Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What Factors are Driving R&D in the Pharmaceutical Industry in India? A Study of the Post-Liberalization Period

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exist a significant number of studies to find the fundamental factors driving R&D in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Firm size, firm age, export orientation, profits are some important determinants of pharma R&D found by earlier researchers. After liberalization of the Indian economy in 1991 and change in the Patent law as per WTO requirements in 1995, the determining factors of R&D in the pharmaceutical sector are expected to change significantly. This study intends to find the significant factors influencing the R&D status and the intensity of R&D expenditures in the subsequent period, in the framework of bivariate probit model and dynamic panel data model respectively. This study is based on an unbalanced panel of 150 listed firms covering the period 1995–2019. Unlike the earlier studies, market share and import intensity of capital goods have emerged as important factors driving innovation in the pharmaceutical industry in the post-liberalization period along with firm size and export intensity. Moreover, we observe that, both R&D and export are persistent activity and cross-persistence in R&D and export activity is there for full sample firms, large firms and mature firms. Important policy implications that emerge from this study are that the government should promote export of pharmaceutical products, liberalize import of capital goods for this sector and increased competition between firms has a hindering effect on R&D investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

This data is available in Prowess Database provided by Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy. Our data is also extracted from the same source and has been discussed in the relevant section of this paper.

Notes

  1. 1 Annual Report 2020–2021, Government of India, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Department of Pharmaceuticals, 2021.

References

  • Acs, Z.J., and D.B. Audretsch. 1987. Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics LXIX (4): 567–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J., and D.B. Audretsch. 1988. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. The American Economic Review 78 (4): 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90211-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, ed. C. on E. G. of the S. S. R. C. Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Bhattacharya, M., and H. Bloch. 2004. Determinants of innovation. Small Business Economics 22: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, C. 2005. R&D investment and internal finance. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (3): 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000312710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, B. 1974. Research and development activity and profitability: A distributed lag analysis. Journal of Political Economy 82 (5): 999–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., and B.C. Petersen. 2009. Why has the investment-cash flow sensitivity declined so sharply? Rising R&D and equity market developments. Journal of Banking and Finance 33 (5): 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.10.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., and B.C. Petersen. 2011. Cash holdings and R&D smoothing. Journal of Corporate Finance 17 (3): 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., S.M. Fazzari, and B.C. Petersen. 2009. Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance LXIV (1): 151–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., G. Martinsson, and B.C. Petersen. 2015. Do financing constraints matter for R&D? Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS) Electronic Working Paper Series. Paper No. 394.

  • Chakraborty, I. 2019. Debt financing and market concentration in an emerging economy: Firm-level evidence from India. Economic Change and Restructuring. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-019-09256-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, C. 2002. Relationship between debt, R&D and physical investment, evidence from US firm-level data. Applied Financial Economics 12 (2): 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100110102709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M. 2010. Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In Handbook of the economics of innovation (1st ed., Vol. 1, Issue 1 C). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X

  • Cohen, Wesley M., and R.C. Levin. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Handbook of industrial organization, vol. II, ed. R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, 1059–1107. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W.M., R.C. Levin, and D.C. Mowery. 1987. Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination. The Journal of Industrial Economics 35 (4): 543–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki, Dirk, and H. Hottenrott. 2010. Financing constraints for industrial innovation: What do we know? Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Business and Economics.

  • Czarnitzki, D., and H. Hottenrott. 2011. Financial constraints: Routine versus cutting edge R&D investment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20 (1): 121–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan, J.P., Č Kostevc, and S. Polanec. 2010. From innovation to exporting or vice versa? The World Economy 33 (3): 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01260.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delattre, E., R.K. Moussa, and M. Sabatier. 2019. Health condition and job status interactions: Econometric evidence of causality from a French longitudinal survey. Health Economics Review. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0220-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteve-Pérez, S., and D. Rodríguez. 2013. The dynamics of exports and R&D in SMEs. Small Business Economics 41 (1): 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9421-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., H. Görg, and A. Hanley. 2008. R&D and exporting: A comparison of British and Irish firms. Review of World Economics 144 (4): 750–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0168-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, H. 1968. The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical, drug, and petroleum industries. Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/259401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H. 1992. Investment and research and development at the firm level: Does the source of financing matter? National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 4096.

  • Harris, M.N., M. Rogers, and A. Siouclis. 2003. Modelling firm innovation using panel probit estimators. Applied Economics Letters 10: 683–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350485032000138999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, Morton I. 1989. Market structure and innovation revisited. Japan and the World Economy 1: 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I., and N.L. Schwartz. 1975. Market structure and innovation: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 93 (3): 395–410. https://doi.org/10.2307/1883165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, Morton I., and N.L. Schwartz. 1978. Self-financing of an R&D project. American Economic Review 68 (3): 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandamuthan, S. 2002. Market concentration, firm size and innovative activity: A firm-level economic analysis of selected Indian industries under economic liberalisation. WIDER Discussion Paper, No. 2002/108. Provided in Cooperation with: United Nations University (UNU), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).

  • Kathuria, S. 1989. Market structure and innovation. A survey of empirical studies of schumpeterian hypotheses for developed countries and India. Economic and Political Weekly, August 26: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., and M. Saqib. 1996. Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: The case of Indian manufacturing. Research Policy 25: 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00854-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. 1983. Determinants of R&D in an LDC. The Indian Engineering Industry. Economics Letters 13: 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(83)90198-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. 1964. Industrial research and development expenditures: Determinants, prospects, and relation to size of firm and inventive output. Journal of Political Economy 72 (4): 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. 2010. R&D efforts by Indian pharmaceutical firms in the new patent regime. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 5 (2): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-010-0018-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neves, A., A.A.C. Teixeira, and S.T. Silva. 2016. Exports-R&D investment complementarity and economic performance of firms located in Portugal. Investigacion Economica 75 (295): 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inveco.2016.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. 2009. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal 9 (1): 86–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. 1965. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review 55 (5): 1097–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1942. Can capitalism survive? In Capitalism, socialism and democracy (pp. 59–139). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315270548-17.

  • Stiglitz, J., and P. Dasgupta. 1980. Industrial structure and the nature of innovative activity. The Economic Journal 90 (358): 266–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, S., V. Mahajan, and D.K. Nauriyal. 2014. Innovations in Indian drug and pharmaceutical industry: Have they impacted exports? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 19 (July): 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Editor and the reviewer for the very useful comments which helped us to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Muralidhar Girls’ College, Kolkata, India

    Aruna Pain

  2. Institute of Development Studies Kolkata (IDSK), Salt Lake City, Kolkata, 700064, India

    Indrani Chakraborty

Authors
  1. Aruna Pain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Indrani Chakraborty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aruna Pain.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pain, A., Chakraborty, I. What Factors are Driving R&D in the Pharmaceutical Industry in India? A Study of the Post-Liberalization Period. J. Quant. Econ. 21, 617–640 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-023-00353-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-023-00353-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation