Abstract
The proper assessment of shear coupling is necessary for the evaluation of laminated glass performance between the bounding layered and monolithic limits. The most common simplified design approach consists in defining the effective thickness, i.e., the thickness of a monolithic section with equivalent flexural properties. Cantilevered laminated glass balustrades are common applications of structural glass. However, the use of existing effective thickness methods presents strong limitations for their design. Here, the conjugate beam effective thickness (CBET) method is presented, based on the conjugate beam analogy recently proposed to evaluate the response of inflected laminates formed by external elastic beams bonded by an adhesive ply. The conjugate beam analogy, applied to laminated glass beams, allows accurate evaluation of the shear stress transmitted by the interlayer, based on the response of a monolithic conjugate beam, with the option to constrain relative sliding of plies at a beam end. Once the shear coupling is known, the effective thickness may be evaluated with the proposed CBET model by comparing the maximum stress and deflection of the laminated beam with a monolithic Euler–Bernoulli beam. The CBET method’s formulas can be readily applied to evaluate the maximum stress and cantilever freeend deflection for different load and boundary conditions, representative of cantilevered laminated glass balustrade supported in a Uprofile.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
The contours shown in Figure 1 have been evaluated by considering a LG element composed of 7.42 mm glass  1.52 mm interlayer  7.42 mm glass section. Considered mechanical properties of glass are E = 71.7 GPa, \(\nu \) = 0.22, and the interlayer are G = 10 MPa, \(\nu \) = 0.49.
Notice that, hereafter, the term equivalent is used for the beam represented in Fig. 3a subject to a load per unit length q(x) accounting for the shear coupling. On the other hand, the term effective refers to the beam of Fig. 3b, which is a monolithic beam with effective thickness, subject to the same load p(x) of the real laminate.
The axial force could be, equivalently, evaluated by solving Eq. (2.5), with appropriate boundary conditions on N(x) and \(N'(x)\) at the beam’s ends. However, the conjugate beam analysis is prefered, since it provides a synthetic view of the shearcoupling effect.
The viscoelastic interlayer response is time and temperaturedependent. Depending upon the polymer type, service temperature and characteristic loadduration, the secant shear modulus of the interlayer may vary approximately from 0.01 MPa (for PVB interlayers at 50 \(^{\circ }\)C, under permanent load) up to 420 MPa (for stiff PVB and ionoplast interlayers at 0 \(^{\circ }\)C, under 1 s loads).
More precisely, when the laminate is supported at an interior point, say \(x={\bar{x}}\), there is a jump in shear \(V({\bar{x}}^)\ne V({\bar{x}}^+)\), where \(V'(x)=p(x)\). This results in a jump discontinuity of the shear in the conjugate beam \( {\widetilde{V}}(x)=EI\ \alpha ^2 (\mu ^21)\frac{V(x)}{H} \).
Note the maximum deflection, in absolute values, is attained between the two supports where a is large relative to L (for example, for \(a>\sim 6 L\) in the case of beam under end load).
Abbreviations
 CBET:

Conjugate Beam Effective Thickness
 EET:

Enhanced Effective Thickness
 PVB:

Polyvinyl butyral (a safety glass interlayer)
 L :

Length of the the cantilever span
 a :

Length of simplysupported span
 b :

Beam width
 d :

Distance from free end of cantilevered span
 \(i= 1, 2\) :

Glass ply numbering
 \(h_i\) :

Thickness of the ith glass ply
 t :

Thickness of the interlayer
 x, y, z :

Axial, throughthethickness and lateral beam directions
 E :

Young’s modulus of glass
 G :

Secant shear modulus of the interlayer
 \(\nu \) :

Poisson’s ratio
 \(A_i\) :

Cross sectional area of the ith glass ply
 \(I_i\) :

Moment of inertia of the ith glass ply
 H :

Distance between the midplane of two glass plies
 \(I_L, I_M\) :

Moment of inertia of the beam at the layered and monolithic limits, respectively
 \(p(x) = p \) :

Transverse load per unit length acting on the laminated glass beam
 F :

Concentrated transverse load acting on the laminated glass beam
 v(x):

Outofplane deflection of the laminated glass beam
 \(\tau (x)\) :

Shear stress transmitted by the interlayer
 m(x):

Distributed torque per unit length due to the shear coupling
 N(x):

Axial force acting in the glass plies
 M(x):

Bending moment due to the external load
 V(x):

Transverse (shear) force acting in the glass plies
 \(\mu \) :

Geometrical nondimensional parameter
 \(\alpha \) :

Parameter dependent on glass and interlayer mechanical properties
 \({\widetilde{P}}\) :

Effective axial load
 \({\widetilde{p}}(x)\) :

Effective distributed transverse load
 \({\widetilde{F}}\) :

Effective concentrated transverse load
 \({\widetilde{v}}(x)\) :

Outofplane deflection of the conjugate beam
 q(x):

Fictitious transverse load per unit length acting on the laminated glass beam
 \(q_{i}(x)\) :

Fictitious transverse load per unit length acting on the ith glass ply
 \(n_{i}(x)\) :

Fictitious axial load per unit length acting on the ith glass ply
 \(M_i(x)\) :

Bending moment associated to the fictitious load on the ith glass ply
 \(I_{eff;w}\) :

Effective moment inertia
 \(v_{eff}(x)\) :

Outofplane deflection of the effective beam
 \(y_i\) :

Distance from the midplane of the ith glass ply
 \(\sigma _i(x,y_i)\) :

Surface stress along the ith ply
 \(\sigma _{eff}\) :

Axial stress along the effective beam
 \(\lambda \) :

Load and boundary condition pair hyperbolic coefficient
 \(h_w\) :

Deflectioneffective thickness
 \(h_{\sigma ;i}\) :

Stresseffective thickness in the ith glass ply
 \(h_{\sigma ;i;int}\) :

Stresseffective thickness of the compressive surface of the ith glass ply
References
Andreozzi, L., Briccoli Bati, S., Fagone, M., Ranocchiai, G., Zulli, F.: Dynamic torsion tests to characterize the thermoviscoelastic properties of polymeric interlayers for laminated glass. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 1–13 (2014)
Aşık, M.Z., Tezcan, S.: A mathematical model for the behavior of laminated glass beams. Comput. Struct. 83(21–22), 1742–1753 (2005)
Baidjoe, Y., Van Lancker, B., Belis, J.: Calculation methods of glass parapets in aluminium clamping profiles. Glass Struct. Eng. 3(2), 321–334 (2018)
Ballarini, R., Pisano, G., RoyerCarfagni, G.: The lower bound for glass strength and its interpretation with generalized Weibull statistics for structural applications. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 142(12), 04016100 (2016)
Behr, R.A., Minor, J.E., Norville, H.S.: Structural behavior of architectural laminated glass. J. Struct. Eng. 119(1), 202–222 (1993)
Calderone, I., Davies, P.S., Bennison, S.J., Xiaokun, H., Gang, L.: Effective laminate thickness for the design of laminated glass. In: Proceedings of Glass Performance Days, Tampere (FIN), pp. 12–15 (2009)
Callewaert, D., Belis, J., Delincé, D., Van Impe, R.: Experimental stiffness characterisation of glass/ionomer laminates for structural applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 37, 685–692 (2012)
Di Paola, M., Galuppi, L., Royer Carfagni, G.: Fractional viscoelastic characterization of laminated glass beams under timevarying loading. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 196, 106274 (2021)
Falsone, G.: The use of generalised functions in the discontinuous beam bending differential equations. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 18(3), 337–343 (2002)
Foraboschi, P.: Laminated glass columns. Struct. Eng. 87(18), 20–26 (2009)
Foraboschi, P.: Analytical model for laminatedglass plate. Compos. Part B Eng. 43(5), 2094–2106 (2012)
Foraboschi, P.: Threelayered sandwich plate: exact mathematical model. Compos. Part B Eng. 45(1), 1601–1612 (2013)
Galuppi, L., RoyerCarfagni, G.: Composite beams with viscoelastic interlayer. An application to laminated glass. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 49, 2637–2645 (2012)
Galuppi, L., RoyerCarfagni, G.: Effective thickness of laminated glass beams. New expression via a variational approach. Eng. Struct. 38, 53–67 (2012)
Galuppi, L., RoyerCarfagni, G.: The effective thickness of laminated glass plates. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 7(4), 375–400 (2012)
Galuppi, L., RoyerCarfagni, G.: Enhanced effective thickness of multilayered laminated glass. Compos. Part B Eng. 64, 202–213 (2014)
Galuppi, L., RoyerCarfagni, G.: Conjugatebeam analogy for inflexed laminates. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 206, 396–411 (2020)
Girhammar, U.A., Gopu, V.K.A.: Composite beamcolumns with interlayer slipxact analysis. J. Struct. Eng. 119(4), 1265–1282 (1993)
Hána, T., Janda, T., Schmidt, J., Zemanová, A., Šejnoha, M., Eliášová, M., Vokáč, M.: Experimental and numerical study of viscoelastic properties of polymeric interlayers used for laminated glass: determination of material parameters. Materials 12(14), 2241 (2019)
Ivanov, I.V.: Analysis, modelling, and optimization of laminated glasses as plane beam. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 43(22–23), 6887–6907 (2006)
Kuntsche, J., Schuster, M., Schneider, J.: Engineering design of laminated safety glass considering the shear coupling: a review. Glass Struct. Eng. 1–20 (2019)
National Research Council (Italy). CNRDT 210: Guide for the Design, Construction and Control of Buildings with Structural Glass Elements (2013)
Newmark, N.M.: Test and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction. Proc. Soc. Exp. Stress Anal. 9(1), 75–92 (1951)
Nizich, AJ., Galuppi, L.: Enhanced effective thickness method for cantilevered laminated glass balustrades. In: Proceedings of Glass Performance Days, pp. 398–401. Tampere (FI) (2019)
Nizich, A.J., Galuppi, L.: Cantilevered laminated glass balustrades: the conjugate beam effective thickness methodPart II. Comparison and application. Glass. Struct. Eng. (submitted,) (2021)
Norville, H.S., King, K.W., Swofford, J.L.: Behavior and strength of laminated glass. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 124(1), 46–53 (1998)
Quaglini, V., Cattaneo, S., Biolzi, L.: Numerical assessment of laminated cantilevered glass plates with point fixings. Glass Struct. Eng., 1–18 (2020)
Strand7. Reference Manual, Release 2.4. Strand7 Pty Ltd., Sydney (2015)
Wölfel, E.: Nachgiebiger verbund  eine näherungslösung und deren anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Stahlbau 6, 173–180 (1987)
Yavari, A., Sarkani Jr., S., Moyer, E.T.: On applications of generalized functions to beam bending problems. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 37(40), 5675–5705 (2000)
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or notforprofit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This research paper results from a joint collaboration of the involved Authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galuppi, L., Nizich, A.J. Cantilevered laminated glass balustrades: the Conjugate Beam Effective Thickness method—part I: the analytical model. Glass Struct Eng 6, 377–395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940021001568
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940021001568
Keywords
 Laminated glass
 Balustrades
 Glass design
 Effective thickness
 Analytical methods