Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling the Education Supply Chain with Network DEA Model: The Case of Tunisia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little has been done on network DEA in education, and nobody has attempted to model the whole education supply chain using network DEA. As such the contribution of the present paper is to evaluate the efficiency of Tunisian education supply chain with a network DEA developed by Kao and Hwang (Eur J Oper Res 185:418–429, 2008). The idea consists on subdividing the education system into three sub-processes, where, primary, secondary and tertiary education are linked by intermediate variables. Input variables of the whole education system are “the number of schools” and “the number of students enrolled in the first year of basic education”. Output generated from basic education “Promoted pupils from basic education” is the only input used by secondary education. The output variable “Graduates from secondary education” is then used by tertiary education to produce the output of the whole education system which is “Graduates from tertiary education”. The results of assessment show that most governorates have a lower efficiency scores in tertiary education compared to efficiency in basic and secondary education. The results of the efficiency scores ranking demonstrate an important similarity between the ranks of the whole education system efficiency and the tertiary education efficiency. This result confirms that the inefficiency of education in Tunisia is mainly due to the inefficiency of tertiary education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Basic education in Tunisia consists of 9 years of school education and it concerns children aged from 6 to 14 years old. It is divided in two complementary cycles: first cycle (provided in primary schools for a period of 6 year) and secondary cycle (provided in colleges with duration of 3 years), (Afonso et al. 2013).

  2. Secondary education in Tunisia is available to holders of diploma at the end of basic education’s study and it lasts for 4 years (Afonso et al. 2013).

  3. Tertiary education in Tunisia represents the educational level following the completion of a school providing a secondary education. In Tunisia, tertiary education Tunisia is provided by Universities, Higher Institutions of Technological Studies (ISET) and Higher Institutes of Teachers Training (IGH) (Ramzi and Ayadi 2016).

References

  • Abbott, M., and C. Doucouliagos. 2003. The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review 22 (1): 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., M. Ayadi, and S. Ramzi. 2013. Assessing productivity performance of basic and secondary education in Tunisia: a malmquist analysis. Journal of Business & Economics 5 (1): 104–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, T., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper. 1988. Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio Economic Planning Sciences 22 (6): 259–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, T., V. Arnold, A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper. 1989. DEA and ratio efficiency analyses for public institutions of higher learning in Texas. Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting Journal 5: 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran, N.K. 2001. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Scio-Economic Planning Sciences 35 (1): 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahinipati, K., A. Kanda, and S.G. Deshmukh. 2009. Coordinated supply management: review, insights, and limitations. International Journal of Logistic Research and Applications 12 (6): 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1981. Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through. Management Science 27 (6): 668–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, L., R. Pesenti, and W. Ukovich. 2004. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research 154 (2): 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, O., and A. Ecer. 2009. Efficiency in accounting education: evidence from Turkish Universities. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 20 (5): 614–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T.Y., P.H. Chung, and S.S. Hsu. 2012. Two-stage performance model for evaluating the managerial efficiency of tertiary education: Application by the Taiwanese tourism and leisure department. Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 11 (2): 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., and G. Whittaker. 1995. An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. Journal of Agriculture Economics 46 (2): 201–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander, J.P. 1995. Academic research and teaching productivities: A case study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49 (3): 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, C., and S.N. Hwang. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research 185: 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L., Z.Q. Li, W.D. Cook, and J. Zhu. 2011. Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback. IIE Transactions 43 (5): 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J.S., L.Y. Lu, W.L. Lu, and B. Lin. 2013. A survey of DEA applications. Omega 41 (5): 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed Ali, S.M., and S. Mahsa. 2013. Network DEA: an application to analysis of academic performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 9 (1): 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramzi, S., and M. Ayadi. 2016. Assessment of universities efficiencies using data envelopment analysis: weights restrictions and super-efficiency measure. Journal of Applied Management and Investments 5 (1): 40–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayeni, M.M., and F.H. Saljooghi. 2010. Network Data envelopment analysis model for estimating efficiency and productivity in universities. Journal of Computer Science 6 (11): 1252–1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L.M., and J. Zhu. 1999. Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks. Management Science 45 (9): 1270–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.H., R.D. Gopal, and S. Zionts. 1997. Use of Data Envelopment Analysis in assessing Information Technology impact on firm performance. Annals of Operations Research 73:191–213.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sourour Ramzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramzi, S. Modeling the Education Supply Chain with Network DEA Model: The Case of Tunisia. J. Quant. Econ. 17, 525–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-018-0131-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-018-0131-x

Keywords

Navigation