Skip to main content
Log in

Some Consequences of Including Impulse-Indicator Dummy Variables in Econometric Models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Suppose that a regression model includes a regressor that is a dummy variable that takes a non-zero value for only one observation. Then the least squares estimates of the coefficients of the other regressors are the same as would be obtained by dropping that observation from the sample and omitting the dummy variable. This is well-known, but is frequently overlooked by practitioners. In this note we extend this result to the case of instrumental variables estimation, and to maximum likelihood estimation of models for count data, binary dependent variables, and duration data. These extensions also allow for the inclusion of many such “impulse-indicator” variables in the model, not just one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cameron, A.C., and P.K. Trivedi. 1986. Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1: 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.R. 1972. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E. 2017. On the inconsistency of instrumental variables estimators for the coefficients of certain dummy variables. Journal of Quantitative Economics 15: 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 2008. Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data. Economics Letters 99: 585–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, D.F., and C. Santos. 2005. Regression models with data-based indicator variables. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67: 571–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E.L., and P. Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T. 1992. The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkever, D.S. 1976. The use of dummy variables to compute predictions, prediction errors, and confidence intervals. Journal of Econometrics 4: 393–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, C., D.F. Hendry, and S. Johansen. 2008. Automatic selection of indicators in a fully saturated regression. Computational Statistics 23: 317–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Ryan Godwin and Jacob Schwartz for helpful discussions relating to an earlier version of this paper, and to an anonymous referee for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E. Giles.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research was not funded. There are no conflicts of interest/competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giles, D.E. Some Consequences of Including Impulse-Indicator Dummy Variables in Econometric Models. J. Quant. Econ. 20, 329–336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00294-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00294-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation