Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Need for a New Approach to Soldering in High Pressure Die Casting

International Journal of Metalcasting volume 15, pages 391–397 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Soldering remains one of the most common defects in high pressure die casting (HPDC). It is most simply defined as aluminum stuck to the die surface. At ejection, the stuck aluminum gouges the casting resulting in dimensional and leaking defects. For nearly 50 years, a thermodynamics and kinetics understanding of soldering has been accepted while explicitly assuming that other mechanisms are not important. It will be shown that this thermodynamics and kinetics modeling approach cannot adequately explain three common observations in die casting foundries. First, soldering occurs much faster than the measured intermetallic growth rate based on diffusion couple experiments. Second, the alloys that are industrially observed to solder less form intermetallic phases quicker and dissolve the steel faster than alloys that solder more rapidly. Finally, the intermetallic layer is not strong enough to enable the buildup commonly observed on soldered dies. For these reasons, it is proposed that a new soldering modeling approach is required to gain a better understanding of the soldering mechanism and prevent the soldering defect in die casting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

References

  1. E.K. Holz, Trouble shooting aluminum die casting quality problems, in 7th SDCE International Die Casting Congress, vol. T72-043 (Chicago, IL, 1972)

  2. Y.-L. Chu, P. Cheng, R. Shivpuri, Investigation of the soldering problem in aluminum die casting—phenomena, mechanism and protection, National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Net Shape Manufacturing, NADCA Technical Archive, ERC/NSM-C-93-36, Sep. 1993

  3. S. Shankar, D. Apelian, Die soldering: mechanism of the interface reaction between molten aluminum alloy and tool steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 33B, 465–476 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-002-0057-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Z.W. Chen, Formation and progression of die soldering during high pressure die casting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 397(1–2), 356–369 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Y.-L. Chu, P. Cheng, R. Shivpuri, Soldering phenomenon in aluminum die casting: possible causes and cures, in North American Die Casting Congress (Cleveland, OH, Oct. 1993), pp. 361–372

  6. B. Wang, G.R. Bourne, A.L. Korenyi-Both, A.K. Monroe, S.P. Midson, M.J. Kaufman, Method to evaluate the adhesion behavior of aluminum-based alloys on various materials and coatings for lube-free die casting. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 237, 386–393 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.06.031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Yu, Y.-L. Chu, R. Shivpuri, A study of corrosion of die materials and die coatings in aluminum die casting, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T93-072 (Cleveland, OH, Oct. 1993), pp. 191–198

  8. P. Hairy, M. Richard, Reduction of sticking in pressure die casting by surface treatment, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T97-102 (1997)

  9. H. Tosa, A. Urakami, Factors influencing die casting ejection, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T72-041 (Chicago, IL, Oct. 1972)

  10. H. Wang, C.A. Loong, Experimental studies on ejection FORCES of a die cast aluminum part, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T99-052 (Cleveland, OH, 1999)

  11. Y. Zhu, D. Schwam, J.F. Wallace, S. Birceanu, Evaluation of soldering, washout and thermal fatigue resistance of advanced metal materials for aluminum die-casting dies. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 379(1–2), 420–431 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Eggeler, W. Auer, H. Kaesche, Reactions between low alloyed steel and initially pure as well as iron-saturated aluminum melts between 670 and 800-degrees-c. Z. Met. 77(4), 239–244 (1986)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Springer, A. Kostka, E.J. Payton, D. Raabe, A. Kaysser-Pyzalla, G. Eggeler, On the formation and growth of intermetallic phases during interdiffusion between low-carbon steel and aluminum alloys. Acta Mater. 59(4), 1586–1600 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Jindal, V.C. Srivastava, A. Das, R.N. Ghosh, Reactive diffusion in the roll bonded iron–aluminum system. Mater. Lett. 60(13–14), 1758–1761 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Springer, A. Kostka, J.F. dos Santos, D. Raabe, Influence of intermetallic phases and Kirkendall-porosity on the mechanical properties of joints between steel and aluminium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528(13–14), 4630–4642 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Bouayad, C. Gerometta, A. Belkebir, A. Ambari, Kinetic interactions between solid iron and molten aluminium. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 363(1–2), 53–61 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00469-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Yin, M. Zhao, Y. Liu, W. Han, Z. Li, Effect of Si on growth kinetics of intermetallic compounds during reaction between solid iron and molten aluminum. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23(2), 556–561 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62499-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Terek et al., Effects of die core treatments and surface finishes on the sticking and galling tendency of Al–Si alloy casting during ejection. Wear 356–357, 122–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.03.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Z.W. Chen, M.Z. Jahedi, J.A. Law, Metallurgical phenomena in die/casting interfacial regions during high pressure die casting of aluminum alloys, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T99-084 (Cleveland, OH, 1999)

  20. W. Kajoch, A. Fajkiel, Testing the soldering tendencies of aluminum die casting alloy, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T91-034 (Detroit, MI, 1991)

  21. S. Sumanth, A. Diran, The role of aluminum alloy chemistry and die material on die soldering, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T99-083 (Cleveland, OH, 1999)

  22. M. Makhlouf, D. Apelian, Casting characteristics of aluminum die casting alloys, DOE/ID/13716, 792701, Feb. 2002. https://doi.org/10.2172/792701

  23. A. Zovi, F. Casarotto, Silafont-36, the low iron ductile die casting alloy development and applications. Metall. Ital. (2007). https://www.fracturae.com/index.php/aim/article/view/517/488

  24. Y.-L. Chu, S. Balasubramaniam, R. Rajan, R. Shivpuri, A study of the cast alloy-die surface interactions in aluminum die casting, vol. T97-075 (1997)

  25. M. Movahedi, A.H. Kokabi, S.M. Seyed Reihani, Investigation on the bond strength of Al-1100/St-12 roll bonded sheets, optimization and characterization. Mater. Des. 32(6), 3143–3149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Roulin, J.W. Luster, Strength and structure of furnace-brazed joints between aluminum and stainless steel. Weld. Res. Suppl. 78(5), 151–155 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Vrenken, C. Goos, T. Veldt, W. Braunschweig, Fluxless laser brazing of aluminium to steel, Join. Automot. Eng. (2009)

  28. S. Shankar, D. Apelian, Mechanism and preventive measures for die soldering during Al casting in a ferrous mold. JOM 54, 47–54 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02711867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. R.A. Waite, S.R. Hummel, A. Herr, G. Dalton, Analysis of the stress field in a threshold-galling test. Tribol. Int. 39(11), 1421–1427 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2006.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Monroe, P. Sanders, Reducing die lubricant by understanding the importance of draft angle and casting alloy, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T19-083 (Cleveland, OH, 2019)

  31. B. Wang, G.R. Bourne, A.L. Korenyi-Both, S.P. Midson, M.J. Kaufman, An investigation of the use of PVD die coatings to minimize or eliminate lubrication during high pressure die casting, in North American Die Casting Congress, vol. T16-061 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was jointly funded by the North American Die Casting Association and Brunswick Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mercury Marine, Fond Du Lac, USA

    Alex Monroe

  2. Materials Science & Engineering Department, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, 49931, USA

    Paul Sanders

Authors
  1. Alex Monroe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Monroe.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monroe, A., Sanders, P. The Need for a New Approach to Soldering in High Pressure Die Casting. Inter Metalcast 15, 391–397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00504-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40962-020-00504-4

Keywords

  • soldering
  • soldering mechanism
  • HPDC
  • intermetallic layer
  • bonding
  • PVD coatings
  • sticking
  • die life
  • die lubricant

Search

Navigation