Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic Vulnerability Control of Steel Moment–Resisting Frames Using Optimum Friction Tuned Mass Damper

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Friction tuned mass damper (FTMD) as one of the variety passive devices is a combination of the traditional TMD system with dry friction damping. This study presents the seismic vulnerability control of a 10-story steel moment–resisting frames (SMRFs) equipped with an optimized FTMD system. The optimized FTMD system placed in the roof story of the SMRF is first found through minimizing the maximum value of the Park–Ang damage index of stories averaged over seven scaled earthquake excitations. Further, the seismic damage induced by the scaled earthquake excitations is uniformly distributed throughout the height of the SMRF. Then, the seismic assessment of the SMRF with the optimized FTMD is implemented by fragility analysis. Results indicate that the seismic damage over the height of the optimized FTMD-equipped SMRF is uniformly distributed in comparison with that of the uncontrolled SMRF. The seismic fragility assessment also indicates that the optimized FTMD improves the seismic performance of the controlled SMRF compared to that of the uncontrolled SMRF at different damage states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdeddaim M, Djerouni S, Ounis A, Athamnia B, Noroozinejad FE (2022) Optimal design of magnetorheological damper for seismic response reduction of Base-Isolated structures considering Soil-Structure interaction. Structures 38:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (2017) Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures.

  • Arvind R, Santhi MH (2022) A state of art review on hybrid passive energy dissipating devices. J Vib Eng Technol 10:1931–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (2001) Evaluation of damage potential of recorded earthquake ground motion. Seismol Res Lett 72

  • Coello Coello CA (2002) Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:1245–1287

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cosenza E, Manfredi G (2000) Damage indices and damage measures. Prog Struct Mat Eng 2:50–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council AT, Agency USFEM (2009) Quantification of building seismic performance factors. US Department of Homeland Security, FEMA

  • Dolsek M (2009) Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 38:805–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etedali S, Akbari M, Seifi M (2019) MOCS-based optimum design of TMD and FTMD for tall buildings under near-field earthquakes including SSI effects. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 119:36–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gad AG (2022) Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications: a systematic review. Arch Comput Methods Eng 29:2531–2561

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gewei Z, Basu B (2011) A study on friction-tuned mass damper: harmonic solution and statistical linearization. J Vib Control 17:721–731

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gharehbaghi S (2018) Damage controlled optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete framed structures. Struct Eng Mech 65:53–68

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah A, Abou-Elfath H, Biddah A (1999) Response-based damage assessment of structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:79–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh S, Hasançebi O, Eser H, Koçkaya O (2022) Seismic collapse safety based optimization of steel Moment-Resisting frames. Structures 45:329–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Datta D, Katakdhond AA (2011) Estimation of the Park-Ang damage index for planar multi-storey frames using equivalent single-degree systems. Eng Struct 33:2509–2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Y, Xue Y, Xu L (2013) Optimal capacity design of eccentrically braced steel frameworks using nonlinear response history analysis. Eng Struct 48:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog JP (1985) Mechanical vibrations. Courier Corporation

  • He S, Wu QH, Wen JY, Saunders JR, Paton RC (2004) A particle swarm optimizer with passive congregation. Biosystems 78:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1489–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inaudi JA, Kelly JM (1995) Mass damper using friction-dissipating devices. J Eng Mech-Asce 121:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalayer F, Cornell CA (2004) A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor design (DCFD) seismic formats. Pacific Earthq Eng Res Center

  • Jarrahi H, Asadi A, Khatibinia M, Etedali S (2020a) Optimal design of rotational friction dampers for improving seismic performance of inelastic structures. J Build Eng 27:100960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrahi H, Asadi A, Khatibinia M, Etedali S, Samadi A (2020b) Simultaneous optimization of placement and parameters of rotational friction dampers for seismic-excited steel moment-resisting frames. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 136:106193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamgar R, Samea P, Khatibinia M (2018) Optimizing parameters of tuned mass damper subjected to critical earthquake. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 27:e1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Zolghadr A (2012) Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using a hybridized CSS-BBBC algorithm with trap recognition capability. Comput Struct 102–103:14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J,Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95—international conference on neural networks, vol 1944, pp 1942–1948

  • Khatibinia M, Gholami H, Kamgar R (2018) Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. Int J Dyn Control 6:1094–1104

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M, Jalaipour M, Gharehbaghi S (2019) Shape optimization of U-shaped steel dampers subjected to cyclic loading using an efficient hybrid approach. Eng Struct 197:108874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M, Ahrari A, Gharehbaghi S, Sarafrazi SR (2021) An efficient approach for optimum shape design of steel shear panel dampers under cyclic loading. Smart Struct Syst Int J 27:547–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatibinia M, Akbari S, Yazdani H, Gharehbaghi S (2024) Damage-based optimal control of steel moment-resisting frames equipped with tuned mass dampers. J Vib Control 30:659–672

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-Y, Lee C-H (2020) Analysis and optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers with coulomb dry friction. Eng Struct 209:110011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM, Lobo RF (1992) IDARC Version 3.0: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of reinforced concrete structures

  • Léger P, Kervégant G, Tremblay R (2010) Incremental dynamic analysis of nonlinear structures: selection of input ground motions, vol 1, pp 311–320

  • Lignos DG, Kolios D, Miranda E (2010) Fragility assessment of reduced beam section moment connections. J Struct Eng 136:1140–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louroza MA, Roitman N, Magluta C (2005) Vibration reduction using passive absorption system with Coulomb damping. Mech Syst Signal Process 19:537–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mander JB, Dhakal RP, Mashiko N, Solberg KM (2007) Incremental dynamic analysis applied to seismic financial risk assessment of bridges. Eng Struct 29:2662–2672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F (2011) OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng 13:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohebbi M, Joghataie A (2012) Designing optimal tuned mass dampers for nonlinear frames by distributed genetic algorithms. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 21:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr A, Mrad C, Nasri R (2018) Friction tuned mass damper optimization for structure under harmonic force excitation. Struct Eng Mech 65

  • Park YJ, Ang AHS (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 111:722–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park Y-J, Ang AH-S, Wen YK (1985) Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. J Struct Eng 111:740–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisal AY, Jangid RS (2016) Dynamic response of structure with tuned mass friction damper. Int J Adv Struct Eng 8:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujades LG, Vargas-Alzate YF, Barbat AH, González-Drigo JR (2015) Parametric model for capacity curves. Bull Earthq Eng 13:1347–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhorn A, Roh H, Sivaselvan M, Kunnath S, Valles RE, Madan A, Li C, Lobo R, Park YJ (2009) IDARC 2D Version 7.0: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of structures

  • Ricciardelli F, Vickery BJ (1999) Tuned vibration absorbers with dry friction damping. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:707–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shayesteh Bilondi MR, Yazdani H, Khatibinia M (2018) Seismic energy dissipation-based optimum design of tuned mass dampers. Struct Multidiscip Optim 58:2517–2531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360), pp 69–73

  • Tell S, Leander J, Andersson A, Ülker-Kaustell M (2021) Probability-based evaluation of the effect of fluid viscous dampers on a high-speed railway bridge. Struct Infrastruct Eng 17:1730–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirca L, Chen L, Tremblay R (2015) Assessing collapse safety of CBF buildings subjected to crustal and subduction earthquakes. J Constr Steel Res 115:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:491–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton GB (1982) Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10:381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton GB, Ayorinde EO (1980) Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 8:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams MS, Sexsmith RG (1995) Seismic damage indices for concrete structures: a state-of-the-art review. Earthq Spectra 11:319–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KK (2008) Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with tuned mass dampers. J Eng Mech 134:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KKF, Chee YL (2004) Energy dissipation of tuned mass dampers during earthquake excitations. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 13:105–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong KK, Johnson J (2009) Seismic energy dissipation of inelastic structures with multiple tuned mass dampers. J Eng Mech 135:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Wang W, Alam MS (2022a) Seismic evaluation of friction spring-based self-centering braced frames based on life-cycle cost. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 51:3393–3415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Wang W, Fang C (2022b) Evaluation of a full-scale friction spring-based self-centering damper considering cumulative seismic demand. J Struct Eng 148:04021281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran

    Mohsen Khatibinia, Shima Bijari & Fatemeh Sadat Moosavi Nezhad

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Sadjad Gharehbaghi

Authors
  1. Mohsen Khatibinia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shima Bijari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatemeh Sadat Moosavi Nezhad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sadjad Gharehbaghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by M. Khatibinia and F. S. Moosavi Nezhad. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Sh. Bijari and S. Gharehbaghi, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. M. Khatibinia read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Khatibinia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical Standards

There are no ethical concerns in this research work.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khatibinia, M., Bijari, S., Nezhad, F.S.M. et al. Seismic Vulnerability Control of Steel Moment–Resisting Frames Using Optimum Friction Tuned Mass Damper. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01453-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01453-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation