Comparative analysis of the nonlinear unified strength criterion for rocks and other three-dimensional Hoek–Brown strength criteria
The Hoek–Brown strength criterion, which has been widely used in rock engineering, is one of the most influential rock strength criteria. Because this criterion does not take into account the effect of intermediate principal stress and because there are deficiencies in the theory and its practical application, for nearly 30 years many scholars have carried out research related to this topic. Yu and Zan took the advantages of the unified strength theory and integrated this theory with the Hoek–Brown strength criterion, thereby proposing the nonlinear unified strength criterion for rocks. This criterion takes into account the difference between the tensile strength and the compressive strength of rock, i.e. the intermediate principal stress effect, and the researchers determined that the limit loci in the meridian plane are nonlinear. The parameters of the nonlinear unified strength criterion are the same as those of the Hoek–Brown strength criterion obtained from conventional triaxial tests for rock blocks. The current study compared and analyzed the relationship between the nonlinear unified strength criterion and other three-dimensional Hoek–Brown strength criteria proposed by Pan and Hudson, Zhang and Zhu, and Jiang. Using the comparison of failure limit lines of the various strength criteria in the π-plane, the nonlinear unified strength criterion is superior to other strength criteria. Using the 1stOpt software of the general global optimization algorithm to fit the strength criterion parameters, the comparison of the results of the nonlinear unified strength criterion with the true triaxial test data from six types of rocks shows good agreement, and the true triaxial test of rock strength can be evaluated with high accuracy.
KeywordsRock strength criterion Hoek–Brown strength criterion Nonlinear unified strength criterion
We acknowledge our gratitude toward the sponsors of the work presented in this paper: the MOE’s Program for Changjiang Scholars and the Innovative Research Team (IRT13092).
- Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng ASCE 106:1013–1035Google Scholar
- Hoek E, Wood D, Shah S (1992) A modified Hoek–Brown criterion for jointed rock masses. In: Hudson JA (ed) Proceedings of the rock characterization, symposium of ISRM. British Geotechnical Society, London, pp 209–214Google Scholar
- Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: Hammah R, Bawden W, Curran J, Telesnicki M (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth North American rock mechanics symposium (NARMS-TAC). University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 267–273Google Scholar
- Jiang H (2015) A simple convenient three-dimensional Hoek–Brown criterion for rocks. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 34(Suppl1):2996–3004 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Mogi K (2007) Experimental rock mechanics. Taylor and Francis, London, p 64Google Scholar
- Pan X, Hudson JA (1988) A simplified three dimensional Hoek–Brown yield criterion. In: Romana M (ed) Rock mechanics and power plants. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 95–103Google Scholar
- Shi XC, Meng YF, Li G (2011) Comparative analyses of several rock strength criteria. Rock Soil Mech 32(Suppl 1):209–216 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Wang R, Kemeny JM (1995) A new empirical criterion for rock under polyaxial compressive stresses. In: Daemen S (ed) Rock mechanics. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 453–458Google Scholar
- Yu MH (2011) New system of strength theory: theory, development and application, 2nd edn. Xi an Jiao Tong University Press, Xi an, pp 75–95 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Zan YW, Yu MH, Wang SJ (2002) Nonlinear unified strength criterion of rock. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 21:1435–1441 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
- Zhang YP, Cao P, Dong LJ (2010) A robust regression model and its application in calculating shear strength of rock. Sci Technol Rev 28:91–95 (in Chinese)Google Scholar