Abstract
Consolidation parameters, permeability and volume compressibility, are the classic and influential parameters in pore water pressure development and the settlement behavior of natural alluvial deposits. Permeability plays a major role in excess pore water pressure dissipation, while the volume compressibility coefficient determines the amount of consolidation settlement. The present paper focuses on an uncoupled consolidation formulation in order to emphasize the role of spatial variation of consolidation parameters and their influence on pore water pressure dissipation rate. Deterministic heterogeneity of permeability and volume compressibility was chosen to model the inherent variability of affecting parameters by considering a depth-decreasing trend for these parameters. A numerical implicit backward Euler scheme was adopted to solve the heterogeneous consolidation equation. The rate of change for permeability and volume compressibility with depth was studied to see their effects on the consolidation rate. It was found that the inherent variability of consolidation parameters should not be neglected as it may introduce an overestimation in the average degree of consolidation estimation, especially for highly variable alluvial deposits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Badaoui MH, Slimani A, Nour A, Berrah MK (2007) Consolidation statistics investigation via thin layer method analysis. Transp Porous Media 67(1):69–91
Davis EH, Raymond GP (1965) A non-linear theory of consolidation. Geotechnique 15(2):161–173
Duncan JM (1993) Limitations of conventional analysis of consolidation settlement. J Geotech Eng 119(9):1333–1359
Freeze RA (1977) Probabilistic one-dimensional consolidation. J Geotech Eng Div 103:725–741
Gilani PP, Chenari RJ (2011a) Stochastic vs. deterministic analysis of consolidation problem in natural alluvial deposits. In: Georisk 201:1 Geotechnical risk assessment and management, ASCE, pp 271–278
Gilani PP, Chenari RJ (2011b) Discussion of “probabilistic analysis of coupled soil consolidation” by Jinsong Huang, DV Griffiths, and Gordon A. Fenton. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 137(9):857–858
Hong Han Ping (1992) One-dimensional consolidation with uncertain properties. Can Geotech J 29(1):161–165
Huang J, Griffiths DV (2010) One-dimensional consolidation theories for layered soil and coupled and uncoupled solutions by the finite-element method. Geotechnique 60(9):709–713
Huang J, Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2010) Probabilistic analysis of coupled soil consolidation. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(3):417–430
Lee PKK, Xie KH, Cheung YK (1992) A study on one-dimensional consolidation of layered systems. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 16(11):815–831
Li BH, Xie KH, Ying HW, Zeng GX (1999) Semi-analytical solution of 1-D nonlinear consolidation considering the initial effective stress distribution. Chin J Civil Eng 32(6):47–52 (in Chinese)
Pyrah IC (1996) One-dimensional consolidation of layered soils. Geotechnique 46(3):555–560
Schiffman RL, Gibson RE (1964) Consolidation of non-homogeneous clay layers. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 4043:1–30
Xie KH, Xie XY, Jiang Wen (2002) A study on one-dimensional nonlinear consolidation of double-layered soil. Comput Geotech 29(2):151–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamshidi Chenari, R., Seyed Noori, N. Uncoupled Consolidation Analysis of Clay Deposits with Linearly Varying Characteristics with Depth. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 41, 49–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0038-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-016-0038-8