Abstract
In order to solve the problem that traditional stud shear connectors are no longer suitable for assembled steel–concrete beams, a new type of shear connector is proposed, which improves the performance of shear pocket connector. The features of the new type shear connector are the epoxy mortar in reserved holes in concrete plate and epoxy mortar layer between the precast concrete plate and steel beam. And experimental work on the push-out tests was done, mainly to evaluate the structural behavior for different reserved hole diameters. Based on the failure mode and load–slip curve obtained from the push-out test, the force transmission mechanism of the new shear connector was discussed. In addition, the shear strength and the shear stiffness of the new connector were estimated. As the existence of the epoxy mortar layer, the failure mode of the stud shear connector has changed, and its shear strength and shear stiffness are also greater than those of shear pocket connector. Meanwhile, the shear strength and shear stiffness increase with diameter of the reserved holes. Finally, referring to widely used standards and the previous formula for the shear pocket connector, a formula for calculating the shear strength of the new type shear connector is proposed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AASHTO LRFD (2012) Bridge design specifications. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC
Badie S, Girgis A, Tadros M, Sriboonma K (2011) Full-scale testing for composite slab/beam systems made with extended stud spacing. J Bridg Eng 16(5):653–661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000215
Berthet JF, Yurtdas I, Delmas Y, Li A (2011) Evaluation of the adhesion resistance between steel and concrete by push out test. Int J Adhes Adhes 31:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.11.004
Bouazaoui L, Perrenot G, Delmas Y, Li A (2007) Experimental study of bonded steel concrete composite structures. J Constr Steel Res 63:1268–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.11.002
DL/T 5193-2004 (2004) Technical code of epoxy resin mortar. National Development and Reform Commission, Beijing, China (in Chinese)
EN 1994-1-1. Eurocode 4 (2004) Design of composite steel and concrete structure, part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization
Fang Z, Jiang H, Xiao J, Dong X, Shao T (2021) Shear performance of UHPC-filled pocket connection between precast UHPC girders and full-depth precast concrete slabs. Structures 29:328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.038
GB 50017-2017 (2017) Code for design of steel structures. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Beijing, China
GB/T 228.1-2010 (2010) Metallic materials—Tensile testing—Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, Beijing, China
GB/T 8923-1988 (1988) Rust grades and preparation grades of steel surfaces before application of paints and related products. China Standard Press, Beijing, China (in Chinese)
Hatami A (2014) Design of shear connectors for precast concrete decks in concrete girder bridges. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Issa MA, Yousif AA, Issa MA (1995) Construction procedures for rapid replacement of deteriorated bridge decks. Concr Int 17(2):49–52
Issa MA, Yousif AA, Issa MA (2000) Experimental behavior of full-depth precast concrete panels for bridge rehabilitation. Struct J 97(3):397–407
Issa MM, SalasJS SHI, Alrousan RZ (2006) Composite behavior of prefabricated full-depth precast concrete panels installed on precast prestressed girders. PCI J 51(5):132–145
Issa MA, Yousif AA, Issa MA (1995) Structural behavior of full depth precast prestressed concrete bridge deck replacement. Final Report, Illinois Department of Transportation
JTG 3362-2018 (2018) Specifications for design of highway reinforced concrete and pre-stressed concrete bridges and culverts. People’s Communications Publishing House Co., Ltd., Beijing, China
Jurkiewiez B, Meaud C, Michel L (2011) Nonlinear behaviour of steel–concrete epoxy bonded composite beams. J Constr Steel Res 67(3):389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.10.002
Jurkiewiez B, Meaud C, Ferrier E (2014) Non-linear models for steel–concrete epoxy bonded beams. J Constr Steel Res 100:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.005
Kim JH, Shim CS, Matsui S (2002) The effect of bedding layer on the strength of shear connection in full-depth precast deck. Eng J 39(3):127–135
Larbi AS, Ferrier E, Jurkiewiez B, Hamelin P (2007) Static behavior of steel concrete beam connected by bonding. Eng Struct 29(6):1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.015
Lu S, Zhao W, Han P, Hang Z (2019) Mechanical behavior of hybrid connectors for rapid-assembling steel-concrete composite beams. Civ Eng J 5(10):2081–2092. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091395
Luo Y, Li A, Kang Z (2012) Parametric study of bonded steel-concrete composite beams by using finite element analysis. Eng Struct 34:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.036
Maher TK (1997) Rapid replacement of bridge decks. Final report, 12–41, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Transportation Research Board
Shariati M, Sulong NR, Shariati A, Kueh ABH (2016) Comparative performance of channel and angle shear connectors in high strength concrete composites: an experimental study. Constr Build Mater 120:382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.10
Shariati M, Sulong NR, Suhatril M, ShariatiA, Khanouki MA, Sinaei H (2013) Comparison of behaviour between channel and angle shear connectors under monotonic and fully reversed cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 38:582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.050
Shim CS, Kim JH, Chang SP, Chung CH (2000) The behavior of shear connections in a composite beam with a full-depth precast slab. Struct Build 140(1):101–110. https://doi.org/10.1680/istbu.2000.32181
Shim CS, Lee PG, Yoon TY (2004) Static behavior of large stud shear connectors. Eng Struct 26(12):1853–1860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cngstruct.2004.07.011
Su QT, Liu YQ, Zeng MG (2008) Experimental study on mechanical properties of stud shear connectors for cable pylon of Su Tong Bridge. J Tongji Univ 36(7): 916–920
Sullivan SR, Wollmann CLR, Swenty MK (2011) Composite behavior of precast concrete bridge deck-panel systems. PCI J 56(3):43–59. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.06012011.43.59
Tawadrous R, Morcous G (2020) Design of shear pocket connection in full-depth precast concrete deck systems. Eng Struct 179:367–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.003
Toghroli A, Mohammadhassani M, Suhatril M, Shariati M, Ibrahim Z (2014) Prediction of shear capacity of channel shear connectors using the ANFIS model. Steel Compos Struct 17(5): 623–639. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.5.623
Wang W, Yi Z, Tian B, Zhang Y, Lu S (2021) Nonlinear finite element analysis of PBL shear connectors in hybrid structures. Structures 33:4642–4654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.047
Yang Y, Chen Y (2018) Experimental study on mechanical behavior of PBL shear connectors. J Bridg Eng 23(9):04018062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001274
Yousif AA (1995) Field performance of full depth precast concrete panels in bridge deck reconstruction. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
Zhan Y, Duan M, Zhang L, Liu C, Li Z, Zhao R (2021) Study on the shear performance of adhesive shear connectors in push-out tests. Structures 32:2103–2117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.109
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No. 2021008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, S., Zhao, W. & Guo, Z. Experimental Study of the New Type Stud Shear Connector for Assembled Steel–Concrete Beams. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46, 3119–3130 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00791-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00791-9