Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing Accuracy of Forecasting Monthly Reservoir Inflow by Using Comparison of Three New Hybrid Models: A Case Study of The Droodzan Dam in Iran

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Predicting the reservoir inflows plays a central role in the control and management of water resources and the related activities, such as the reservoir exploitation and flood/drought control. The complex nature of the hydrological systems and difficulties in their application processes have urged the researchers to look for more efficient reservoir-inflow modeling methods. Aimed at this objective, the current study developed three SVM-GA, ANFIS-GA and ARIMA-LSTM hybrid models, compared their performances with one another as well as with LSTM, SVM, ANFIS and ARIMA models and SWAT hydrological model in predicting the inflows to the Droodzan Dam reservoir in Fars Province, Iran, and evaluated their results using such statistical criteria as the RMSE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and R2. In short, the results revealed that the combined methods performed better than the single models and ARIMA-LSTM and LSTM predicted the monthly reservoir inflows more accurately (R2 = 0.9272, 0.8805, training, and R2 = 0.9097, 0.8148, testing). Among the three combined and four single studied models, ARIMA-LSTM showed higher accuracy and had better potential in predicting the monthly reservoir inflows in arid and semi-arid regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AlDahoul N, Ahmed AN, Allawi MF, Sherif M, Sefelnasr A, Chau KW, El-Shafie A (2022) A comparison of machine learning models for suspended sediment load classification. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 16(1):1211–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Allawi MF, Ahmed ML, Aidan IA, Deo RC, El-Shafie A (2021a) Developing reservoir evaporation predictive model for successful dam management. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35:499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allawi MF, Aidan IA, El-Shafie A (2021b) Enhancing the performance of data-driven models for monthly reservoir evaporation prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:8281–8295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allawi MF, Hussain IR, Salman MI, El-Shafie A (2021c) Monthly inflow forecasting utilizing advanced artificial intelligence methods: a case study of Haditha Dam in Iraq. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35(11):2391–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asefa T, Kemblowski MW, McKee M, Khalil A (2006) Multi-time scale stream flow predictions: the support vector machines approach. J Hydrol 318:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Xie J, Wang X, Li C (2016) Model fusion approach for monthly reservoir inflow forecasting. J Hydroinf 18(4):634–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Sun Z, Zeng B, Long J, Li C, Zhang J (2018) Reservoir inflow forecast using a clustered random deep fusion approach in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. J Hydrol Eng 23(10):04018041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1976) Time series analysis, forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (2008) Time series analysis: forecasting and control, 4th edn. Wiley and Sons, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorg-Haddad O, Aboutalebi M, Ashofteh PS, Loáiciga HA (2018) Real-time reservoir operation using data mining techniques. Environ Monit Assess 190(10):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau KW, Wu CL, Li YS (2005) Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J Hydrol Eng 10(6):485–491

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly P, Haché M, Fortin V, Bobée B (2005) Improving daily reservoir inflow forecasts with model combination. J Hydrol Eng 10(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dariane AB, Azimi S (2018) Streamflow forecasting by combining neural networks and fuzzy models using advanced methods of input variable selection. J Hydroinf 20(2):520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibike YB, Yelickov S, Solomatine DP, Abbott MB (2001) Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and application. J Comput Civil Eng Manag 15(3):208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan T, Sicard A, Glémin S, Lascoux M (2024) Separating phases of allopolyploid evolution with resynthesized and natural Capsella bursa-pastoris. eLife 12:RP88398. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88398.3

  • Ehteram M, Afan HA, Dianatikhah M, Ahmed AN, Ming Fai C, Hossain MS, Elshafie A (2019) Assessing the predictability of an improved ANFIS model for monthly streamflow using lagged climate indices as predictors. Water 11(6):1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslamian S, Eslamian F (eds) (2022) Handbook of HydroInformatics: Volume I: Classic Soft-Computing Techniques. . Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani M, Quinn JD, Herman JD, Castelletti A, Reed PM (2017) Scalable multiobjective control for large-scale water resources systems under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 26(4):1492–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadr M, Schlenkhoff A (2018) Data-driven stochastic modeling for multi-purpose reservoir simulation. J Appl Water Eng Res 6(1):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khorram S, Jehbez N (2023) A hybrid CNN-LSTM approach for monthly reservoir inflow forecasting. Water Resour Manage 37:4097–4121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Heo JH, Jeong CS (2006) Multireservoir system optimization in the Han River Basin using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Hydrol Process 20(9):2057–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kişi Ö (2004) River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng 9(1):60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koycegiz C, Buyukyildiz M (2019) Calibration of SWAT and two data-driven models for a data-scarce mountainous headwater in semi-arid Konya closed basin. Water 11(1):147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzert F, Klotz D, Brenner C, Schulz K, Herrnegger M (2018) Rainfall–runoff modelling using long short-term memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22(11):6005–6022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SY, Hamlet AF, Fitzgerald CJ, Burges SJ (2009) Optimized flood control in the Columbia River Basin for a global warming scenario. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(6):440–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Yan K, Zhao X, Hu Y (2016) Prediction of autogenous shrinkage of concretes by support vector machine. Int J Pavem Res Technol 9(3):169–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukika KN, Venkata Reddy K, Durga Rao KHV, Singh A (2020) Estimation of Groundwater Recharge Rate Using SWAT MODFLOW Model. In: Ghosh JK, da Silva I (eds) Applications of Geomatics in Civil Engineering: Select Proceedings of ICGCE 2018. Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7067-0_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi, K., Eslami, H. R., & Dayani, D. S. (2005). Comparison of regression, ARIMA and ANN models for reservoir inflow forecasting using snowmelt equivalent (a case study of Karaj).‏

  • Nadiri AA, Shokri S, Tsai FTC, Moghaddam AA (2018) Prediction of effluent quality parameters of a wastewater treatment plant using a supervised committee fuzzy logic model. J Clean Prod 180:539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noori R, Karbassi AR, Mehdizadeh H, Vesali NM, Sabahi MS (2011) A framework development for predicting the longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams using an artificial neural network. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 29:439–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira R, Loucks DP (1997) Operating rules for multireservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan P, Tingsanchali T, Shrestha S (2020) Evaluation of soil and water assessment tool and artificial neural network models for hydrologic simulation in different climatic regions of Asia. Sci Total Environ 701:134308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raihan F, Beaumont LJ, Maina J, Saiful Islam A, Harrison SP (2020) Simulating streamflow in the Upper Halda Basin of southeastern Bangladesh using SWAT model. Hydrol Sci J 65(1):138–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raso L, Chiavico M, Dorchies D (2019) Optimal and centralized reservoir management for drought and flood protection on the Upper Seine-Aube river system using stochastic dual dynamic programming. J Water Resour Plan Manag 145:05019002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MJ, Kumar DN (2006) Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Water Resour Manag 20(6):861–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schardong A, Simonovic SP, Vasan A (2013) Multiobjective evolutionary approach to optimal reservoir operation. J Comput Civ Eng 27(2):139–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour M, Banihabib ME, Behbahani SMR (2013) Comparison of the ARMA, ARIMA, and the autoregressive artificial neural network models in forecasting the monthly inflow of Dez dam reservoir. J Hydrol 476:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer New York, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Du YH, Zhang XT (2008) Theory and application with seasonal time series, 1st edn. Nankai University Press, Nankai

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZY, Qiu J, Li FF (2018) Hybrid models combining EMD/EEMD and ARIMA for Long-term streamflow forecasting. Water 10(7):853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenjian W, Changqian M, Weizhen L (2008) Online prediction model based on support vector machine. Neurocomputing 71(5):550–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Yafouz A, AlDahoul N, Birima AH, Ahmed AN, Sherif M, Sefelnasr A, Elshafie A (2022) Comprehensive comparison of various machine learning algorithms for short-term ozone concentration prediction. Alex Eng J 61(6):4607–4622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang CC, Chang LC, Yeh CH, Chen CS (2007) Multiobjective planning of surface water resources by multiobjective genetic algorithm with constrained differential dynamic programming. J Water Resour Plann Manag 133(6):499–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GP (2003) Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing 50:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Singh VP (2018) Univariate streamflow forecasting using commonly used data-driven models: literature review and case study. Hydrol Sci J 63(7):1091–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Peng Q, Lin J, Wang D, Liu X, Zhuang J (2019) Simulating reservoir operation using a recurrent neural network algorithm. Water 11(4):865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Zhou J, Ye L, Meng C (2016) Stream flow estimation by support vector machine coupled with different methods of time series decomposition in the upper reaches of Yangtze River, China. Environ Earth Sci 75(531):1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Khorram.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khorram, S., Jehbez, N. Enhancing Accuracy of Forecasting Monthly Reservoir Inflow by Using Comparison of Three New Hybrid Models: A Case Study of The Droodzan Dam in Iran. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01418-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01418-5

Keywords

Navigation