Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficient utilization of remelt strategy for improving relative density and surface integrity to eliminate necessity of performing post-processing of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective Laser Melting (SLM) is an advanced additive manufacturing method for producing complex metal components. However, post-processing steps are often needed due to the nature of the process. These steps include sandblasting to address high surface roughness and heat treatment to address unintended porosity, microstructural heterogeneity, and hardness fluctuations. These post-processing steps increase costs and production time. Remelting is an alternative method that involves scanning layers without powder recoating, presenting its challenges. In this study, we investigate the effects of remelting parameters and scanning strategies on the surface roughness, relative density, and microstructure of SS316L steel parts manufactured using SLM. The goal is to design an optimal scanning strategy to eliminate the need for post-processing, saving time and reducing costs. The process parameters include the remelting of layers, scan line spacing, and relative rotation angle between two layers. Based on the experimental design using a full factorial approach, 27 samples were printed, with each parameter examined at three levels. The samples were then measured for surface roughness using laser profilometry and relative density using Micro-CT technology. The results were compared with samples subjected to post-processing steps such as sandblasting and heat treatment. The remelting strategy achieved a relative density of 99.12%; moreover, Micro-computed tomography analysis further revealed that the remelting process not only reduced porosity but also led to a notable enhancement in pore geometry, transitioning from crack-like and lack of fusion defects to smaller spherical pores. In terms of microstructure, a more uniform structure and higher hardness between 202 and 207 Vickers were achieved. The remelting strategy was able to reduce the surface roughness within the range of 7 µm. Some challenges posed by remelting, such as compatibility with other parameters, the significantly longer time required for remelting of all layers, and overmelt, were examined and addressed in the discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Hatami S et al (2020) Fatigue strength of 316 L stainless steel manufactured by selective laser melting. J Mater Eng Perform 29(5):3183–3194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Enneti RK, Morgan R, Atre SV (2018) Effect of process parameters on the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of tungsten. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 71:315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang X, Gong X, Chou K (2016) Review on powder-bed laser additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 231(11):1890–1903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Özakinci M, Ünal R (2023) the effect of scanning strategy on mechanical properties and delamination during brake caliper manufacturing with selective laser melting (SLM). J Polytech. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1214999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kluczynski J et al (2020) Comparison of different heat treatment processes of selective laser melted steel based on analysis of mechanical properties. Materials 13:17

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nie H et al (2024) A new laser remelting strategy for direct energy deposition of 316L stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054231222047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Behera MP, Dougherty T, Singamneni S (2020) Selective laser melting of stainless steel and silicon nitride fibre metal matrix composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 234(12):1513–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parikh Y, Kuttolamadom M (2023) Property-graded stainless steel 316l by selective laser melting: characterization & design. J Manuf Sci Eng 145(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khodabandeh A et al (2024) Surface integrity and fatigue behavior of AISI 4340 steel after hybrid laser-ultrasonic assisted ball burnishing process. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231196266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sayadi D et al (2023) Using shot peening and burnishing to improve fatigue performance of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part L J Mater Design Applic. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207231196266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Majeed A et al (2020) Investigation of T4 and T6 heat treatment influences on relative density and porosity of AlSi10Mg alloy components manufactured by SLM. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mugwagwa Y, Matope I, Matope S (2019) Effect of process parameters on residual stresses distortions, and porosity in selective laser melting of maraging steel 300. Metals. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9101042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali H et al (2017) In-situ residual stress reduction, martensitic decomposition and mechanical properties enhancement through high temperature powder bed pre-heating of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng, A 695:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coeck S et al (2019) Prediction of lack of fusion porosity in selective laser melting based on melt pool monitoring data. Addit Manuf 25:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang C et al (2023) Characterization of porosity in lack of fusion pores in selective laser melting using the wavefunction. Mater Res Express. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/acaf24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu B et al (2022) Predicting the porosity defects in selective laser melting (SLM) by molten pool geometry. Int J Mech Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye C et al (2021) Effects of post-processing on the surface finish, porosity, residual stresses, and fatigue performance of additive manufactured metals: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 30(9):6407–6425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang S-J, Wei Z-X (2020) Influences of the scanning strategy on surface roughness in selective laser melting. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 236(14):1853–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaynak Y, Kitay O (2018) Porosity surface quality, microhardness and microstructure of selective laser melted stainless steel resulting from finish machining. J Manuf Mater Process. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp2020036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nezarati M et al (2023) The effect of the vibratory surface finishing process on surface integrity and dimensional deviation of selective laser melted parts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544054231214016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasa E, Deckers J, Kruth JP (2011) The investigation of the influence of laser re-melting on density, surface quality and microstructure of selective laser melting parts. Rapid Prototyp J 17(5):312–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shin W-S et al (2021) Heat treatment effect on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear behaviors of stainless steel 316L prepared via selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.140805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qin LY et al (2019) Microstructure homogenizations of Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured by hybrid selective laser melting and laser deposition manufacturing. Mater Sci Eng, A 759:404–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang R et al (2020) Effect of heat treatment on microstructural evolution and hardness homogeneity in laser powder bed fusion of alloy 718. Addit Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng Z et al (2022) Effect of heat treatment patterns on porosity, microstructure, and mechanical properties of selective laser melted TiB2/Al–Si–Mg composite. Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carson HC (2021) Heat treatments to improve microstructures of nickel alloys after selective laser melting

  27. Ali H, Ghadbeigi H, Mumtaz K (2018) Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng, A 712:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duan W, Wu M, Han J (2020) Effect of laser rescanning on Ti6Al4V microstructure during selective laser melting. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 235(5):763–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shao W et al (2022) Effect of hatch spacing and laser remelting on the formation of unique crystallographic texture of IN718 superalloy fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Optics Laser Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.108587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Han Q, Jiao Y (2019) Effect of heat treatment and laser surface remelting on AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102(9–12):3315–3324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu B, Li B-Q, Li Z (2019) Selective laser remelting of an additive layer manufacturing process on AlSi10Mg. Results Phys 12:982–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gustmann T et al (2018) Selective laser remelting of an additively manufactured Cu-Al-Ni-Mn shape-memory alloy. Mater Des 153:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ma Y et al (2021) Effect of rescanning with reduced interlayer times on microstructure and properties of titanium alloy via selective laser melting. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 236(6–7):648–658

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gao B et al (2022) A review of research progress in selective laser melting (SLM). Micromachines 14:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohseni M et al (2023) The effect of selective laser melting process parameters and remelting scanning strategy on relative density and surface hardness of stainless steel 316L. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089231207809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Qiu C et al (2019) Influence of laser processing strategy and remelting on surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting of a metallic material. Metall Mater Trans A 50(9):4423–4434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yasa E, Kruth JP (2011) Microstructural investigation of Selective Laser Melting 316L stainless steel parts exposed to laser re-melting. Proc Eng 19:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yu W et al (2019) Influence of re-melting on surface roughness and porosity of AlSi10Mg parts fabricated by selective laser melting. J Alloy Compd 792:574–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bakhtiarian M et al (2024) The effects of SLM process parameters on the relative density and hardness of austenitic stainless steel 316L. J Market Res 29:1616–1629

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirkoohi E et al (2018) Thermal modeling of temperature distribution in metal additive manufacturing considering effects of build layers, latent heat, and temperature-sensitivity of material properties. J Manuf Mater Process 2(3):63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Sajjad Rajabi, Alireza Khodabandeh, Mohamad Sina Sadeghi, Masood Amirshami, Ardeshir Hemasian Etefagh, Mohsen Khajehzadeh & Mohammad Reza Razfar

Authors
  1. Sajjad Rajabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Khodabandeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamad Sina Sadeghi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masood Amirshami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ardeshir Hemasian Etefagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohsen Khajehzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohammad Reza Razfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Khajehzadeh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajabi, S., Khodabandeh, A., Sadeghi, M.S. et al. Efficient utilization of remelt strategy for improving relative density and surface integrity to eliminate necessity of performing post-processing of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Prog Addit Manuf (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00624-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00624-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation