Skip to main content
Log in

Returns to Growth in Indian Automobile Industry: A Non-Parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the concept of returns to growth (RTG) of Indian automobile industry by evaluating the relationship between growth of inputs and growth of outputs for estimating the RTG behavior of the major firms. RTG behaviour assumes importance for the Indian automobile industry which operates in a fiercely competitive oligopolistic market environment with clear evidences of price stickiness over last two decades. With increasingly stricter regulatory norms and rising costs of production, the automobile industry faces many challenges to sustain profitability. The firms need to innovate constantly and experience increasing returns to scale (RTS) to remain relevant. The empirical findings of the Indian automobile industry reveal that firms operating under increasing RTS may exhibit constant or decreasing RTG; firms showing constant RTS may exhibit increasing or decreasing RTG; and firms showing decreasing RTS may exhibit constant or increasing RTG. The paper finds that RTS estimates need not provide guidance to the growth strategy behavior of firms which operate under oligopolistic competition which compounds the challenges to remain profitable with a sticky price phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R., D. Lewis, and T. Springer. 2000. Operating efficiencies in real estate: a critical review of the literature. Journal of Real Estate Literature. 38 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., J.C. Panzar, and R.D. Willig. 1982. Contestable markets and the theory of industrial structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D., and M. Weiss. 2000. Analyzing Firm Performance in Insurance Industry Using Frontier Efficiency and Productivity Methods. In Handbook of Insurance, ed. G. Dionne, 767–829. Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Borger, B., K. Kerstens, and A. Costa. 2002. Public transit performance: what does one learn from frontier studies? Transport Reviews 22 (1): 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker, P., and S. Zenios. 2001. What Drives Performance of Financial Institutions? In Performance of Financial Institutions: Efficiency, Innovation, Regulation, ed. P. Harker and S. Zenios, 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan, Y. 2008. Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., and P.K.J. Mohapatra. 2001. Measuring technical efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Opsearch 38: 456–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., and K. Tone. 2009a. Decomposing capacity utilization in data envelopment analysis: an application to banks in India. European Journal of Operational Research 195: 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., and K. Tone. 2009b. Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: with an application to Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research 196: 1130–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., P.K.J. Mohapatra, and M.L. Trivedi. 1999. A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and frontier translog production function for estimating returns to scale and efficiencies. International Journal of Systems Science 30: 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., J.K. Sengupta, and A. Mandal. 2007. Productive performance evaluation of the banking sector in India using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Operations Research 4: 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., K. Kerstens, and K. Tone. 2012. Tone. Returns to growth in a non-parametric DEA approach. International Transactions in Operational Research. 19: 463–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, B.K., R. Singh, B. Mishra, and K. Shankaran. 2017. Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968–2015: a directional benefit of doubt model analysis. Omega 66: 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L.M., and J. Zhu. 2002. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 142: 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 1999. A dynamic efficiency model using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 62: 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2002. Model of hyper competition. International Journal of Systems Science 33: 669–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2003. New efficiency theory: with applications of data envelopment analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2004. Competition and growth: innovations and selection in industry evolution. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2005a. Nonparametric efficiency analysis under uncertainty using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 95: 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2005b. Data envelopment analysis with heterogeneous data: an application. Journal of the Operational Research Society 56: 676–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2007. Dynamics of entry and market evolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K. 2011. Understanding economic growth: modern theory and experience. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K., and B.K. Sahoo. 2006. Efficiency models in data envelopment analysis: techniques of evaluation of productivity of firms in a growing economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E., and S.E. Stefanou. 2003. Nonparametric dynamic production analysis and the theory of cost. Journal of Productivity Analysis 19: 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E., and S.E. Stefanou. 2007. Nonparametric dynamic efficiency analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89: 398–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. 1997. Learning from learning by doing: lessons for economic growth. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P.M. 1939. Demand under conditions of oligopoly. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/255420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., and B.K. Sahoo. 2003. Scale, indivisibilities and production function in data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 84: 165–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone, K., and B.K. Sahoo. 2005. Cost efficiency and returns to scale in life insurance corporation of India using data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 39: 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, A. 2001. An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics 9 (3): 245–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramakrushna Panigrahi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panigrahi, R. Returns to Growth in Indian Automobile Industry: A Non-Parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. J. Quant. Econ. 19, 747–765 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-021-00246-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-021-00246-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation