Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Study on the Behavior of Central Gusset Plates in Inverted V-Brace Frames

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steel frames comprise a great range of structures where bracings are mostly used as the seismic motion control system. One of these systems is frames with inverted V-braces. The central gusset plate of such systems is one of the most important components in the seismic design of structures. Using a suitable gusset plate can increase ductility and strength of the frame extensively. In this paper, a numerical model of central connection of a frame containing inverted V-brace is used. The brace is buckling restrained and is modeled with the finite element software. The results of pushover analysis of this model are compared with experimental results. In this article, the effects of the gusset plate dimensions on buckling capacity and ductility have been investigated and the optimum ratio of width to thickness is obtained. One of the cases controlled is brace position relative to the free bending line, and effects on the frame strength and ductility have been checked. In addition, welded and bolted connections have been compared. The results show that, to gain the best strength and ductility, braces should be extended to twice the thickness of the gusset plate after the free bending line. In addition, welded connections have a better performance than bolted ones with regard to ductility and strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abradford M, Ahari M (1995) Buckling of plates with different end conditions using the finite strip method. J Comput Struct 56(1):75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AISC (2011) Steel construction manual, 14th edn. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Astaneh-asl A (1998) Seismic behavior and design of gusset plates. Structural Steel Educational Council

  • Cheng JR, Yam MC, Hu SZ (1994) Elastic buckling strength of gusset plate connections. ASCE J Struct Eng 120(2):538–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou C-C, Chen P-J (2009) Compressive behavior of central gusset plate connections for a buckling-restrained braced frame. J Constr Steel Res 65:1138–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou CC, Liu JH (2012) Frame and brace action forces on steel corner gusset plate connections in buckling-restrained braced frames. Earthq Spectra 28(2):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou CC, Liu JH, Pham DH (2012) Steel buckling restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41(7):1137–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esmaeili H, Kheyroddin A, Naderpour H (2013) Seismic behavior of steel moment resisting frames associated with RC shear walls. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 37(C):395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang C, Yam MC, Cheng JR, Zhang Y (2015) Compressive strength and behaviour of gusset plate connections with single-sided splice members. J Constr Steel Res 106:166–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadianfard MA, Khakzad AR (2016) Inelastic buckling and post-buckling behavior of gusset plate connections. J Steel Compos Struct 22(2):411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izadifard RA, Maheri MR (2010) Ductility effects on the behaviour of steel structures under blast loading. Iran J Sci Technol 34(B1):49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E, Bertro VV (1994) Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design. Earthq Spectra 10(2):357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park R, Priestley MJN (1987) Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. ACI Struct J 84(1):61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov EP (1986) On California structural steel seismic design. Earthq Spectra 2(4):703–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng N, Yam CH, Iu VP (2002) Analytical investigation and the design of the compressive strength steel gusset plate connections. J Constr Steel Res 58:1473–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton WA (1984) Bracing connection for heavy construction. AISC Eng J 21(3):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KC, Hsiao BC, Wang KJ, Weng YT, Lin KC (2008) Pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale CFT/BRB frame—part I: specimen design, experiment and analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37:1081–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore RE (1952) Experimental investigation of stresses in gusset plate. Engineering Experiment Station, University of Tennessee, Bulletin No. 16

  • Williams GC, Richard RM (1986) Steel connection design based on inelastic finite element analysis. Report of Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, the University of Arizona

  • Zhang W, Huang M, Zhang Y, Sun Y (2011) Cyclic behavior studies on I-section inverted V-braces and their plate connections. J Constr Steel Res 67(3):407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ali Hadianfard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hadianfard, M.A., Gholami, M. & Hashemi, A. Numerical Study on the Behavior of Central Gusset Plates in Inverted V-Brace Frames. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 41, 433–439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-017-0073-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-017-0073-0

Keywords

Navigation