Abstract
The crashes of educational institutions buses have become common and posing a serious risk to students’ lives in Oman. There are many reasons for the increasing bus crashes including driver’s risk-taking behavior and non-compliance with traffic laws. This study aims to assess the safety aspects of the University of Nizwa bus service considering the perceptions of its students. A questionnaire was designed, and the student’s perceptions were asked on driving attitudes, styles and norms, and some other selected attributes of bus service safety. The total collected samples were 350. Almost 30% of the students have experienced a crash while traveling on the bus. Student’s perceptions showed that speeding and cell phone usage are the main reasons for the bus crashes as drivers frequently use cell phone and exceed the speed limits. Some students believed that the age and experience of the drivers influence their driving behavior and crash propensity. Bus service reliability and comfort, driver’s driving habits, norms, and compliance with traffic signs are underlying factors of student’s intentions to use the bus service in the future. Strict enforcement related to the use of cell phone and exceeding the speed limits and proper compliance of drivers with traffic rules would help in improving the safety of bus service. The educational institutions should develop a clear safety policy regarding the hiring of drivers for buses and monitoring of their behavior during driving. There is also a need to initiate special training and awareness programs for the bus drivers of educational institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adell E, Várhelyi A, Fontana MD (2011) The effects of a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance – a real-life field study. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 19:145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.04.006
Af Wåhlberg AE (2006) Driver celeration behavior and the prediction of traffic accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 12:281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2006.11076690
Af Wåhlberg AE (2007) Effects of passengers on bus driver celeration behavior and incident prediction. J Safety Res 38:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.10.002
Agyeman S, Cheng L (2020) Analysis of barriers to perceived service quality in Ghana: Students’ perspectives on bus mobility attributes. Transp Policy 99:63–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.015
Al-Hashmi WY, Al-Shaqsi AS, Javid MA (2018) Factors Causing School Bus Accidents in Oman. In: Proceedings of 8th National Symposium on Engineering Final Year Projects. College of Engineering and Architecture, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Oman
Al-Khayyat MA, Al-rahbi AYH, Nasser H et al (2018) Assessment of parking demand & supply: a case of University Of Nizwa. In: 8th National Symposium on Engineering Final Year Projects. Nizwa, Oman, pp 1–4
Al-Reesi H, Al-Maniri A (2014) Road traffic injuries among young drivers in Oman. Oman Med J 29:313
Al Azri M, Al Reesi H, Al-Adawi S et al (2017) Personality of young drivers in Oman: relationship to risky driving behaviors and crash involvement among Sultan Qaboos University students. Traffic Inj Prev 18:150–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1235269
Al Reesi H, Al Maniri A, Plankermann K et al (2013) Risky driving behavior among university students and staff in the Sultanate of Oman. Accid Anal Prev 58:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.021
Al Reesi H, Freeman J, Davey J et al (2018) Measuring risky driving behaviours among young drivers: development of a scale for the Oman setting. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 55:78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.030
Alonso F, Esteban C, Useche S, Colomer N (2018) Effect of road safety education on road risky behaviors of Spanish children and adolescents: findings from a national study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122828
Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bentler PM, Chou CP (1987) Practical issues in structural modeling. Social Methods Res 16:78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
Bianchi A, Summala H (2004) The “genetics” of driving behavior: parents’ driving style predicts their children’s driving style. Accid Anal Prev 36:655–659
Bon De Sousa T, Santos C, Mateus C et al (2016) Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver’s attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: are they related? Traffic Inj Prev 17:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591
Boomsma A, Hoogland JJ (2001) The Robustness of LISREL Modeling Revisited. In: Structural equation models: present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog, 1st edn. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, pp 139–168
D’Souza KA, Maheshwari SK (2012) Improving performance of public transit buses by minimizing driver distraction. In: WIT transactions on the built environment. pp 281–293
De Oña J, De Oña R, Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2013) Perceived service quality in bus transit service: a structural equation approach. Transp Policy 29:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.001
Donoughe K, Katz B (2015) Evaluation of fatal school bus-related crashes and near-term crash mitigation strategies. IATSS Res 38:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2014.12.003
Eboli L, Mazzulla G, Pungillo G (2017) How drivers’ characteristics can affect driving style. Transp Res Procedia 27:945–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.024
Edelstein JL (2020) Seatbelts on school buses reduce injury—HG.org. In: HG.org Leg. Resour. https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/seatbelts-on-school-buses-reduce-injury-35289. Accessed 26 Sep 2020
Fadilah SI, Rahman A, Shariff M (2014) A time gap interval for safe following distance (TGFD) in avoiding car collision in Wireless Vehicular Networks (VANET) Environment. In: Fifth international conference on intelligent systems, modelling, and simulation, pp 683–689
Febres JD, García-Herrero S, Herrera S et al (2020) Influence of seat-belt use on the severity of injury in traffic accidents. Eur Transp Res Rev 12:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-0401-5
Feng S, Li Z, Ci Y, Zhang G (2016) Risk factors affecting fatal bus accident severity: their impact on different types of bus drivers. Accid Anal Prev 86:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.025
Field A (2013) Discovering Statistics using SPSS, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, London
Gie Yong A, Pearce S (2013) A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: focusing on exploratory factor analysis. In: Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, pp 79–94
Golob TF (2001) Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 35:495–514
Golob TF (2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp Res Part B Methodol 37:1–25
Greaves SP, Ellison AB (2011) Personality, risk aversion, and speeding: an empirical investigation. Accid Anal Prev 43:1828–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.018
Griffin R, Huisingh C, McGwin G (2014) Prevalence of and factors associated with distraction among public transit bus drivers. Traffic Inj Prev 15:720–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2013.867482
Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF (1988) Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265
Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6:53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D79B73
Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu X, Zhao L, Wang W (2015) Impact of perceptions of bus service performance on mode choice preference. Adv Mech Eng 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015573826
Issa Y (2016) Effect of driver’s personal characteristics on traffic accidents in Tabuk city in Saudi Arabia. J Transp Lit 10:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-1031.jtl.v10n3a5
Javid MA, Al-Hashimi AR (2020) Significance of attitudes, passion, and cultural factors in driver’s speeding behavior in Oman: application of theory of planned behavior. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 27:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2019.1695632
Javid MA, Al-Neama MY (2018) Identification of factors causing driver’s distraction in Oman. J Appl Eng Sci 16:153–160. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes16-16669
Javid MA, Al-Roushdi AFA (2019) Causal factors of driver’s speeding behaviour, a case study in Oman: role of norms, personality, and exposure aspects. Int J Civ Eng 17:1409–1419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00403-8
Javid MA, Hussain S, Anwaar MF (2020) Passenger’s perceptions on prospects of Qingqi Paratransit Public Transport Service in Lahore. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 44:185–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00273-z
Kim HJ, Min JY, Kim HJ, Min KB (2017) Accident risk associated with smartphone addiction: a study on university students in Korea. J Behav Addict 6:699–707. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.070
Kline RB (2005) Methodology in the social sciences. In: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd edn.
Koushki PA, Bustan MA, Kartam N (2003) Impact of safety belt use on road accident injury and injury type in Kuwait. Accid Anal Prev 35:237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00109-9
Li J, Kezheng Z, Jiangzhong G, Kang J (2012) Reasons analyzing of school bus accidents in China. Procedia Eng 45:841–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.248
Lipovac K, Đerić M, Tešić M et al (2017) Mobile phone use while driving-literary review. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 47:132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.04.015
Luo Q, Chen X, Yuan J et al (2020) Study and Simulation Analysis of Vehicle Rear-End Collision Model considering Driver Types. J Adv Transp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7878656
Ma C, Hao W, Xiang W, Yan W (2018) The impact of aggressive driving behavior on driver-injury severity at highway-rail grade crossings accidents. J Adv Transp 2018:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9841498
Machado-León JL, De Oña J, De Oña R et al (2016) Socio-economic and driving experience factors affecting drivers’ perceptions of traffic crash risk. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 37:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.010
Machin MA, Sankey KS (2008) Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accid Anal Prev 40:541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.010
Mallia L, Lazuras L, Violani C, Lucidi F (2015) Crash risk and aberrant driving behaviors among bus drivers: the role of personality and attitudes towards traffic safety. Accid Anal Prev 79:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.034
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2002) School bus safety: Crashworthiness Research. Washington D.C.
Ogundele O, Ogunlade S, Adeyanju S, Ifesanya A (2013) The impact of seat-belts in limiting the severity of injuries in patients presenting to a university hospital in the developing world. Niger Med J 54:17. https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.108888
Oliver J (2019) Quantitative assessment of driver speeding behavior using instrumented vehicles. Hilos Tensados 1:1–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Oman Observer (2019) Road accidents drop in Oman, but not casualties: Report. https://www.omanobserver.om/road-accidents-drop-in-oman-but-not-casualties-reprot/. Accessed 12 Aug 2020
Prato CG, Kaplan S (2014) Bus accident severity and passenger injury: evidence from Denmark. Eur Transp Res Rev 6:17–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-013-0107-z
PressReader (2019) Big Drop in Road Accident Deaths. https://www.pressreader.com/. Accessed 22 Sep 2020
Raykov T, Marcoulides GA (2000) A first course in structural equation modeling. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Reesi HA, Armstrong K, Edwards J et al (2015) Social influences on risky driving behaviours among young drivers in Oman. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road Safety Conference, Gold Coast, Australia, pp 1–11
Rizwan S, Ejaz H, Iqbal F et al (2018) Severity and causes of accidents on Motorway M-1 and M-2. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J 68:1023–1027
Rohani MM, Buhari R, Hussein T, Malaysia O (2013) Bus driver: factors that influences behaviour. In: 9th International conference of geotechnical and transportation engineering (GEOTROPIKA) and 1st international conference on construction and building engineering (ICONBUILD). Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Salmon PM, Young KL, Regan MA (2011) Distraction “on the buses”: a novel framework of ergonomics methods for identifying sources and effects of bus driver distraction. Appl Ergon 42:602–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.07.007
Samuels P (2017) Advice on exploratory factor analysis. Cent Acad Success, Birmingham City Univ 1–7. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5013.9766
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res 8:23–74
Schreiber JB, Stage FK, King J et al (2006) Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 99:323–338
Scott-Parker BJ (2012) A comprehensive investigation of the risky driving behaviour of young novice drivers. Queensland University of Technology
Shaaban K, Kim I (2016) The influence of bus service satisfaction on university students’ mode choice. J Adv Transp 50:935–948. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1383
Shope JT (2006) Influences on youthful driving behavior and their potential for guiding interventions to reduce crashes. Inj Prev 12:i9
Sims BK (2014) Driving and thriving: school bus drivers and the behavior management strategies they use. East Tennessee State University
Taber KS (2017) The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
United Educators (2014) School Buses and the Danger of Driver Distraction. Public Sch. News 1–6
Vahedi J, Mohaymany AS, Tabibi Z, Mehdizadeh M (2018) Aberrant driving behaviour, risk involvement, and their related factors among taxi drivers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081626
Warner HW, Åberg L (2006) Drivers’ decision to speed: a study inspired by the theory of planned behavior. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 9:427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.03.004
World Health Organization (2020) Road traffic injuries. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries. Accessed 8 Jul 2020
World Health Organization (2018) Global status report on road safety. Geneva
Zhang W, Hu Z, Feng Z et al (2018) Investigating factors influencing drivers’ speed selection behavior under reduced visibility conditions. Traffic Inj Prev 19:488–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1453134
Zhang Z, Ma T, Ji N et al (2019) An assessment of the relationship between driving skills and driving behaviors among Chinese bus drivers. Adv Mech Eng 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018824916
Zhang Z, Zhang X, Ji N et al (2019) A study on the differences in driving skills of Chinese bus and taxi drivers. J Adv Transp 2019:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8675318
Acknowledgement
This research work was conducted at University of Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman. The authors are thankful to all the people who supported this research work and helped in conducting the questionnaire survey.
Funding
There is no funding source associated with this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Javid, M.A., Al-Hashmi, W.Y. & Al-Shaqsi, A.S. Exploring the Student’s Perceptions on Safety Aspects of the University of Nizwa Bus Service in Oman. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 45, 227–239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00545-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-020-00545-z