Biological degradation of toluene by indigenous bacteria Acinetobacter junii CH005 isolated from petroleum contaminated sites in India
- 245 Downloads
The bacterium Acinetobacter junii was isolated from petroleum-contaminated site in India and tested for its efficiency in degradation of toluene under aerobic condition. Within pH range 4–9, the optimum pH for toluene biodegradation was found to be 7.5. With increase in time, there was enhancement in degradation of toluene. Pure culture of Acinetobacter junii was able to degrade 69, 73 and 80% of 150, 100, and 50 ppm toluene, respectively, within 72 h at 37 °C. Simultaneous growth and degradation of toluene by the bacterium indicated the utilization of toluene as carbon source. After 72 h of treatment, toluene biodegradation was nearly stable. Scanning electron microscopic characterization of bacterial cells treated with toluene revealed the changes in surface morphology. Some of the cylindrical cells of bacterium got transformed into ovoid and spherical shape to escape the toluene toxicity. Degradation intermediates were identified by gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy. The major intermediate compounds identified after toluene degradation by bacteria were 1-isopropenyl-4-methyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene; 1,3-Cyclohexadiene; 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl); 4-methoxycarbonyl-4-butanolide; and vinyl (2E,4E)-2,4-hexadienoate, which are less-toxic in nature. The degradation of toluene into non-toxic intermediate compounds as well as the growth in the presence of toluene presents the suitability of Acinetobacter junii in biofiltration of toluene-containing petroleum waste.
KeywordsAcinetobacter junii Biodegaration Mass spectroscopy Petroleum waste Phylogenetic relationship Toluene
Authors are thankful to University Grants Commission (UGC) and Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, for providing research fellowships.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Atlas RM (1985) Effects of hydrocarbons on microorganisms and petroleum biodegradation in arctic ecosystems. Petroleum Effects in the Arctic Environment 63–100Google Scholar
- Dilly O, Nii-Annang S, Franke G, Fischer T, Buegger F, Zyakun A (2011) Resilience of microbial respiration, respiratory quotient and stable isotope characteristics to soil hydrocarbon addition. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1809–1812Google Scholar
- Floodgate GD (1984) The fate of petroleum in marine ecosystems in Petroleum. In: Atlas RM (ed) Petroleum microbiology. Macmillion, New York, pp 355–398Google Scholar
- Jones D, Head I, Gray N, Adams J, Rowan A, Aitken C, Bennett B (2007) Crude-oil biodegradation via methanogenesis in subsurface petroleum reservoirs Nat 451(7175):176–180Google Scholar
- Lee EH, Ryu HW, Cho KS (2009) Removal of benzene and toluene in polyurethane biofilter immobilizedwith Rhodococcus sp. EH831 under transient loading. BioresTechnol 100:5656–5663Google Scholar
- Rahul, Mathur AK, Balomajumder C (2013) Performance evaluation and model analysis of BTEX contaminated air in corn-cob biofilter system. BioresTechnol 133:166–174Google Scholar
- Robledo-Ortíz JR, Ramírez-Arreola DE, Pérez-Fonseca AA, Gómez C, González-Reynoso O, Ramos-Quirarte J, González-Núñez R (2011) Benzene, toluene, and o-xylene degradation by free and immobilized P. putida F1 of postconsumer agave-fiber/polymer foamed composites. Int Biodeter Biodegrad 65(3):539–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406–425Google Scholar
- Singh R, Celin SM (2010) Biodegradation of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene) compounds by bacterial strain under aerobic conditions. J Ecobiotechnol 2(4):27–32Google Scholar
- Taha M, Shahsavari E, Aburto-Medina A, Foda MF, Clarke B, Roddick F, Ball AS (2017) Bioremediation of biosolids with Phanerochaete chrysosporium culture filtrates enhances the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Appl Soil Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.11.002 Google Scholar