Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of VIA, VILI, PAP Smear, and FRD Tests in Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To compare the efficacy of VIA, VILI, PAP smear, and FRD tests [Folate Receptor-Mediated Staining solution detection], for cervical cancer screening.

Methodology

Women attending colposcopy and cervical cancer screening clinic were offered FRD test. This is an applicator to touch the cervix and detect color change using FRD solution. Pap smear was done a day prior to colposcopy. Informed consent was obtained and a calculated sample size of 203 women were enrolled. Colposcopic directed cervical biopsy was taken for 126 women.

Results

The results of screening tests PAP smear, VIA, VILI, VIA/ VILI combination, and FRD test were compared with histopathological reports of cervical biopsy. PAP smears with specificity of 96%, diagnostic accuracy of 92%, had sensitivity of 25%, and missed two cases of cervical cancer and four cases of HSIL. The combination of VIA and VILI tests under 6× magnification showed sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 24.58%, and diagnostic accuracy of 29.37%. FRD tests showed sensitivity of 100%, with nil false-negative results, specificity of 76.27%, and diagnostic accuracy of 77.78%.

Conclusion

Among the screening tests the VIA/VILI combination and FRD tests gave instant results for cervical cancer screening. The FRD test, with higher sensitivity, than that of PAP smear and higher accuracy than that of combined VIA/VILI tests, showed good efficacy to identify CIN2 + lesions in women who would require colposcopy and cervical biopsy for early detection of precancerous lesions of cervix and cervical cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Statistics. Report from national cancer registry programme, India. JCO Global Oncology. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00122JCOGlobalOncology.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Martel C, Ferlay J, Franceschi S, et al. Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:607–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) International agency for research on cancer. India factsheet. Lyon: IARC. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2021

  6. National Centre for Disease Informatics Research. National cancer registry programme, ICMR three year report of population based registries, 2009–2011 Bangalore. India: NCDIR-NCRP (ICMR); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christe DM, Chandrasekar A, Jayashree K, Meenalochani P, Gunasingh STK. Prevention of cervical cancer: early detection of precancerous lesions of cervix in women from a marginalized environment. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(12):5156–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campos NG, Tsu V, Jeronimo J, Mvundura M, Lee K, Kim JJ. When and how often to screen for cervical cancer in three low- and middle-income countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Papillomavirus Res. 2015;1:38–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2015.05.003.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sawaya GF, Smith-McCune K. Cervical Cancer Screening. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2016;127(3):459–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adamopoulou M, et al. Comparison of cytology, colposcopy, HPV typing and biomarker analysis in cervical neoplasia. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):3401–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dijkstra MG, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M, et al. Cervical cancer screening: on the way to a shift from cytology to full molecular screening. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:927–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:954–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sideri M, Igidbashian S. HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer. Lancet. 2014;383:1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sauvaget C, Fayette J-M, Muwonge R, et al. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;113:14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ChristeDM, Mini Jacob S, Daniel A (2018) Prevalence of high-risk HPV types in women referred to a colposcopy clinic. In: a Public Hospital, Chennai - South India. JIMA I16(7): 17–20

  16. Zhao Y, Li M, Li Y, et al. Evaluation of folate receptor-mediated cervical dyeing as a method for detection of cervical lesions. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2019;23(2):133–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/LGT.0000000000000411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canto MI, Setrakian S, Willis J, et al. Methylene blue-directed biopsies improve detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:560–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dai Y, Wang L, Li D. Effectiveness of novel folate receptor-mediated staining solution detection (FRD) for cervical cancer screening. Medicine. 2018;97(34): e11868. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu MH, Hu LY, Du XX, et al. A special epithelial staining agent: folic acid receptor-mediated diagnosis (FRD) effectively and conveniently screen patients with cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:7830–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilgenbrink AR, Low PS. Folate receptor-mediated drug targeting: from therapeutics to diagnostics. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94:2135–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank, Prof. S. Shobha, Director of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, for granting permission and support to conduct the study. They thank all the staff in the Cervical Cancer Screening and Colposcopy Clinic for their support in the data collection. They thank Dr. Zhu for the preliminary statistical analysis.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Christe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

D. M. Christe: Formerly at Regional Centre for Clinical Research in Reproduction, Govt. Hospital for Women and Children, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christe, D.M., Thiripurasundari, G. & Alfonso, T. Efficacy of VIA, VILI, PAP Smear, and FRD Tests in Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Study. Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 19, 93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00589-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-021-00589-7

Keywords

Navigation