Advertisement

Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Porous Metal Matrix Composites Produced by Recycling of Bronze and Iron Chips

  • Ömer Sinan Şahin
  • Aydın GüneşEmail author
  • Abdullah Aslan
  • Emin Salur
  • Hakan Burak Karadağ
  • Ahmet Akdemir
Research Paper
  • 386 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the low-velocity impact behavior of porous metal matrix composites (MMCs) has been investigated. The MMCs consisting of spheroidal cast iron chips (GGG-40) and bronze chips (CuSn10) were produced by hot isostatic pressing. The MMCs were produced with different CuSn10 contents as 90–80–70–60%. The hot isostatic pressing was performed under three different pressures and temperatures. The produced MMCs were exposed to low-velocity impact loading under 2 m/s by using a drop weight test stand. The test results were compared with the bulk CuSn10 and bulk GGG-40, separately. The test results revealed that hot-isostatic-pressed MMCs can successfully represent bulk material properties when subjected to low-velocity impact loading even these MMCs have porosity 2–8%.

Keywords

Low-velocity impact Recycling Isostatic hot pressing Metal matrix composites (MMCs) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study has been financially funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under Grant Number: MAG-113M141.

References

  1. Abrate S (2005) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TL (2000) Fracture mechanics fundamentals and applications. CRC Press Inc., Baca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslan A (2014) Production of metal matrix composites by recycling of waste metal chips and their mechanical properties, Ms Thesis, Selçuk University, Department of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  4. Aslan A, Sahin OS, Salur E et al (2015) A new method for recycling of metal chips. J Selçuk Univ Nat Appl Sci 4(1):1Google Scholar
  5. Aydelotte BB, Thadhani NN (2013) Mechanistic aspects of impact initiated reactions inexplosively consolidated metal aluminum powder mixtures. Mater Sci Eng A 570:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa AP, Bobrovnitchii GS, Skury ALD et al (2010) Structure, microstructure and mechanical properties of pm fe–cu–co alloys. Mater Des 31:522–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourcier RJ, Koss DA, Smelser RE, Richmond O (1986) The influence of porosity on the deformation and fracture of alloys. Acta Metal 34:2443–2453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brochu M, Zimmerly T, Ajdelsztajn L, Lavernia EJ, Kim G (2007) Dynamic consolidation of nanostructured Al–7.5%Mg alloy powders. Mater Sci Eng, A 466:84–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrollt MM, Holt AC (1972) Static and Dynamic pore-collapse relations for ductile porous materials. J Appl Phys 43:1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chawla N, Deng X (2005) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of porous sintered steels. Mater Sci Eng, A 390A:98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dieter GE, Bacon DJ (2001) Mechanical metallurgy. McGraw-Hill, New York CityGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiedler T, Taherishargh M, Krstulović-Opara L, Vesenjak M (2015) Dynamic compressive loading of expanded perlite/aluminum syntactic foam. Mater Sci Eng, A 626:296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fogagnolo JB, Ruiz-Navas EM, Simón MA et al (2003) Recycling of aluminium alloy and aluminium matrix composite chips by pressing and hot extrusion. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:792–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. German RM (2001) Powder metallurgy & particulate materials processing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  15. Gourdin WH (1986) Dynamic consolidation of metal powders. Prog Mater Sci 30:39–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gronostajski J, Matuszak A (1999) The recycling of metals by plastic deformation: an example of recycling of aluminum and its alloy’s chips. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:34–41Google Scholar
  17. Gronostajski JZ, Kaczmar JW, Marciniak H et al (1997) Direct recycling of aluminum chips into extruded product. J Mater Process Technol 64:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gronostajski J, Marciniak H, Matuszak A (2000) New methods of aluminum and aluminum alloy chips recycling. J Mater Process Technol 106:34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guluzade R, Avcı A, Demirci MT, Erkendirci ÖF (2013) Fracture toughness of recycled AISI 1040 steel chip reinforced ALMG1SICU aluminium chip composites. Mater Des 52:345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kanel GI, Ivanov MF, Parshikov AN (1995) Computer simulation of the heterogeneous materials response to the impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 17:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karadağ HB (2012) Production and mechanical properties of steel/bronze chips composite, PhD Thesis, Selçuk University, Department of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Li JB, Zhang R (2004) Energy-absorption performance of porous materials in sandwich composites under hypervelocity impact loading. Compos Struct 64:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molinari A, Mercier S (2001) Micromechanical modelling of porous materials under dynamic loading. J Mech Phys Solids 49:1497–1516CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Nair AR, Mason BA, Groven LJ, Son SF, Strachan A, Cuitiño AM (2013) Micro-RVE modeling of mechanistic response in porous intermetallics subject to weak and moderate impact loading. Int J Plast 51:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Page NW, Killen PD, John DH (1990) Sintering enhancement in dynamically compacted commercial iron powders. Mater Sci Eng A 130:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Partom Y (2014) Modelling dynamic compaction of porous materials with the overstress approach. J Phys: Conf Ser 500:182030Google Scholar
  27. Sano T, Kato K, Takeishi H (1995) Analysis of dynamic deformation mechanisms in powder metals. J Mater Process Technol 48:391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sano T, Obinata A, Negishi H, Suginami K, Takeishi H (1997) Effects of temperature rise on dynamic powder compaction. J Mater Process Technol 67(19):23Google Scholar
  29. Shuyan W, Zesheng J, Tielei Z (2009) Microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ31B magnesium alloy recycled by solid-state process from different size chips. J Mater Process Technol 209:5319–5324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spitzig WA, Semlser RE, Richmond O (1998) The evolution of damage and fracture in iron compacts with various initial porosities. Acta Metal 36:1201–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tao Y, Ming-yi Z, Xiao-shi H et al (2010) Recycling of az91 mg alloy through consolidation of machined chips by extrusion and ECAP. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 20:604–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tong W, Ravichandran G (1993) Dynamic pore collapse in viscoplastic materials, 1993. J Appl Phys 74(4):2425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wei CT, Vitali E, Jiang F, Dub SW, Benson DJ, Vecchio KS, Thadhani NN, Meyers MA (2012) Quasi-static and dynamic response of explosively consolidated metal–aluminum powder mixtures. Acta Mater 60:1418–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ömer Sinan Şahin
    • 1
  • Aydın Güneş
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdullah Aslan
    • 1
  • Emin Salur
    • 1
  • Hakan Burak Karadağ
    • 2
  • Ahmet Akdemir
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSelcuk UniversityKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgy and Materials EngineeringN.Erbakan UniversityKonyaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Aircraft EngineeringN.Erbakan UniversityKonyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations