Seismic Response Reduction in Liquid Storage Tanks by Simple Smart Base Isolation Systems

Research Paper
  • 125 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a nonlinear autonomous algorithm is proposed to control the variable dampers and to provide semi-active control of a liquid storage tank by taking advantage of similarity to friction models and avoiding demerits. Friction mechanism in sliding bearings shows rigid-perfectly plastic behavior with limited damping force. However, transition of vibrations of high frequencies and appearance of residual displacements after the excitation are the drawbacks of such systems. Considering a performance-based seismic design approach, the proposed damping mechanism is capable of controlling the system in a two-level seismic design criterion. The performance and applicability of both the proposed algorithm and a variable oil damper under this command were experimentally verified in previous research. The effect of passive and semi-active seismic control of a liquid storage tank on the response of the structure and sloshing liquid is analytically investigated. Three base isolation systems with passive viscous or sliding dampers are applied and compared with three hybrid semi-active base isolation systems. Pseudo-negative stiffness, skyhook and a proposed control strategy by author are utilized as the control systems. A lumped mass–spring model is employed to represent the dynamic behavior of the tank and the contained liquid. The structural response and sloshing are calculated and compared. It is shown that the smart base isolation system is effective in reduction in the base shear and displacement of the structure. The sloshing response observed through the displacement and kinetic energy of the convective mass is reduced by the hybrid control systems.

Keywords

Base isolation Semi-active control Sliding bearings Liquid storage tanks 

References

  1. Chalhoub MS, Kelly JM (1988) Theoretical and experimental studies of cylindrical water tanks in base isolated structures, report to the national science foundation, report no. UBC/EERC-88/07Google Scholar
  2. Hara F, Saito O (1998) Active control for earthquake-induced sloshing of a liquid contained in a circular tank. In: Proceeding of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 5. Aug 2–9, 1998, Tokyo-KyotoGoogle Scholar
  3. Iemura H, Pradono MH (2003) Application of pseudo negative stiffness control to the benchmark cable-stayed bridges. J Struct Control 10(3–4) (Special issue on the Benchmark Control Problems for Cable-Stayed Bridges)Google Scholar
  4. Iemura H, Igarashi A, Nakata N (2002) Full scale verification of tests of semi-active control of structures using variable joint damper system. In: Proceeding of the third world conference on structural control, Como. Apr 7–11, 2002, pp 175–180Google Scholar
  5. Iemura H, Igarashi A, Harris PM, Kalantari A (2006) Negative stiffness friction damping for seismically isolated structures. Struct Control Health Monit 13(2–3):775–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karnopp D, Crosby MJ, Harwood RA (1974) Vibration control using semi-active force generators. J Eng Ind 96(2):619–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kelly TE, Mayes RL (1989) Seismic isolation of storage tanks, Seismic engineering: research and practice, structural congress, USA, pp 408–417Google Scholar
  8. Kim NS, Lee DG (1995) Pseudo-dynamic test for evaluation of seismic performance of base-isolated liquid storage tanks. Eng Struct 17(3):198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamb SH (1993) Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Malhotra P (1997a) Method for seismic base isolation of liquid storage tanks. J Struct Eng 123(1):113–116Google Scholar
  11. Malhotra P (1997b) New method for seismic isolation of liquid storage tanks. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 26:839–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malhotra P (1998) Seismic strengthening of liquid storage tanks with energy dissipating anchors. J Struct Eng 124(4):405–414Google Scholar
  13. Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou MC (1991) 3D basis, nonlinear dynamic analysis of three-dimensional base isolation structures: part 2, technical report, NCEER-91-0005Google Scholar
  14. Nagarajaiah S, Narasimhan S, Johnson E (2008) Structural control benchmark problem: phase II—nonlinear smart base-isolated building subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Struct Control Health Monit 15(5):653–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reconnaissance report on the August 26 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake, Tokyo University. http://www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/hirata/tokati/mokuji040604.htm
  16. Shrimali MK, Jangid RS (2002a) Non-linear seismic response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks to bi-directional excitation. Nucl Eng Design 217:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shrimali MK, Jangid RS (2002b) A comparative study of performance of various isolation systems for liquid storage tanks. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 2(4):573–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sogabe K, Ogawa H, Kobayashi T (1998) Basic study on active suppression method of sloshing of liquid in tanks during earthquake by air injection. In: Proceeding of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 5. Aug 2–9, 1998, Tokyo-KyotoGoogle Scholar
  19. Tadao K, Yozo G, Nakamura T, Okada H (1998) Fundamental study on feedback control system regarding sloshing in storage tank. In: Proceeding of ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol 5. Aug 2–9, 1998, Tokyo-KyotoGoogle Scholar
  20. Tajirian FF (1998) Base isolation design for civil components and civil Structures. In: Proceedings, structural engineers world congress, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. Toyooka A (2003) Development of the inertia force driven Hybrid loading system and pseudo-negative stiffness control method for a MR damper. Ph.D Dissertation, Kyoto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Veletsos AS, Yang JY (1976) Dynamics of fixed-base liquid storage tanks. In: Proceeding of US-Japan seminar on lifeline systems. Nov 1976, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang YP, Teng MC, Chung KW (2001) Seismic isolation of rigid cylindrical tanks using friction pendulum bearing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(7):1083–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zayas VA, Low SS (1995) Application of seismic isolation to industrial tanks. In: Proceedings, earthquake protection systems, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and SeismologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations