Skip to main content
Log in

Commuters’ Attitude Analysis of Feeder Public Transit Service: A Case Study

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Feeder public transit service (FPTS) plays a vital role in economic development for commuters’ access to the city centers. Attitude analysis of the mode or service is the process of achieving the decision to use mode or service under a set of circumstances. The commuters’ attitude of a particular mode or service affects the whole public transport system. The present study aims to analyze the attitudes of the commuters toward proposed FPTS in Maninagar to Naroda BRTS corridor of Ahmedabad city. The methodology consists of the bus stop and onboard survey using revealed and stated preferences survey data. The present study used binary logit models with explanatory variables including demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of individuals, trip/travel characteristics and feeder mode attributes. The prediction accuracy of the proposed model was 65.9%, which was greater than the proportion by chance accuracy criteria of 64.3%, indicating the model was a good fit. The findings from the study revealed that as monthly income and vehicle ownership increase, the preference for the acceptance of the proposed FPTS increases, while increasing the values of household size and travel distance will give preference to the rejection of the proposed FPTS. The observation also shows that an increase in the level of service variables such as travel time and travel cost causes the commuters to reject the proposed FPTS service so far. The findings of this research can be extremely useful to increase ridership of public transit by providing feeder service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashalatha R, Manju V, Zacharia AB (2012) Mode choice behavior of commuters in Thiruvananthapuram city. J Transp Eng 139(5):494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayaga A (2010) Multinomial logistic regression: usage and application in risk analysis. J Appl Quant Methods 5(2):288–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva ME, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M, Morikawa T (1990) Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transp Res Part A Gen 24(6):485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WG (2007) Sampling techniques. Wiley, Hoboken

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Methodol) 34:187–220

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El-Habil AM (2012) An application on multinomial logistic regression model. Pak J Stat Oper Res 8(2):271–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatima E, Kumar R (2014) Introduction of public bus transit in Indian cities. Int J Sustain Built Environ 3(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley C, Hughes A, Hultgren K, Miner B, Sorte C (2009) Allison, PD 1999. Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. Cary NC, SAS Institute Inc. Association of Official Seed Analysts. 1981. Rules for testing seeds. Journal of Seed Technology 6(2): 1–126. Bintz, JC and SW Nixon. 2001. Responses of eelgrass Zostera marina seedlings to. Function of Seed-Bank Ecology in Mid-Atlantic Semi-Annual and Perennial Zostera Marina Beds 6(2):169

  • Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX (2013) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman FS, Bhat C (2006) A self instructing course in mode choice modeling: multinomial and nested logit models. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration

  • Miskeen A, Manssour A, Mohamed Alhodairi A, Rahmat R (2013) Modeling of intercity transport mode choice behavior in Libya: a binary logit model for business trips by private car and intercity bus. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 7(1):302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J (1983) Applied linear regression models. R.D. Irwin, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wedagama DP (2009) A multinomial logit model for estimating the influence of household characteristics on motorcycle ownership: a case study in Denpasar city, Bali. J Civ Eng 29(1):2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White J (2013) Logistic regression model effectiveness: proportional chance criteria and proportional reduction in error. J Contemp Res Educ 2(1):4–10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjurali I. Balya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balya, M.I., Kumar, R. Commuters’ Attitude Analysis of Feeder Public Transit Service: A Case Study. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 43 (Suppl 1), 313–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0166-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0166-4

Keywords

Navigation