Advertisement

Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 591–609 | Cite as

Empirically Investigating the Concept of Lying

  • Alex Wiegmann
  • Ronja Rutschmann
  • Pascale Willemsen
Article

Abstract

Lying is an everyday moral phenomenon about which philosophers have written a lot. Not only the moral status of lying has been intensively discussed but also what it means to lie in the first place. Perhaps the most important criterion for an adequate definition of lying is that it fits with people’s understanding and use of this concept. In this light, it comes as a surprise that researchers only recently started to empirically investigate the folk concept of lying. In this paper, we describe three experimental studies which address the following questions: Does a statement need to be objectively false in order to constitute lying? Does lying necessarily include the intention to deceive? Can one lie by omitting relevant facts?

Keywords

Concept of lying Lying Definition of lying Experimental philosophy 

References

  1. Arico, A. J., & Fallis, D. (2013). Lies, damned lies, and statistics: An empirical investigation of the concept of lying. Philosophical Psychology, 26(6), 790–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carson, T. L. (2006). The definition of lying. Nous, 40(2), 284–306. doi: 10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00610.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carson, T. L. (2010). Lying and deception: Theory and practice (1st publ.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coleman, L., & Kay, P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word lie. Language, 57(1), 26. doi: 10.2307/414285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dynel, M. (2011). A web of deceit: A neo-Gricean view on types of verbal deception. International Review of Pragmatics, 3(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dynel, M. (2015). Intention to deceive, bald-faced lies, and deceptive implicature: Insights into lying at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(3), 309–332. doi: 10.1515/ip-2015-0016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fallis, D. (2009). What is lying? The Journal of Philosophy, 106(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fallis, D. (2010). Is a lie a lie if everyone knows it’s a lie? Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1668919.
  10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In R. J. Stainton (Ed.), Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language: A Concise Anthology (pp. 271–288). Torronto: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grice, P. (1991). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mahon, J. E. (2008). Two definitions of lying. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(2), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahon, J. E. (2016). The definition of lying and deception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/lying-definition/.
  14. Marsili, N. (2016). Lying by promising. International Review of Pragmatics, 8, 271–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meibauer, J. (2005). Lying and falsely implicating. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1373–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meibauer, J. (2011). On lying: intentionality, implicature, and imprecision. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2), 277–292. doi: 10.1515/iprg.2011.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meibauer, J. (2014). Lying at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meibauer, J. (2015). Konzepte des Lügens. Zeitschrift Für Sprachwissenschaft, 34(2), 175–212. doi: 10.1515/zfs-2015-0010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meibauer, J. (2016a). Topics in the linguistics of lying: A reply to Marta Dynel. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(1), 107–123. doi: 10.1515/ip-2016-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meibauer, J. (2016b). Understanding bald-faced lies. International Review of Pragmatics, 8(2), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Noveck, I. A., & Reboul, A. (2008). Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 425–431. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Royzman, E., & Hagan, J. P. (2017). The shadow and the tree. In J.-F. Bonnefort & B. Trémolière (Eds.), Moral inferences (pp. 56–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Rutschmann, R., & Wiegmann, A. (2017). No need for an intention to deceive? Challenging the traditional definition of lying. Philosophical Psychology, 30(4), 434–453. doi: 10.1080/09515089.2016.1277382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saul, J. (2012). Lying, misleading, and what is said: an exploration in philosophy of language and in ethics (1. publ. in paperback.). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorensen, R. (2007). Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 88(2), 251–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00290.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stokke, A. (2013). Lying, deceiving, and misleading. Philosophy Compass, 8(4), 348–359. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turri, A., & Turri, J. (2015). The truth about lying. Cognition, 138, 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Viebahn, E. (2017). Non-literal Lies. Erkenntnis, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10670-017-9880-8.
  29. Vincent, J. M., & Castelfranchi, C. (1981). On the art of deception: how to lie while saying the truth. In H. Parret, M. Sbisa & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics (pp. 749–777). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  30. Wiegmann, A., Samland, J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2016). Lying despite telling the truth. Cognition, 150, 37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wiegmann, A., & Willemsen, P. (2017). How the truth can make a great lie: An empirical investigation of lying by falsely implicating. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. J. Davelaar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3516–3621). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICPR 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Wiegmann
    • 1
  • Ronja Rutschmann
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pascale Willemsen
    • 3
  1. 1.University of GoettingenGoettingenGermany
  2. 2.University of PotsdamPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Ruhr-University BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations