Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Helical slicing method for material extrusion-based robotic additive manufacturing

  • Full Research Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to introduce a nonplanar helical slicing method for additive manufacturing (AM) which forms a single continuous three-dimensional tool path and removes seam defects. In the proposed method, the geometry is initially sliced into planar slices. Afterwards, using two consecutive planar slices, direction vectors from the current layer to the next layer are constructed. These vectors are used to generate helical slices in-between planar slices. Repeating the process for all the planar slices results in a single helical sliced tool path. With the direction vectors, geometric improvements over the existing spiralization methods are obtained. With the helical slicing method, the seam defects which are found in the extrusion start–stop points of the planar slices are removed. The switching control of the extruder is simplified, and non-extrusion movements of the extruder are eliminated. The generated tool path is tested using a material extrusion-based robotic AM setup. Manufactured models are investigated in detail under the scanning electron microscope. The method is applicable for additively manufacturing complex freeform shell type, genus zero models with no infill and minor overhangs. This helical slicing method removes the form errors found in those of previously developed solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Des 69:65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao G, Ma G, Feng J, Xiao W (2018) Nonplanar slicing and path generation methods for robotic additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1:11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1772-9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsao C, Chang H, Liu M et al (2018) Freeform additive manufacturing by vari-directional vari-dimensional material deposition. Rapid Prototyp J 24:379–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2017-0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ulu E, Korkmaz E, Yay K et al (2015) Enhancing the structural performance of additively manufactured objects through build orientation optimization. J Mech Des 137:111410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thrimurthulu K, Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Venkata Reddy N (2004) Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2003.12.004

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Real time adaptive slicing for fused deposition modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(02)0016-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tyberg J, Bøhn JH (1998) Local adaptive slicing. Rapid Prototyp J 4:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552549810222993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 9:274–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310502185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malhotra R (2016) Automatic 3D spiral toolpath generation for single point. J Manuf Sci Eng 132:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002544

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu H, Liu Z, Fu J (2011) Spiral tool-path generation with constant scallop height for sheet metal CNC incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2996-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee E (2003) Contour offset approach to spiral toolpath generation with constant scallop height. Comput Des 35:511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00185-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao H, Chen B, Gu F et al (2016) Connected fermat spirals for layered fabrication. ACM Trans Graph 35:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897824.2925958

    Google Scholar 

  13. Singh P, Dutta D (2008) Offset slices for multidirection layered deposition. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:011011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2783217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruan J, Eiamsa-ard K, Liou FW (2005) Automatic process planning and toolpath generation of a multiaxis hybrid manufacturing system. J Manuf Process 7:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(05)70082-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruan J, Eiamsa-ard K, Liou FW (2005) Automatic multi-axis slicing based on centroidal axis computation. In: 25th computers and information in engineering conference, parts A and B, volume 3. ASME, pp 383–393

  16. Hildebrand K, Bickel B, Alexa M (2013) Orthogonal slicing for additive manufacturing. Comput Graph 37:669–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2013.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruan J, Sparks TE, Panackal A et al (2007) Automated slicing for a multiaxis metal deposition system. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:303. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2673492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Liou F (2004) Adaptive slicing for a multi-axis laser aided manufacturing process. J Mech Des 126:254. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1649966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen RJA, Trask RS (2015) An experimental demonstration of effective curved layer fused filament fabrication utilising a parallel deposition robot. Addit Manuf 8:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Llewellyn-Jones T, Allen R, Trask R (2016) Curved layer fused filament fabrication using automated toolpath generation. 3D Print Addit Manuf 3:3. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2016.0033

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lim S, Buswell RA, Valentine PJ et al (2016) Modelling curved-layered printing paths for fabricating large-scale construction components. Addit Manuf 12:216–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang B, Singamneni SB (2015) Curved layer adaptive slicing (CLAS) for fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp J 21:354–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2013-0059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hopkins PE, Holzwarth DJ (2009) Seam concealment for three-dimensional models. US Patent US8349239B2

  24. Chavel I (1995) Riemannian geometry: a modern introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manufacturing and Automation Research Center, Mechanical Engineering Department, Koc University, Sariyer, Istanbul, 34450, Turkey

    Ismail Enes Yigit & I. Lazoglu

Authors
  1. Ismail Enes Yigit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. Lazoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Lazoglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yigit, I.E., Lazoglu, I. Helical slicing method for material extrusion-based robotic additive manufacturing. Prog Addit Manuf 4, 225–232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00090-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00090-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation