Advertisement

Application of Multi-speed Gearbox in Infinitely Variable Transmission

  • M. Khadem Nahvi
  • M. Delkhosh
  • M. Saadat Foumani
  • P. Rostami
Research Paper
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

One way to reduce vehicles’ fuel consumption (FC) is to optimize different parts of its powertrain. Among different modern powertrains, continuously variable transmission (CVT) is one of the common types which changes speed ratio between engine and wheels, continuously. Therefore, the CVT allows the engine to operate at its fuel-optimal speed. Due to the limited power transmission capacity and speed ratio range of the CVT, researchers attempted to combine the CVT with a planetary gear train and a fixed ratio mechanism. This mechanism is called infinitely variable transmission (IVT). In this study, a multi-speed gearbox (MSG) is used in the IVT and its impact on the powertrain performance and the vehicle’s FC is investigated. After extracting the governing dynamics of the system, an optimization on the parameters which affect the IVT performance is implemented to minimize the vehicle’s FC. It is observed that the vehicle’s FC for the case of using the optimized IVT equipped with two-speed MSG is almost 5% less than the case of using the optimized six-speed AT transmission in different driving cycles.

Keywords

Infinitely variable transmission Continuously variable transmission Fuel consumption Optimization Fixed ratio mechanism 

References

  1. Beachley N, Anscomb C, Burrows CR (1984) Evaluation of split-path extended range continuously-variable transmissions for automotive applications. J Franklin Inst 317(4):235–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bottiglione F, Mantriota G (2008) MG-IVT: an infinitely variable transmission with optimal power flows. J Mech Des 130(11):112603–112610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottiglione F, De Pinto S, Mantriota G (2014) Infinitely variable transmissions in neutral gear: torque ratio and power re-circulation. Mech Mach Theory 74:285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delkhosh M, Foumani MS (2013a) Multi-objective geometrical optimization of full toroidal CVT. Int J Automot Technol 14:707–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delkhosh M, Foumani MS (2013b) Optimization of full-toroidal continuously variable transmission in conjunction with fixed ratio mechanism using particle swarm optimization. Veh Syst Dyn 51(5):671–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delkhosh M, Foumani MS (2015) Introduction and optimization of a power split continuously variable transmission including several fixed ratio mechanisms. Sci Iran Trans B Mech Eng 22(1):226Google Scholar
  7. Delkhosh M, Foumani MS, Boroushaki M, Ekhtiari M, Dehghani M (2011) Geometrical optimization of half toroidal continuously variable transmission using particle swarm optimization. Sci Iran 18(5):1126–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delkhosh M, Foumani MS, Boroushaki M (2014) Geometrical optimization of parallel infinitely variable transmission to decrease vehicle fuel consumption. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 42(4):483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank AA (2004) Engine optimization concepts for CVT-hybrid systems to obtain the best performance and fuel efficiency (No. 2004-40-0056). SAE Technical PaperGoogle Scholar
  10. Gauthier JP, Micheau P (2010) A model based on experimental data for high speed steel belt CVT. Mech Mach Theory 45(11):1733–1744CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Hebbale K, Li D, Zhou J, Duan C, Kao CK, Samie F, Lee C, Gonzales R (2014, October) Study of a non-circular gear infinitely variable transmission. In: ASME 2014 dynamic systems and control conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V003T49A003–V003T49A003Google Scholar
  12. Kazemzadeh-Parsi MJ (2014) A modified firefly algorithm for engineering design optimization problems. Iran J Sci Technol 38(M2):403–421Google Scholar
  13. Mangialardi L, Mantriota G (1999) Power flows and efficiency in infinitely variable transmissions. Mech Mach Theory 34(7):973–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mantriota G (2001) Power split continuously variable transmission systems with high efficiency. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 215(3):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mantriota G (2002a) Performances of a series infinitely variable transmission with type I power flow. Mech Mach Theory 37(6):579–597CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Mantriota G (2002b) Performances of a parallel infinitely variable transmission with type II power flow. Mech Mach Theory 37(6):555–578CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Nair SS, Singh T (1992) A mathematical review and comparison of continuously variable transmissions. SAE paper, No. 922107, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  18. Pfiffner R, Guzzella L (2001) Optimal operation of CVT-based powertrains. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 11(11):1003–1021CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Pfiffner R, Guzzella L, Onder CH (2003) Fuel-optimal control of CVT powertrains. Control Eng Pract 11(3):329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srivastava N, Haque I (2008) Transient dynamics of metal V-belt CVT: effects of band pack slip and friction characteristic. Mech Mach Theory 43(4):459–479CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Yan HS, Hsieh LC (1994) Maximum mechanical efficiency of infinitely variable transmissions. Mech Mach Theory 29(5):777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Khadem Nahvi
    • 1
  • M. Delkhosh
    • 1
  • M. Saadat Foumani
    • 1
  • P. Rostami
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringSharif University of TechnologyTehranIslamic Republic of Iran

Personalised recommendations