Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Creditworthiness: The Role of Trust in the Socioeconomic Network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explores the significance of a borrower’s socioeconomic network in assessing creditworthiness using a novel theoretical framework. We introduce a method for a lender to consolidate the individuals’ trustworthiness of the borrower within her socioeconomic network. From the borrower’s perspective, we consider the adverse social consequences of default within their socioeconomic network, which acts as a disincentive for the borrower to default on the credit obligation. This social pressure discourages credit default. Building on this connection between trust in a socioeconomic network, our paper develops a model that incorporates aggregate trust, project riskiness, and the social cost of default to evaluate credit risk. In this framework, a borrower with a secure project and a high social cost of default is more likely to honour their credit commitments. Conversely, for a similar project, a borrower with a low social cost of default may be more inclined to wilfully default on their credit obligations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The study is a theoretical model and does not use any data.

Notes

  1. A graph is called strongly connected if for any two nodes there exist a walk.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. 1974. The limits of organization. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A.N., and G.F. Udell. 2002. Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organisational structure. The Economic Journal 112 (477): F32–F53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W.D., and S.A. Hunt. 2005. GEM 2004 Financing report. Boston and London: Babson College and London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, J., and P. Howitt. 1980. Credit rationing and implicit contract theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 12 (3): 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frobenius, G., F.G. Frobenius, F.G. Frobenius, F.G. Frobenius, and G. Mathematician. 1912. Über Matrizen aus nicht negativen Elementen. Kön: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galland, Z. 2006. Think Twice Before Borrowing from Family.

  • Ghatak, M. 1999. Group lending, local information and peer selection. Journal of Development Economics 60 (1): 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E.L., D.I. Laibson, J.A. Scheinkman, and C.L. Soutter. 2000. Measuring trust. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 811–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guérin, I., M. Roesch, G. Venkatasubramanian, and B. D’espallier. 2012. Credit from whom and for what? The diversity of borrowing sources and uses in rural southern India. Journal of International Development 24: S122–S137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales. 2004. The role of social capital in financial development. American Economic Review 94 (3): 526–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K.-C., H.-P. Yen, Y. Gu, and L. Shi. 2020. Does societal trust make firms more trustworthy? Emerging Markets Review 42: 100674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. 1997. Financial intermediation, loanable funds, and the real sector. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (3): 663–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, C., and A. Moro. 2006. Trust within entrepreneur bank relationships: Insights from Italy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30 (4): 495–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H.L. 2023. Social capital and the riskiness of trade credit. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 39: 100832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanagaretnam, K., G.J. Lobo, C. Wang, and D.J. Whalen. 2019. Cross-country evidence on the relationship between societal trust and risk-taking by banks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 54 (1): 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlan, D., M. Mobius, T. Rosenblat, and A. Szeidl. 2009. Trust and social collateral. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (3): 1307–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., and P. Persson. 2016. Financing from family and friends. The Review of Financial Studies 29 (9): 2341–2386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins, K.V., H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo. 2017. Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance 72 (4): 1785–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, A., and M. Fink. 2013. Loan managers’ trust and credit access for SMEs. Journal of Banking and Finance 37 (3): 927–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muduli, S., and S.K. Dash. 2018. Inter-temporal Calculative Trust Design to Reduce Collateral Need for Business Credits. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers 38 (1): 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perron, O. 1907. Zur theorie der matrices. Mathematische Annalen 64 (2): 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M.A., and R.G. Rajan. 1994. The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance 49 (1): 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, S.A. 1990. Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: A stylized model of customer relationships. The Journal of Finance 45 (4): 1069–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., and A. Weiss. 1981. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review 71 (3): 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silu Muduli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions that helped to improve the paper. The views expressed in the paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the institution to which they belong.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muduli, S., Dash, S.K. Creditworthiness: The Role of Trust in the Socioeconomic Network. J. Quant. Econ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00393-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00393-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation