-
Von Kármán constant,
- \( l_{\text{ref}} \) :
-
Reference length scale
- L:
-
Length scale of flow
- \( \varepsilon \) :
-
Turbulence dissipation rate
- \( \omega \) :
-
Specific dissipation rate
- \( \omega_{t} \) :
-
Wall vorticity at the trip
- ρ :
-
Density
- \( \rho_{\infty } \) :
-
Freestream density
- \( \mu \) :
-
Dynamic viscosity
- S :
-
Magnitude of the vorticity
- \( \tilde{S} \) :
-
Modified vorticity
- \( S_{ij} \) :
-
Mean strain rate
- \( \varOmega_{ij} \) :
-
Mean rotation rate
- \( \mu_{\text{eff}} \) :
-
Effective dynamic viscosity
- \( \alpha \) :
-
Angle of attack
- \( \emptyset \) :
-
Scalar quantity of the flow
- CFD:
-
Computational fluid dynamics
- RANS:
-
Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes
- SST:
-
Shear stress transport
References
Bennett D, Covert E, Oliver T (2001) The wing grid: a new approach to reducing induced drag. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Boeing 747-400 (2017). http://www.larc.nasa.gov. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
COMSOL CFD module user guide (2017). http://www.comsol.com. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Forrester TJ, Tinoco EN, Yu NJ (2005) Thirty years of development and application of CFD at boeing commercial airplanes. Comput Fluids 34(11):1115–1151
Goldberg UC, Batten P (2015) A wall-distance-free version of the SST turbulence model. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 9(1):33–40
Gregory N, O’Reilly CL (1970) Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 0012 aerofoil section, including the effects of upper-surface roughness simulating hoar frost, A.R.C., R. & M. no. 3726
Ilan K (2001) Drag due to lift: concepts for prediction and reduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:587–617
Ladson CL (1988) Effects of independent variation of mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section. NASA TM 4074
McLean D (2005) Wingtip devices: what they do and how they do it. In: Boeing performance and flight operations engineering conference 2005, pp1–20
Menter FR (1992) Improved two-equation k–w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, NASA technical memorandum 103975, October 1992
Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605
Menter FR (2009) Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 23(4):305–316
Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R (2003) Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model, Software Development Department ANSYS–CFX
Neal L, Harrison N, Mujezinovic D (2004) Wingtip devices. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, pp 1–27
Originating Technology/NASA Contribution (2017). https://spinoff.nasa.gov. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Raymer DP (1999) Aircraft design: a conceptual approach, 3rd edn. AIAA, Reston
Schauerhamer DG, Robinson SK (2017) Aircraft effects in wake vortex decay simulations, AIAA Paper 2017-3035
Sogukpinar H (2017) Numerical simulation of 4-digit inclined NACA 00xx airfoils to find optimum angle of attack for airplane wing. Uludag Univ J Fac Eng 22(1):169–178
Sogukpinar H (2018) The effects of NACA 0012 airfoil modification on aerodynamic performance improvement and obtaining high lift coefficient and post-stall airfoil. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1935, no 1. AIP Publishing
Sogukpinar H, Bozkurt I (2018) Implementation of different turbulence model to find proper model to estimate aerodynamic properties of airfoils. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1935, no 1. AIP Publishing
Turkish Technic: B737-800 winglet modification (2017). http://www.turkishtechnic.com. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Types of blended winglets (2017) Aviation partners. https://www.aviationpartners.com. Accessed 27 Dec 2017
Whitcomb RT (1976) A design approach and selected wind-tunnel results at high subsonic speeds for wing-tip mounted winglets, NASA-TN-D-8260
Yang H, Shen WZ, Xu HR, Hong ZD, Liu C (2014) Prediction of the wind turbine performance by using BEM with airfoil data extracted from CFD. Renew Energy 70:107–115
Zhang X, Li W, Liu H (2015) Numerical simulation of the effect of relative thickness on aerodynamic performance improvement of asymmetrical blunt trailing-edge modification. Renew Energy 80:489–497
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sogukpinar, H. Numerical Investigation of Influence of Diverse Winglet Configuration on Induced Drag. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng 44, 203–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-019-00278-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-019-00278-z