Advertisement

Simulation of Composite Laminate with Cohesive Interface Elements Under Low-Velocity Impact Loading

  • Enock A. Duodu
  • Jinan Gu
  • Wei Ding
  • Zhenyang Shang
  • Shixi Tang
Research Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, numerical model based on continuum damage mechanics is presented to predict the damage behavior in quasi-isotropic composite laminates under low-velocity impact conditions. Hashin criterion and a gradual degradation scheme are employed to trigger the intra-laminar damage initiation and growth. Additionally, an interface cohesive element is incorporated in the model to predict the inter-laminar delamination damages. A user-defined subroutine VUMAT comprising these constitutive models of intra-laminar and inter-laminar damage is written in FORTRAN and implemented into explicit finite element package ABAQUS. Parametric analysis is performed on quasi-isotropic composite model with different impact energy levels to study the impact velocity–time, velocity–displacement, acceleration–time and acceleration–displacement curves of full and reduced models as well as the damage development of intra-laminar matrix cracking and inter-laminar delamination. Reasonable accord between the numerical simulations and experimental test indicates good prediction of impact damage behavior of the proposed model at low-velocity impact conditions.

Keywords

Cohesive element Cross-ply composite Finite element model Low velocity Quasi-isotropic composite 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research is partially supported by the Innovative Foundation for Doctoral Candidate of Jiangsu Province, China (KYLX15_1049).

References

  1. Bouvet C, Castanié B, Bizeul M, Barrau J-J (2009) Low velocity impact modelling in laminate composite panels with discrete interface elements. Int J Solids Struct 46:2809–2821CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bui Q (2011) A modified Benzeggagh-Kenane fracture criterion for mixed-mode delamination. J Compos Mater 45(4):389–413Google Scholar
  3. Choi I-H, Kim I-G, Ahn S-M, Yeom C-H (2010) Analytical and experimental studies on the low-velocity impact response and damage of composite laminates under in-plane loads with structural damping effects. Compos Sci Technol 70:1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng D, Aymerich F (2014) Finite element modelling of damage induced by low-velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos Struct 108:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosur MV, Adbullah M, Jeelani S (2005) Studies on the low-velocity impact response of woven hybrid composites. Compos Struct 67:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jang J, Sung M, Han S, Yu W-R (2017) Prediction of delamination of steel-polymer composites using cohesive zone model and peeling tests. Compos Struct 160:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khalili SMR, Soroush M, Davar A, Rahmani O (2011) Finite element modeling of low-velocity impact on laminated composite plates and cylindrical shells. Compos Struct 93:1363–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar D, Roy R, Kweon J-H, Choi J-H (2016) Numerical modeling of combined matrix cracking and delamination in composite laminates using cohesive elements. Appl Compos Mater 23:397–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lachaud F, Espinosa C, Michel L, Rahme P, Piquet R (2015) Modelling strategies for simulating delamination and matrix cracking in composite laminates. Appl Compos Mater 22:377–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li X, Hallett SR, Wisnom MR (2008) Predicting the effect of through-thickness compressive stress on delamination using interface elements. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 39:218–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu P, Gu Z, Peng X, Zheng J (2015) Finite element analysis of the influence of cohesive law parameters on the multiple delamination behaviors of composites under compression. Compos Struct 131:975–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Long S, Yao X, Zhang X (2015) Delamination prediction in composite laminates under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct 132:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopes C, Camanho P, Gürdal Z, Maimí P, González E (2009a) Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part II: numerical simulations. Compos Sci Technol 69:937–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lopes C, Seresta O, Coquet Y, Gürdal Z, Camanho P, Thuis B (2009b) Low-velocity impact damage on dispersed stacking sequence laminates. Part I: experiments. Compos Sci Technol 69:926–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. May M (2015) Numerical evaluation of cohesive zone models for modeling impact induced delamination in composite materials. Compos Struct 133:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitrevski T, Marshall IH, Thomson RS, Jones R (2006) Low-velocity impacts on preloaded GFRP specimens with various impactor shapes. Compos Struct 76:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olsson R (2001) Analytical prediction of large mass impact damage in composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 32:1207–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sevkat E, Liaw B, Delale F (2013) Drop-weight impact response of hybrid composites impacted by impactor of various geometries. Mater Des 52:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi Y, Soutis C (2016) Modelling transverse matrix cracking and splitting of cross-ply composite laminates under four point bending. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 83:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C (2012) Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 94:2902–2913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shi Y, Pinna C, Soutis C (2014a) Modelling impact damage in composite laminates: a simulation of intra-and inter-laminar cracking. Compos Struct 114:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi Y, Pinna C, Soutis C (2014b) Interface cohesive elements to model matrix crack evolution in composite laminates. Appl Compos Mater 21:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soliman EM, Sheyka MP, Taha MR (2012) Low-velocity impact of thin woven carbon fabric composites incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Impact Eng 47:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiao S, Chen P, Ye Q (2014) Prediction of damage area in laminated composite plates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 98:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Systèmes, S-D. ABAQUS/Explicit (2011a) Version 6.11-1. User Documentation ManualsGoogle Scholar
  26. Systèmes, S-D. ABAQUS/Explicit (2011b) Version 6.11. User Manual. ABAQUS Inc, Providence, RI, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Zhang X (2015) An efficient approach for predicting low-velocity impact force and damage in composite laminates. Compos Struct 130:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang X, Bianchi F, Liu H (2012a) Predicting low-velocity impact damage in composites by a quasi-static load model with cohesive interface elements. Aeronaut J 116:1367–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang X, Bianchi F, Liu H (2012b) Predicting low-velocity impact damage in composites by a quasi-static load model with cohesive interface elements. Aeronaut J 116:1367–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang D, Sun Y, Chen L, Pan N (2013) A comparative study on low-velocity impact response of fabric composite laminates. Mater Des 50:750–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringJiangsu UniversityZhenjiangChina

Personalised recommendations