Skip to main content

Influence of Demographic and Health Survey Point Displacements on Point-in-Polygon Analyses

Abstract

We use Demographic and Health Survey data to evaluate the impact of random spatial displacements on analyses that involve assigning covariate values from ancillary areal and point feature data. We introduce a method to determine the maximum probability covariate (MPC), and compare this to the naive covariate (NC) selection method with respect to obtaining the true covariate of interest. The MPC selection method outperforms the NC selection method by increasing the probability that the correct covariate is chosen. Proposed guidelines also address how characteristics of ancillary areal and point features contribute to uncertainty in covariate assignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Armstrong, M. P., Rushton, G., & Zimmerman, D. L. (1999). Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentiality. Statistics in medicine, 18(5), 497–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balk, D., Pullum, T., Storeygard, A., Greenwell, F., & Neuman, M. (2004). A spatial analysis of childhood mortality in West Africa. Population, Space and Place, 10(3), 175–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgert, C. R., Colston, J., Roy, T., & Zachary, B. (2013). Geographic displacement procedure and georeferenced data release policy for the Demographic and Health Surveys. DHS Spatial Analysis Report (7th ed.). Calverton: ICF International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., & Stefanski, L. A. (1990). Approximate quasi-likelihood estimation in models with surrogate predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emwanu, T., Okwi, P. O., Hoogeveen, J. G., Kristjanson, P., & Henninger, N. (2007). Nature, distribution and evolution of poverty and inequality in Uganda. Technical report, Uganda Bureau of Statistics and the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).

  • Feldacker, C., Emch, M., & Ennett, S. (2010). The who and where of HIV in rural Malawi: Exploring the effects of person and place on individual HIV status. Health and Place, 16(5), 996–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina, J. P., Emch, M., Muwonga, J., Mwandagalirwa, K., Edidi, S. B., Mama, N., et al. (2010). Spatial and socio-behavioral patterns of HIV prevalence in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Social Science and Medicine, 71(8), 1428–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, S., Keyzer, M. A., Arouna, A., & Sonneveld, B. G. (2008). Addressing diarrhea prevalence in the West African Middle Belt: Social and geographic dimensions in a case study for Benin. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simler, K. R. (2006). Nutrition mapping in Tanzania: An exploratory analysis. Washington, DC: International food policy research institute (IFPRI). Food consumption and nutrition division (FCND).

  • Strickland, M. J., Siffel, C., Gardner, B. R., Berzen, A. K., & Correa, A. (2007). Quantifying geocode location error using gis methods. Environ Health, 6(10), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) and ICF International (2012). Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2011 [Datasets]. UGIR60FL and UGGE61FL Kampala, Uganda: UBOS and Calverton, Maryland: ICF International [Producers]. ICF International [Distributor].

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2009). Uganda health facilities.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by Grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007018, P30ES010126) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the MEASURE DHS project (Contract No. GPO-C-00-08-00008-00).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua L. Warren.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40980_2015_15_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

{\bf Additional file 1 --- Appendix A} Appendix A is a .pdf file which shows how the maximum probability covariate can be determined for both problem types given only the displaced DHS cluster location. 121KB

40980_2015_15_MOESM2_ESM.txt

{\bf Additional file 2 --- Appendix B} Appendix B is a .txt file containing R code which calculates the probability of each observed region for a given displaced DHS cluster location, allowing the researcher to determine the maximum probability covariate. 15.8KB

40980_2015_15_MOESM3_ESM.txt

{\bf Additional file 3 --- Appendix C} Appendix C is a .txt file containing R code which calculates the probability of each possible point resource count within $v$ km of the true DHS cluster location for a given displaced DHS cluster location and value of $v$, allowing the researcher to determine the maximum probability covariate. 13.0KB

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warren, J.L., Perez-Heydrich, C., Burgert, C.R. et al. Influence of Demographic and Health Survey Point Displacements on Point-in-Polygon Analyses. Spat Demogr 4, 117–133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0015-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-015-0015-z

Keywords

  • Covariate error
  • Maximum probability covariate
  • Spatial uncertainty